nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) No trading

Tom Young

This is the new FE1 Exam Thread

This is a link to the old one: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055143169

This is a link to the next one: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056907164

Sorry, I'm aware we are in the throws of FE1 season, but due to a server issue, a new thread was required. Old chats and posts below - Thanks!

Mod warning in post #1205: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=88514663&postcount=1205

Mod warning in post #2555: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91819622&postcount=2555

Mod warning in post #2593: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=92025688&postcount=2593

Moderator: The above warnings mean it is not ok to buy, sell or swap (trade) any exam materials in this thread. Exam grids are the only exception. You may request and exchange exam grids but at no point will money be allowed to change hands for them.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

jcarroll9

For equity, what do you need to have covered for the case note Q? Any help appreciated!

FEONE

Hi all, for company law is it necessary to cover both restriction and disqualification? Do people have any preference over which one should be studied?

examsfe12021

would anybody recommend the UCD seminar for constitutional? What does it usually entail?

Katniss1998

CoconutHeadMia wrote: »

Thank you. Is it necessary to cover other topics like winding up examinership and receivership with it or could you get a whole question just on realisation of assets?

As far as I am aware, it comes up on its own but I haven't studied it in detail yet. I would say have a look at the exam reports because they are very detailed so should give a steer on how to answer them.

Katniss1998

FEONE wrote: »

Hi all, for company law is it necessary to cover both restriction and disqualification? Do people have any preference over which one should be studied?

Generally, restriction comes up I believe. So I am just studying that.

NewFe1

Is Capital Maintenance worth covering? Never seems to come up

L.E.D

awsah wrote: »

here you go

Thabk you so so much

FEONE

NewFe1 wrote: »

Is Capital Maintenance worth covering? Never seems to come up

I am not covering it.
I was thinking of covering changes brought about by Companies Act, Corporate Capacity Ultra Vires, SLP, Directors, Corporate Borrowing, Share Transfer, Shareholder Protection, Restriction, Realisation of Assets, Examinership, and Receivership. If anyone has anything that I should add could you please let me know!

Katniss1998

NewFe1 wrote: »

Is Capital Maintenance worth covering? Never seems to come up

I am not studying it.

Fe1user5555

Would any kind soul please tell me what they are covering for tort? Am drowning in it

jjjjjop

Is nervous shock/pre economic loss due a run? does anyone have any predictions for tort ?

Iso_123

What general principles for EU does everyone have? I have fundamental rights, proportionality, legal certainty, supremacy and subsidiarity. Is it worth learning conferral and legitimate expectations too?

fe120202021

might be a silly of me, but i was thinking of avoiding the case note question in constitutional because i'm not sure how to prepare for it. Is there any sort of repetition or predictability for it or how are people preparing for it? any tips are welcome

nicolesd

can anyone clear up the Quinn supermarket case for me in constitutional law for freedom of religion? re the exemption for kosher meat stores to open on the sundays was this held unconstitutional as total ban went to far but justified then for freedom to practise religion religion and allowed open for free hours to accommodate the sabbath?

awsah

nicolesd wrote: »

can anyone clear up the Quinn supermarket case for me in constitutional law for freedom of religion? re the exemption for kosher meat stores to open on the sundays was this held unconstitutional as total ban went to far but justified then for freedom to practise religion religion and allowed open for free hours to accommodate the sabbath?

(Jewish butchers)

Primary purpose of Art 44 was to allow the free practice and profession of religion, therefore the discrimination was necessary.

In this case, a ministerial order granted an exmption to Jewish meat shops from the restricted opening hours applicable to butcher shop Despite the prohibition against religious discrimination in Article 44.2.3, the Court upheld the discrimination as it was necessary in order to allow the free practice of the Jewish religion as guaranteed by Article 44.2. The Court looked at the primary purpose of Article 44 and believed its primary purpose was to allow the free practice and profession of religion.

KingofTheFE1s

fe120202021 wrote: »

might be a silly of me, but i was thinking of avoiding the case note question in constitutional because i'm not sure how to prepare for it. Is there any sort of repetition or predictability for it or how are people preparing for it? any tips are welcome

It seems to always take the form of two older seminal cases and two recent ones. Other than that I dont see any form of repetition. Pretty hard to prepare for imo. Its gona be a backup of sorts for me. May attempt it if Im struggling for a decent fifth out of the other options.

Lightup1

fe120202021 wrote: »

might be a silly of me, but i was thinking of avoiding the case note question in constitutional because i'm not sure how to prepare for it. Is there any sort of repetition or predictability for it or how are people preparing for it? any tips are welcome

I sat constitutional in the last round. I knew one of the cases and vaguely knew a second and managed to pull a pass mark in the question. Difficult question to prepare for yes but at the same if you're stuck in the exam, wouldn't completely disregard it.

