"The_Conductor;116608671” wrote: We seem to be great at giving people posts where they can stand up and pontificate about whatever takes their fancy- we have far too many people appointed to such positions already.
"The_Conductor;116608671” wrote: Why in god's name do we need a 'citizen's assembly' ontop of all the layers of bureaucracy we already have? Seems like a nice little earner for whoever gets appointed to it.......?
Beigepaint wrote: » Do you know, off the top of your head, the name of the leader (??) head (??) or gen sec (??) on the Citizens Assembly on the right to life of the unborn? I’m afraid I don’t and I would be fairly surprised if you told me that he our she makes more than a TD!
Beigepaint wrote: » The Citizens Assembly on the right to life of the unborn cut through the propaganda, the influence of the church and the influence of foreign funded crazy persons to interview thousands of Irish people to find out what Irish people think about abortion. It’s work is complete and now we have a reference document which is good for the next generation or maybe two.
Beigepaint wrote: » Wouldn’t it be nice to have a Citizens Assembly on transport and housing to: cut through the propaganda and political machines, the influence of the government inflating the market and the influence of foreign funded companies who profit from vapour locked government to interview thousands of Irish people to find out what Irish people think about where houses should be built and how many, and how we should get from there to work and back.
Beigepaint wrote: » Imagine one year elapses and its work is complete and now we have a reference document which is good for the next generation or maybe two. The white paper on housing and transport. Imagine it.
Deleted User wrote: » Nobody interested let you buy house cheaper.Lets start from there guys.
The_Conductor wrote: » From memory its Catherine Day- a former Secretary General of the EU Commission. Perhaps. However- the point I am making is why do we need another layer of bureaucracy. The Dáil and the Seanad are supposed to reflect the wishes of the people. If we need a further body to reflect the wishes of the people- obviously, the current bodies are not functioning properly. Politicians are supposed to reflect the wishes of the people- and a Ministerial Portfolio is a national portfolio- it is should not be ticket to spend silly money on vanity projects or local issues to try and bribe voters. Our current system does not work. Adding another assembly- because it works better- does not detract from the fact that the pre-existing assemblies (plr) do not work. In fact it highlights how dysfunctional the pre-existing system is. Thats the point I was trying to make (badly). Wouldn't it be nice- to not need a Citizens Assembly on anything- but to have a parliament that works- for the Irish people? How many white papers on housing have been commissioned since Peter Bacon's first report in 1996? Several. Each is gathering dust on a shelf (somewhere). Those reports were all lauded as being prescient and offering a roadmap for the future. Instead- they were seen as being politically untenable- and were shoved up onto a shelf. We need a democratic system that reflects the wishes of the Irish people- and works for the Irish people as a whole, not for small little constituencies scattered around the country. Parish-pump-politics has been the destruction of the country and will continue to be- until such time as it is dealt with. The only benefit of a Citizen's Assembly over a formal political setting- is the hundred members are not representing a formal constituency, they are random people from around the country- and politicians, members of the media or people who have made representations on matters under deliberation- are all excluded from being members- i.e. it is supposed to be a random group of Irish people, the core qualifying criterion is they have to be eligible to vote in any Irish referendums. The whole raison d'etre of the Citizens Assembly- is to reflect the wishes of a random swathe of the population. That we need a separate Citizen's Assembly- highlights the fact that the Dáil and the Seanad (to say nothing of the local authorities, county councils and various Lord Mayors etc) are completely and utterly failing to reflect the wishes of the people. This is the whole point. We need to redesign the system from the bottom up- the current structure is not fit for purpose.
Pelezico wrote: » There will be gentle inflation and no interest rate increases. That is the solution to our debt....it will be monetised and we start again. Good for mortgage holders. Bad for those on fixed income
The_Conductor wrote: » It would be nice if what you're saying came to pass- however, this is not consistent with comments from the ECB. In addition we have to balance our budget again by 2025. It ain't going to be pretty.
