awsah wrote: » if you tell me a paper the crystallisation one came up i can send you the sample answer i have for it.
Aoife5 wrote: » Thank you so much !!! The crystallisation one came up in March 2020
bluerthanu wrote: » Both estoppel and UI came up in November.
DUMSURFER wrote: » Is there anyone who did a Criminal Law course this cycle that would be willing to swap/share with me some of the lecture notes they have? The notes I'm working off are two years old, and I'm missing some important recent developments/cases. Just need a few up-to-date bits to cover myself! I have notes for every subject (including City Colleges notes for EU and Constitutional) that I'm more than happy to share with anyone able who can help!
LawStudent999 wrote: » Hi guys, just looking for a bit of help in the area of Corporate Borrowing for Company. I suppose my question is whether there’s a key piece to know amongst the material. It seems very expansive and I’m unsure as to the key point of focus? Is there a particular topic within the chapter that I should be focusing on e.g. Crystallisation of Floating Charges/ ROT Clauses? Thanks in advance
bluerthanu wrote: » I'm not sure I would leave out/focus too much on any particular area unfortunately. The way it appears is: (1) essay on crystallisation of a floating charge (plus maybe the nature of a floating charge); (2) PQ that generally will either combine some combination of (a) fixed charge over books debts, (b) fixed charge that has or has not been registered, (c) retention of title clause (I think all sums due is the most common); and (3) an essay on the most significant changes to registration. A crystallisation essay came up in March 20 (but is very popular). If I was to wager an uneducated guess, I would think an October 18 type PQ that combined a fixed charge on book debts and a retention of title clause would be the most likely (purely on the basis that it was an essay the last time it appeared and RoT clauses haven't appeared since Oct 18).
Kellyg248 wrote: » Anyone having difficulty downloading the Proctoria? Screensharing is prooving impossible. I have contacted the Law Society and waiting.... Thank you
FE1Hopefully1 wrote: » When it pops up to click share you click the bit that looks like a screen and then hit share
Kellyg248 wrote: » That is the issue the 'share' option is not available.
nicolesd wrote: » can anyone clarify the rights of unmarried fathers in constitutional law? am i right in saying they enjoy no constitutional rights to their children per Nicaolou they do not outside of marriage enjoy the same rights? they can apply for guardianship but thats not a constitutional right and what other cases would you use? also wondering position of de facto familys and a sister of grandmother trying to gain rights of a child over a unmarried father? i know its been said de facto familys are not recognised by irish law but what cases would you use for that? im slightly confused if a problem came up could someone please clarify for me?
JPEGJULY wrote: » Has anyone else still not received an email from Better Examinations about setting up their account for this sitting? I emailed the Law Society earlier this week and they said they would ask Better Examinations to send it again but still there is nothing in my inbox or spam folder. Just feel like I am cutting it quite close now at this stage with no thanks to the Law Society's awful communication.