Mc96

I just did the practice exam. At the end of the exams in November a little window used to pop up saying "congratulations on submitting your exam". This time when I clicked to submit etc, that window didn't pop up and it seemed to refresh on better examinations main page about 3 times before settling. It does say that the exam is submitted waiting review. I'm just wondering if anyone did get the congratulations message? Just to make sure there isn't some glitch with mine!

tippertruck

Mc96 wrote: »

I just did the practice exam. At the end of the exams in November a little window used to pop up saying "congratulations on submitting your exam". This time when I clicked to submit etc, that window didn't pop up and it seemed to refresh on better examinations main page about 3 times before settling. It does say that the exam is submitted waiting review. I'm just wondering if anyone did get the congratulations message? Just to make sure there isn't some glitch with mine!

I didn’t get a congratulations either..

awsah

https://www.childrensrights.ie/sites/default/files/submissions_reports/files/Alan%20DP%20Brady%20-%20Childrens%20Constitutional%20Rights%20-%206%20Dec%202018.pdf

This is a good article for constitutional if an essay question on the Children's Rights referendum was to come up. the case below has a lot of information as well, the Judge refers to the principle of proportionality in child care proceedings as enshrined in the Constitution by Article 42A.2.1

https://www.childlawproject.ie/publications/high-court-quashes-emergency-care-order-for-newborn-removed-at-birth-as-disproportionate/#:~:text=birth%20as%20disproportionate-,High%20Court%20quashes%20emergency%20care%20order%20for%20newborn%20removed%20at,a%20day%20after%20his%20birth.&text=An%20order%20of%20certiorari%20was%20made%20quashing%20the%20ECO.

catonafence

Mc96 wrote: »

I just did the practice exam. At the end of the exams in November a little window used to pop up saying "congratulations on submitting your exam". This time when I clicked to submit etc, that window didn't pop up and it seemed to refresh on better examinations main page about 3 times before settling. It does say that the exam is submitted waiting review. I'm just wondering if anyone did get the congratulations message? Just to make sure there isn't some glitch with mine!

I got the message "Congratulations!
You have successfully submitted your exam. We'll let you know as soon as your feedback is ready."

Hamerzan Sickles

awsah wrote: »

https://www.childrensrights.ie/sites/default/files/submissions_reports/files/Alan%20DP%20Brady%20-%20Childrens%20Constitutional%20Rights%20-%206%20Dec%202018.pdf

This is a good article for constitutional if an essay question on the Children's Rights referendum was to come up. the case below has a lot of information as well, the Judge refers to the principle of proportionality in child care proceedings as enshrined in the Constitution by Article 42A.2.1

https://www.childlawproject.ie/publications/high-court-quashes-emergency-care-order-for-newborn-removed-at-birth-as-disproportionate/#:~:text=birth%20as%20disproportionate-,High%20Court%20quashes%20emergency%20care%20order%20for%20newborn%20removed%20at,a%20day%20after%20his%20birth.&text=An%20order%20of%20certiorari%20was%20made%20quashing%20the%20ECO.

This is fantastic, thanks so much for linking it.

Would you - or anyone else - have any other academic commentary/articles on some of the more frequently examined topics in Constitutional?

catonafence

Hi, EU question.
I have institutions
general principles,
Sources of law
direct effect
judicial review
ms liability
FMOG
preliminary ref. Procedure.
I know I need at least one more topic - would love some thoughts as to whether I should add the rest of the 4 freedoms or try to learn art 101 and 102 ? Thanks so much,

lsheehaneire

FMOW and citizenship

catonafence

Thanks, finally got one child back to school this morning but unexpectedly having 3 at home since Christmas has killed my routine so I’m a little behind - running out of time to get to all the topics.

Fe123

I logged onto better examinations yesterday for a few mins & I tried to log on this morning but when I click rejoin exam nothing happens. Did anyone else have this issue or know why it’s happening?

lsheehaneire

snap ..me too! all 3 back today ..FINALLY a little head space :-)

Ryan G

For criminal would it be okay to leave out bail, arrest, detention and the courts? Really don’t think I can get them in at this stage.

L.E.D

Anyone else's practice exam just say 'loading exam' trying to work out if its the laptop or the exam

lawgrad49

Fe123 wrote: »

I logged onto better examinations yesterday for a few mins & I tried to log on this morning but when I click rejoin exam nothing happens. Did anyone else have this issue or know why it’s happening?

I'm having the same issue, it worked okay for me Saturday when I logged in for half an hour or so. I tried to rejoin exam this morning and it won't let me. Would it be that the 3.5 hours have now expired and we don't have access?

There is a practice exam feature on the platform anyway, I just wanted to play around with some of the tools, but you can do it on that so it's not really an issue.