Pelezico wrote: » There is no other solution, certainly not interest rate increases or traditional belt tightening.
bubblypop wrote: » If she wants the country to go completely belly up, she should.
yagan wrote: » I remember the 'inflation will eat the mortgage debt" mantra back in the bubble days, and we're still waiting. That line of thinking was promoted by western demographic baby boom driving inflation, whereas it's Japan all the way from here for Europe. The Pandemic Bonds are purpose specific so unless every EZ experiences private debt issues like Ireland then there ain't going to be any strategic inflation. The EU simply has more savers than indebted.
Yurt! wrote: » They've certainly learned their lesson with bonkers asset prices, particularly with land.
yagan wrote: » Have they? From what little I understand of the Japanese situation private corporate debt became ossified, littering Japan with zombie companies like we had zombie banks. There is supposedly still a strong denial about not realising loses by corporate champions. As the domestic corporate champions were allowed to bury their losses domestic Japanese investors had to look abroad for returns, hence the Wantabes you mention. However AIB recently sold off 3,500 distressed mortgages as they know that unlike in Japan there's zero domestic support in further bailouts, so further gradual consolidation of the private debt pile is the only course left.
Yurt! wrote: » The 'tighten the belt' merchants are toying with fire. Another round of austerity like we saw post-GFC will see Italy crash and burn out of the euro and EU, probably taking countries like Spain with them. If people have twisted knickers about the 5-Star Movement and Salivini, they ain't seen nothing yet.
MacronvFrugals wrote: » I sense this premium is leading to even more discontent among the 18-34s and we all know where that’s going to lead... Off topic but this week my sister got outbid by “a state body with lots of money” according to the EA, wasn’t much only an extra 20k but it seriously pissed her off, again that 18-34 demo that are almost certain to lash out when given their next opportunity!
Tea drinker wrote: » The move from direct provision is going to be painful, a lot of Irish waiting on council houses will be leapfrogged by DP, and will continue to do so as the West is successful at manufacturing refugees. I wouldn't expect any change from this policy, and most of the 18-34 will be voting for more of the same, even if it impoverishes themselves.
JimmyVik wrote: » Cant wait to see what Sinn Fein do when they get into government and have keep all their promises plus deal with all this social burden that FF/FG are leaving on the table for them. Its going to be carnage.
cnocbui wrote: » You might want to check the cirrently buying selling thread and check back a few posts... As for Sinn Fein - shouldn't the blame lie with FF/FG, rather than pre-blaming them before they have even gotten into power?
PropQueries wrote: » That's what I don't understand. Back in January 2020, noone predicted this level of housing "shortage". We still built over 20k residential units last year (not much less than 2019). People still died (i.e. probate sales). So, why wasn't this supply shortage predicted? It wasn't predicted because it doesn't exist IMO
schmittel wrote: » This current supply shortage is surely down to covid. Not exactly an ideal time to be putting house on the market to put it mildly! I share your cynicism about the shortage hysteria, but in fairness, nobody back in Jan 2020 could have predicted the current circumstances.
PropQueries wrote: » Actually no I think both tax rises and spending cuts. The housing budget can easily be cut by just telling potential sellers or leasors that they can either agree to a lower price/rent or they will tax or regulate the bejesus out of them
schmittel wrote: » I think we might have an election before 2024!
fliball123 wrote: » There will be neither in this budget as this is the only thing keeping FF/FG in government the promise that they will not tax or cut their way out. If they back track they are gone as it will hit the majority of their voting base
fliball123 wrote: » Really so at a time when prices are going through the roof and you see it as not a good time to put a house on the market. Now is exactly the time to put it up. The future is a complete unknown but what is certain is if you put your house up on the market now you will get a lot more than you did this time last year with the ravenous demand that is out there.
mcsean2163 wrote: » https://www.myhome.ie/residential/brochure/10a-clonkeen-crescent-dun-laoghaire-co-dublin/4489546 700k for what seems to have been a corner garden with no parking seems a lot or maybe I'm not reading it right? We've two cars, so not sure at all how it'd work for us....
mcsean2163 wrote: » I think the majority of FF/FG voting base understand that you can't borrow forever...