gormdubhgorm wrote: » I am delighted I have a FH bound to land on one or two 'right' decisions. Must be a nightmare without the FH. If I had 8/9 players starting and no FH I would likely make one transfer and save for gw30 /gw31 where transfers could be more valuable - with more/better options.
sheroman01 wrote: » Soucek vs Arsenal sounds very tempting....
JPup wrote: » Instead of Lingard or are you thinking of doubling up? I was thinking of doing Lingard and Antonio although if Bamford is fit maybe he’s a better choice up front. It’s a funny week for the FH. So few games but still at least 20 plausible options to choose from. So anybody who does get a big score that isn’t in your team is almost certainly someone you thought about and will be kicking yourself for not selecting!
ShagNastii wrote: » Really tempted to go Gundog —> Grealish but I think people hopping on Grealish are being a bit too smart. He probably won’t start. Too much of a gamble.
Muahahaha wrote: » Yeah with Grealish Id be interested to know what his form was like when coming back from previous injuries. For some players they are straight back into it and for others it takes up to three games for them to get back to speed. With only 9 games left potential Grealish owners cant afford the latter scenario. Even if he doesnt return till after the international break with so few games left owners need him to get on the points immediately. Which is a concern as it doesnt always turn out that way.
sheroman01 wrote: » Is it madness brining in a Brighton defender? Makes sense for GW29, but their fixtures are so bad after that. Maybe it's worth trying to gain as much as possible for this gw.
Shedite27 wrote: » Grealish out of the England squad, runour that it's a personal issue, stay away for now.
extra gravy wrote: » Reguilon and Bale probably nailed on for me now after being rested tonight. Not sure what to do about Auba.
CSF wrote: » Does the percentage ownership shown on the site include transfers that have been made since the last gameweek deadline?
Ace2007 wrote: » Yea, that week that i post kane was only at like 12% ownership or what % it was, date before GW began he was at 32% - so it's a in running ownership
Cartman78 wrote: » Anyone keeping Son.....just in case in makes a Lazarus like recovery and makes an appearance at the weekend??
ShagNastii wrote: » I've 6.6 to spend on a mid. My intention is to get in Jota next week. Any mid price worth talking a punt on for the GW that's in it?
Easy Rod wrote: » Where’s this rumour coming from?
siblers wrote: » Where did you hear that?
CSF wrote: » Haven’t seen that in Villa circles, interested to hear where that is coming from