Kellyg248 wrote: » That is the issue the 'share' option is not available.
FE1Hopefully1 wrote: » When it pops up to click share you click the bit that looks like a screen and then hit share
Kellyg248 wrote: » Anyone having difficulty downloading the Proctoria? Screensharing is prooving impossible. I have contacted the Law Society and waiting.... Thank you
bluerthanu wrote: » I'm not sure I would leave out/focus too much on any particular area unfortunately. The way it appears is: (1) essay on crystallisation of a floating charge (plus maybe the nature of a floating charge); (2) PQ that generally will either combine some combination of (a) fixed charge over books debts, (b) fixed charge that has or has not been registered, (c) retention of title clause (I think all sums due is the most common); and (3) an essay on the most significant changes to registration. A crystallisation essay came up in March 20 (but is very popular). If I was to wager an uneducated guess, I would think an October 18 type PQ that combined a fixed charge on book debts and a retention of title clause would be the most likely (purely on the basis that it was an essay the last time it appeared and RoT clauses haven't appeared since Oct 18).
LawStudent999 wrote: » Hi guys, just looking for a bit of help in the area of Corporate Borrowing for Company. I suppose my question is whether there’s a key piece to know amongst the material. It seems very expansive and I’m unsure as to the key point of focus? Is there a particular topic within the chapter that I should be focusing on e.g. Crystallisation of Floating Charges/ ROT Clauses? Thanks in advance
DUMSURFER wrote: » Is there anyone who did a Criminal Law course this cycle that would be willing to swap/share with me some of the lecture notes they have? The notes I'm working off are two years old, and I'm missing some important recent developments/cases. Just need a few up-to-date bits to cover myself! I have notes for every subject (including City Colleges notes for EU and Constitutional) that I'm more than happy to share with anyone able who can help!
bluerthanu wrote: » Both estoppel and UI came up in November.
Aoife5 wrote: » Thank you so much !!! The crystallisation one came up in March 2020
awsah wrote: » if you tell me a paper the crystallisation one came up i can send you the sample answer i have for it.
Aoife5 wrote: » Does anyone have a sample answer done for company on the circumstances when a floating charge will crystallise or for March 2016 essay question “the companies act 2014 makes 3 significant changes to the registration of company charges: first, in relation to the definition of charges that are required to be registered....”. Would really appreciate it!!
AA247 wrote: » Estoppel is by far easiest, only proprietary is examined, sometimes with unconscionability if I remember correctly. There are basic principles and a few leading cases, once you know them you will be fine. I literally read over this chapter and did desperately short notes before exam in March 20 just in case. Got 46% in the exam but actually scored the highest like 13/20 I think in that question which took least amount of time to study. Under Influence can come up in up in different varieties from dealing with family members to banks with different cases needed for different questions. Estoppel didn’t come up in November 20. Not sure about undue influence.
NewFe1 wrote: » Have you got a link to this case? I have the City Colleges 2019/20 manual as well as the Independent Colleges 2020 manual and there isn't a mention of it in either. You'd think they would have added it in.
awsah wrote: » You can't answer a question on undue delay without referring to the case of DPP v CC [2019] which stated that undue delay is a matter for trial Court. they created a new test which distinguishes between cases of lost opportuinity and a loss of an obviously useful line of defence so if you were answering a problem question on this area you would need to use that test
