champchamp wrote: » So March 31st is it, or is the Sallins bypass still not confirmed as opening then?
Kevtherev1 wrote: » There was some article or update a while back, cant remember where that said Sallins Bypass would now open May 2021. But i am open to correction. With junction 9A end of march, which has been confirmed recently.
spacetweek wrote: » These are the dates I heard. Don't see why traffic would back up from the junction without Sallins part. Traffic going to/from Naas north could use it for now.
MYSTICA1 wrote: » I don’t think anything has been officially confirmed? Personally, I don’t see any reason why the bypass can’t also open once the junction opens. In fact, the reason they gave for not opening the junction since its initial completion, was that they needed to open both at the same time, claiming traffic might back up onto the motorway if the bypass wasn’t open to relieve it.
Golden Horde wrote: » I haven't seen it anywhere that any part of the bypass is due to open before the end of the month. The only place it's been mentioned is further up this thread with a quote from Irish motorway info. No mention of it on any of the other usual politicians who would love to be the first with that info - James Lawless, Bill Clear etc. I'd find it strange that they refused to open junction 9a all along as it was all to open in one go, and then go ahead and change that at the last minute. A final push could see this open soon if the will was there.
WishUWereHere wrote: » The fact they decided to open after the prolonged refusal also puzzled me.
BuzzFish wrote: » Bear in mind that the connection from Millennium park to the junction has now been redone, widened and a new signalled pedestrian crossing is being put in place. Maybe these changes were immediately realised after initial completion but the delay since has been due the wrangling over costs and getting added funding for these changes. Completely made up by me but plausible.
Golden Horde wrote: » True and I had thought of that myself that the delay was because of the errors on the build of junction 9a and saying it was all to open in one go was a smokescreen to buy time to fix the errors.....but we've not seen any notice of any part of it opening other than this thread.....so I don't know.
toe_knee wrote: » Just got an email from James Lawless office, audit on Wednesday with an update to follow. "Below is the latest information we have on this road. A Road Safety Audit is scheduled for the Sallins Bypass for the 24th March. The outcome of that audit will determine when the road will open. Once we have firm date will let the Members know. We are working on a resolution for the tie in area at Millbrook and Lidl- the pavement and footpaths here are substandard and will deteriorate further when the traffic volume increases. We will provide a full update to Members once we have agreed an approach to getting this work done."
MYSTICA1 wrote: » Thanks for the pics millb. Can anyone explain the impact, if any, of what the pics show? I assume it is the expansion joint for the bridge, but is this a major rework or simply a planned task that may only take a few days?
millb wrote: » I wonder what the speed limits will be set at on the bypass? it could be 80 on the dual-carriageway with no adjacent path and possibly reduced to 60 on the single cariageway section. down to 50 nr Millbrook / Lidl?
WishUWereHere wrote: » Just driven up on the M7NB. It appears the incomplete signage on the Mway has been completed. J9a must be opening soon.
Golden Horde wrote: » Per Bill Clear , local councillor facebook page "Sallins Bypass At the moment they are doing a safety audit. Once completed they will have some issues to resolve like signs and small repairs. This will take about a week from now. I expect it then to open late next week. A long time coming." So, maybe before Easter after all.
BuzzFish wrote: » He'll have to be right at some stage but he's not a bit reliable.
MYSTICA1 wrote: » https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcrLff1u41I Looks ready any day now! Siac Colas site also updated but simply says “opening soon”
pad199207 wrote: » Looks fantastic!
BuzzFish wrote: » This looks odd (very minor I know) Shouldn't it be either one lane, or two with a line between?