Ryan G wrote: » For criminal would it be okay to leave out bail, arrest, detention and the courts? Really don’t think I can get them in at this stage.
WesternC123 wrote: » Constitutional - What are people concentrating on for Trial in Due Course? Also, I did the practice exam this morning and had the same thing happen when I tried to submit the exam - it just kept loading, going to the home page and then refreshing. I didn't get the congratulations notification. I rang the law soc and they said it's because it's a practice exam although I don't really see what that would make a difference..did anyone else try to contact them about it?
ullaw22 wrote: » Hey all! Would anyone have the March 2020 and November 2020 Property papers? Would be hugely appreciated - even if not the papers themselves an idea of what came up
FE1Hopefully1 wrote: » November Q1- Critically evaluate the legislative protection afforded spouses in relation to family property in Ireland. Support your answer with reference to appropriate authority. Q2- problem q on easements of necessity Q3-Should the contractual licence be regarded as an interest in land in Irish LawJ Discuss your answer with reference to applicable case law. Q4-problem q re section 117 Q5- According to Wylie, One of the most striking features of our land law has been the extent to which it has been influenced by principles of equity Irish Land Law )j p.71. Critically discuss the above statement, supporting your answer with relevant legal authority. Q6-problem on adverse possession Q7 In order for a will to be valid, there are a number of capacity and formality requirements which must be adhered to in accordance with the Succession Act 176’. Critically discuss these requirements supporting your answer with suf9cient and relevant case law. Q8 - problem on finding
AA247 wrote: » Thanks for this! Do you know if this was same examiner as March 2020? Not as much choice
FE1Hopefully1 wrote: » Oh sorry I’ve no idea can’t remember what it said and doesn’t say it on the front of my paper !
ullaw22 wrote: » Thanks so much, both! The two papers are nice but March gives honestly a startling amount of choice. A tad bizarre for contractual licences to get two runs out in the one year too but it's a nice little topic imo. Would give my left arm for either of these papers on the 30th tbh!
AA247 wrote: » Anyone have November 2020 Company paper or can outline what was on it?
corbrian1998 wrote: » Can anyone tell me if for company I should be covered with changes in company’s act 2014, SLP, Adv and Dis of Incorporation, Corporate Authority, Directors Duties, Restriction, Corporate Borrowing/Charges, Share Transfer, Winding Up, Distribution of Assets, Examinership, Receivership?
Hamerzan Sickles wrote: » This is fantastic, thanks so much for linking it. Would you - or anyone else - have any other academic commentary/articles on some of the more frequently examined topics in Constitutional?
fe12020oct wrote: » anyone have any advice for undue delay in due course of law and which cases should be focused on?
jjjjjop wrote: » Which is better and easier to cover in equity - estoppel or undue influence? I only have time to cover the one
awsah wrote: » You can't answer a question on undue delay without referring to the case of DPP v CC [2019] which stated that undue delay is a matter for trial Court. they created a new test which distinguishes between cases of lost opportuinity and a loss of an obviously useful line of defence so if you were answering a problem question on this area you would need to use that test
NewFe1 wrote: » Have you got a link to this case? I have the City Colleges 2019/20 manual as well as the Independent Colleges 2020 manual and there isn't a mention of it in either. You'd think they would have added it in.
AA247 wrote: » Estoppel is by far easiest, only proprietary is examined, sometimes with unconscionability if I remember correctly. There are basic principles and a few leading cases, once you know them you will be fine. I literally read over this chapter and did desperately short notes before exam in March 20 just in case. Got 46% in the exam but actually scored the highest like 13/20 I think in that question which took least amount of time to study. Under Influence can come up in up in different varieties from dealing with family members to banks with different cases needed for different questions. Estoppel didn’t come up in November 20. Not sure about undue influence.
Aoife5 wrote: » Does anyone have a sample answer done for company on the circumstances when a floating charge will crystallise or for March 2016 essay question “the companies act 2014 makes 3 significant changes to the registration of company charges: first, in relation to the definition of charges that are required to be registered....”. Would really appreciate it!!
