lurleen lumpkin wrote: » Back to circular arguments and IRA whataboutery every 5 minutes then. What does he get out of trolling this thread relentlessly? He took the time to beg to get back in just so he can furnish us with his on this day the IRA nuggets and advise us on how British we are.
Baggly wrote: » Mod After discussion with the user via PM, downcow's threadban is lifted.
maccored wrote: » i bet you would have called people born in India british too back in the day. remember that place where the british decimated and stole the linen trade from the 1830s on? then again, 'british' is only a word. doesnt actually mean anything.
downcow wrote: » Those born in the north were born british but I guess most took up their offer to declare as Irish. Still british though.
jh79 wrote: » Francie Brady, hasn't posted in any of the usual threads in a while.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » Francie who?
jh79 wrote: » How come Francie isn't posting these days?
Hamsterchops wrote: » Apart from being a Northern Ireland Unionist of the moderate variety, what has Downcow done to deserve being banned from this thread?
Hamsterchops wrote: » As a matter of interest, who gains and who loses out in the event of a "United" Ireland? Who are the winners and who are the losers? I guess GB is the real winner, with not having to maintain NI as part of the UK anymore, but what of NI themselves, would they be winners or losers after leaving the UK? And what of us here in the South? Obviously we'd be in some kind of United Ireland heaven of for a short spell ... then the reality would set in, and I guess we'd have some king of massive hangover as it slowly dawn's on us that the reality may not be the same as the pipe dream
Baggly wrote: » Mod downcow, you are done in this thread. Dont post here again.
RobMc59 wrote: » It also depends on who has to pay for a UI which would be expensive I imagine.
bobbysands81 wrote: » It’s precisely that attitude towards “Irishness” that will actually speed up a United Ireland.
lurleen lumpkin wrote: » Glad the penny finally dropped for you.
Junkyard Tom wrote: » So the IRA were British. Gerry Adams is British. Martin McGuinness was British.
BloodyBill wrote: » The only two guys that complain about anti Irish abuse in Britain are from Derry. The footballers McLean and Duffy. Its all abit odd.
downcow wrote: » You have now got it. The penny has dropped. It is a fact that someone like you born in Derry can be referred to as Irish from birth and can then identify as Irish pretty much as soon as you can write Now we are in agreement Of course if you want to be very factual, you were born in Londonderry, but derry is a logical shortened affectionate nickname for it
Junkyard Tom wrote: » This is it exactly. There is no point in trying to find a reasonable Unionism, the closest thing to it is Alliance party type neutrality. Unionists should stop fooling themselves that Ireland was ever 'as British as Finchley' because no part ever was. They could paint every kerb in the north red-white-and-blue and put a Union Fleg on every lamppost and it would still be Ireland. Growing up time for Unionism.
RobMc59 wrote: » Weren't you originally from NI Tom?Which would make you British by birth.
downcow wrote: » I note your name. And it’s terrorists like the one you eulogise with your name
lurleen lumpkin wrote: » The fact that someone like me born in Derry would be referred to as Irish from birth and then identify as Irish pretty much as soon as they could write does seem to be a pain the arse for you. It's something very straightforward that a lot of us here have been trying to tell you. Maybe go away and try to understand that simple fact and when you come back you might have a bit more success trying to debate with people here.
RobMc59 wrote: » It hasn't gone unnoticed that the most vocal on these UI/anti British threads regarding this subject are usually British by birth and have chosen to identify as Irish in later life. Do you acknowledge that you were British by birth and have exercised your right to identify as Irish?