biko wrote: » We can't stop the worst of Islam to happen everywhere, but we can stop it here.
Deleted User wrote: » While I agree in part, I actually think that ship has sailed. The time to have done that would have been a decade or two ago, when numbers were more manageable. There's just too much focus on allowing other cultures to behave as they wish.. as a right for them to behave as they wish..
jmreire wrote: » Democracy will be the death of democracy........
Deleted User wrote: » Yes and no. I don't think democracy in it's current form is likely to survive, nor should it. The average punter has very little actual influence, when it comes down to one party being ousted for a few years, for another party with similar lukewarm differences, and a disinterest in truly representing people. Most western democracies have gone the way of representing the elite, the truly wealthy, and the corporations.. so I suspect we'll see an eruption of emotions at some point, with very destructive results. There seems to be a pattern in human civilisations along these lines, which is exaggerated now due to the internet, and the similarities within all western cultures. There will likely be a pushback at some point when it comes to non-western cultures. An expulsion of foreign ideas that run counter to what real people want to embrace, and more importantly, to support or even tolerate. People seem to forget that we've already had this happen before in other countries in one form or another. Fascism was just one example of it. There's been plenty of other expressions along similar lines.
jmreire wrote: » I agree 100%, and theres no better example of it than American style democracy,,effectively big corporations run America. no doubt about it. But what I mean is that here in Ireland and in other "Democratic " western nations, foreigners are allowed to bring their own culture with them, and actively propagate it and to change our native culture, in a way that would not be tolerated in the Countrys that they come from....largely because they don't allow "Democracy".
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » It seems so straight forward and fair on the host population.
Deleted User wrote: » I actually had a conversation along these lines with my brother last night. He lived in England for close to two decades, then France, and finally settled in Spain. Now he's back in Ireland after experiencing some of what Europe has to offer, and he's actually quite bitter over how he was treated. As an Irish person, and his wife an English person. We like to think of western culture of a bloc of similar culture, and values. There are gigantic differences in attitudes and behaviors between Northern, and Southern Europe. The South is far more corrupt, more flexible with honesty, and are more likely to make friends for the sake of some perceived benefit. Whereas the North is far closer to a regulated society, a willingness to censor themselves, etc. And then, Ireland and Britain are somewhere in the middle. Few countries in the world are truly welcoming to foreigners. Not simply welcoming but accepting without reservations. The Ireland of my youth was very much that way. Oh sure, young people and activists go on about the "far right" in Ireland, but compared to other nations there is extremely little racial superiority going on here. We simply don't have the history, or culture to tolerate it. And yes, we have our degrees of racism towards Travellers, but frankly, they've brought it upon themselves, in the face of a myriad attempts to integrate them into mainstream society. The truth is most countries see foreigners as foreigners. Race is part of it, but nationality is a greater factor. It's amazing how fragmented European countries are whether it's France with people identifying with Normandy, and Burgundy. Or any number of other allegiance that people still manage to hold going back hundreds of years. Spain being an excellent example, with the anger and distrust that the north has for the south, the dislike everyone has for Madrid, even distrust between neighboring states, going back to unification period. It's common throughout Europe, especially in the South, but it's something that extends to other Europeans. IMHO Ireland is, or was, the most welcoming and accepting nation in Europe. England made a stab at it but they had too many issues with colonialism for it to truly succeed, although they've done pretty well, all things considered. However, I suspect that honeymoon period of welcoming by Irish people is coming to an end. And perhaps, it's a good thing that Irish people are starting to lose that innocence, because God knows, others will take advantage of it.
BensMixed wrote: » I think you've got a pretty warped sense of reality if that's what you really think. People are not sitting there judging you immediately as a foreigner to the point where you become this disillusioned. If I met someone in real life who thought like this I think I'd run a mile. That might have something to do with your brothers situation if you share the same mindset. I think views like this would be a self fulfilling prophecy and lead to a lonely existence.
BensMixed wrote: » I think you've got a pretty warped sense of reality if that's what you really think.
People are not sitting there judging you immediately as a foreigner to the point where you become this disillusioned. If I met someone in real life who thought like this I think I'd run a mile. That might have something to do with your brothers situation if you share the same mindset. I think views like this would be a self fulfilling prophecy and lead to a lonely existence.
TomTomTim wrote: » It's funny how "lived experiences", something often pushed by people like yourself in regard to claims from minorities, is only a concept applied to minorities. Why is that? What is it about a minorities perception of something that makes it worth more than a native Europeans? If klaz was speaking about a minority experiencing racism, and someone denied it, you'd be outraged. Yet a native makes a similar claim, and you rush to downplay it.
Deleted User wrote: » Right back at you... but then, you haven't defended your previous points, so I suspect you're just here spouting impulses rather than engaging in a discussion. I think you're remarkably naive, or probably just have very limited experience of living abroad. Likely your total experience is based on living in Ireland, and so, you look at the world through the lens of Irish culture, and that acceptance that most Irish people have towards other groups. So.. are you going to defend your past statements?
TomTomTim wrote: » I'm not too sure what I think of this. It's good that they are reacting to the problem, but at the same time it seems that they are reacting too late.
TomTomTim wrote: » https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1372206458784337922 I'm not too sure what I think of this. It's good that they are reacting to the problem, but at the same time it seems that they are reacting too late.
Deleted User wrote: » Can you imagine what sort of social cohesion we will have if Coveney's 2040 plan goes ahead.
Sand wrote: » It seems unworkable. Are they going to dictate where people live with ethnic quotas? You have to presume any such authoritarian measures are going to collapse under the slightest legal challenge unless there is a significant reset to the constitutional framework of the country and indeed the EU.
Mules wrote: » I wonder are a lot of the Danish announcements meant to deter people from coming in the first place? A bit like the hostile environment in the UK under Theresa May.
jmreire wrote: » Well if May had a "hostile" attitude to migrants / asylum seekers, see what Priti Patel has coming down the line..No asylum/migration applications accepted on the British mainland,,,,,current and all future applicants must apply from other Countrys or off shore islands. And straight off, all asylum seekers etc. passing through a safe 3rd Country, will be automatically denied entry, and deported. Possible "processing centres include Ascension Island, Gibralter,Isle of Man and other offshore Islands. Article is on the Guardian.
Deleted User wrote: » It's funny how the legal immigrants and children of legal immigrants are so often the toughest when it comes to cracking down on illegal migrants. They truly know the struggle and the hoops their families had to jump through to get to Western countries. They understand the precedent and consequences that would be set from allowing people to jump the queue.