Reputable Rog wrote: » There’s zero prospect of a Munster game. Munster have their own stadium in Limerick with much better corporate facilities. The IRFU would not be keen on effectively handing over their already depleted match day revenue to a competitor. Munster also have sponsorship deals with Diageo who have the pouring rights in Thomond, Heineken have the rights to PUC, how do you overcome that problem as well as all the box holders and their entitlements?
snotboogie wrote: » We have had this debate before and you have a very staunch "it can't be done" attitude to "foreign games" in PUC. You have completely ignored the capacity increase in PUC over TP in the potential for making money and said that a financial loss is inevitable, which isn't true. "it can't be done" Then you have taken an issue and painted it as insurmountable. You are honestly telling me that a sports team has never used another stadium with different pouring rights? This has never happened before? "it can't be done" I have a feeling that you will find more small issues and paint these as insurmountable too, when they are patently solvable. The real issue is that this ridiculous attitude is held by lots of people, many who control the stadium and will see it continue to have the worst yearly attendance to capacity ratio of any stadium opened anywhere in the world this century.
ofcork wrote: » Moving on fencing has gone up on the grand parade by the q park old tourist office being converted into a hotel iirc?
snotboogie wrote: » Name one that gets less use than PUC
Flesh Gorden wrote: » I know one: 'Bird's Nest' National Stadium in Beijing. Averages 1 glamour friendly a year and maybe 1 concert a year. They had an athletics thing in 2015 and some gaming yoke in 2017, but it makes PUC look busy in comparison. That is both bigger and less used
Reputable Rog wrote: » Sorry now but I don’t care what’s played in PUC, I also happen to be a season ticket holder for both Thomond and Musgrave so you’re pointing the fingers in the wrong direction. Finally please tell me why when the IRFU own several stadiums of their own they would opt to rent out a competitors stadium?
snotboogie wrote: » I have actually been there I visited Beijing for work in 2018, its absolutely spectacular! The local super league team play there now since workers stadium was demolished. They average 40k fans a game and play about 20 home games per year. Its also pretty unique since it is the centre piece of an Olympics, a World Championships, a Winter Olympics and will almost certainly be the key stadium for a World Cup bid soon. It also has 20k tourists through its gates every day. Maybe, maybe, in a bad year when the concerts and pre season friendlies are slow, it has a worse ratio than PUC, but like I said it is really unique in that it is a showpiece stadium for global events held in China and has more than had its day in the sun, we are really stretching if this is the only comparison for day to day usage for PUC. Because it is the only stadium capable of hosting big games in the largest city in Munster and it's the only stadium in the province that could host a home ERC semi final. Most importantly, the onus should be on Cork GAA not Munster (or me!) to figure out how to make use of an asset that they received public land and funding for. The reason they got the funding was to bring events to the city. Right now they are sitting on valuable land with an expensive asset that we have helped to pay for and they are not using it. I can't overstate how poorly utilised the stadium is; in 2019 there were, I believe, only 3 games where over 10k people attended; 30k for a Limerick Hurling game, 26k for a Waterford Hurling game and 18k for a Kerry football game. Thats an annual sporting attendance of 74k in a 45k capacity stadium. That was supplemented by one concert with a 35k attendance. It didn't come close to being filled once. Musgrave Park, with a capacity of 8k, actually had more people through its gates in 2019, with 50k attending Munster and Ireland under 20 games and 65k attending concerts there.
Reputable Rog wrote: » Thurles and the Gaelic Grounds are actually bigger if size is your thing.
Mardyke wrote: » If there was one 25,000 seat stadium with modern corporate facilities, it would satisfy the need of Cork, Munster and City.
snotboogie wrote: » The only time it has been filled was for a game that Cork GAA actively tried to block taking place there.
Markcheese wrote: » It depends what the carpark is for , I suspect it's nothing to do with matchdays , it's probably more for conference facilities , In fact I could see the car park having to be closed for match days ... Always thought pairc ui caoimh needed a really good park and ride or at least some kind of bus service , preferably up the marina ,as much to get people away from the stadium as to it. ..
Curb Your Enthusiasm wrote: » The new BE hourly 212 bus service serves Kent Station, and the city to the areas adjacent to the stadium along with a stop nearby the stadium itself. New Marina car park, including the dreadful 'grasscrete' already has tons of car parking spaces anyway.
snotboogie wrote: » Of course, but there are too many good GAA men who can't tolerate sharing. Here is the BMO Field in Toronto with a capacity of 30k. Its 2016 renovation was cheaper than PUC's at $120m CAD. It has retractable stands and has a field length of 135 metres, which could accommodate GAA games. This would have been ideal for Cork:
marno21 wrote: » Custom House Tower appealed....http://www.pleanala.ie/casenum/308596.htm
Irish Examiner wrote: Tower Development Properties Ltd is awaiting the outcome of an appeal on plans to build a 34-storey skyscraper, as well as a commercial, retail and tourism complex on the site of the historic Revenue building on Custom House Quay. The plan includes a 140m-tall tower, with a 241-bedroom hotel and 25 serviced hotel suites over 34 storeys, as well as commercial elements and a museum/visitor centre, which will pay heed to the site’s maritime heritage.Cork City Council granted planning permission last October by Cork City Council, but appeals from the Irish Georgian Society, An Taisce, Sean Feehan and John Adams saw this referred to An Bord Pleanála. The board is due to report its decision by March 22.
Shedite27 wrote: » 30k would have been too small for a lot of the games it wants to host, and the concerts it wants to host. I understand they seem like a bad investment for non-GAA people but every kid in Cork (myself included) grows up dreaming of playing in PUC. It's a huge marketing tool for GAA. It's also got good use for conferences, business breakfasts etc. Every city needs a stadium that can put on concerts.
Deleted User wrote: » It is a bad investment from a public money standpoint.
Shedite27 wrote: » How much public money went to it V GAA funded?
Apogee wrote: » Decision due next Monday:
hans aus dtschl wrote: » Outside of the public money directly handed over, it's very hard to put a value on lands which were CPO'd many decades ago and then given over at zero-cost to the private organisation. How much is the "centre of excellence" (AKA future hotel) land beside PUC worth to them? I'd say quite a lot. How much did they pay? I don't believe they paid anything, but am willing to be proven wrong. The land value could be in the millions, realistically. How much is the new car park worth to them? I'm not against PUC or the GAA, and I have been in the new stadium a few times and think it looks good. But handing over public land to a private organisation does not sit well with me. Particularly when that particular organisation is...eh...a little bit secretive about its own usages of money. And even more when that organisation has a really bad attitude towards both transportation in the city centre, and compliance with planning.
Deleted User wrote: » I've been to several conferences at the Aviva, never needed to drive there. PUC is a short walk, from the city, or a very small taxi fare on a corporate card
timmyjimmy wrote: » I've been to conferences at PuC. I've cycled down and drove down, most of my Irish colleagues drove down. Our American counterparts walked down or got a taxi down. There was probably 300 at the conference all in. There was enough parking around the stadium for our conference albeit on the small side. Public transport is essential to make it more attractive for conferences albeit the powers that be think it's a car park that's needed.