ihatethesea wrote: » For constitutional law, I'm thinking of leaving out fair procedures, does anyone think that's a terrible idea and that it's a must?
L.E.D wrote: » Does anyone have the November 2020 criminal paper? I seen the post with all past papers (thank you!) But it stops in March 2020 Thanks
yipyop wrote: » Wondering if anyone knows what spellcheck function will work for the exams? I had Grammarly installed last time but I think the system blocked it.
nmurphy1441 wrote: » Res ipsa loquitur essay is handy enough so I’ll have one prepared just incase and he could be due a run. Don’t think it has been up in 2/3 sittings but I stand to be corrected on that!
NewFe1 wrote: » Has a question ever come up on the duty to seek out and preserve evidence? Or has it even been part of a question? Seems a fairly big topic with lots of developments and case law but can't seem to find any past paper questions on it.
Iconic10 wrote: » just realized i haven’t received the email from better examinations ?! anyone else ?
Fe179user wrote: » I was unsure whether to do res ispa loquitur? I will def be doing the same and defamation is due a turn and nervous shock!
awsah wrote: » The only thing I will say is that those two are spaced apart on the time table. if you looked over tort this weekend and then threw yourself into constitutional from Monday,that give you about 8 days of study for that and then about a week after for tort and if you just start learning off you should get enough done. could you message your master's professors and say you need to take these next 3 weeks off, that you can attend classes but ask for an extension on any homework? can work give you any time off to study? I totally feel you though, I am doing 4 with a full time job and I think I have taken on too much, I was thinking during the week of only doing 2 or 3 but I just decided to give it a go and hopefully I get all four
nmurphy1441 wrote: » It’s very tough! For tort anyway... I’ll definitely be covering medicial neg, defamation, res ipsa loquitur, damages, occupiers, nuisance, product, trespass the person and DOC in general. I think some of these are due a run and I’ll go back over the grid and pick out more closer the time.
nicolesd wrote: » For SOP are people covering judicial power? or what exactly within the judicial power are people focusing on it seems so long i was wondering to leave it out or cover it? also for the executive power i just have cabinet confidentiality done and referenda are people imcluding international relations too? it also seems so long i dont know if i will get time to cover it all!! feeling so overwhelmed!!
bigchungus wrote: » Someone posted a google drive with all the past papers/sample answers a few pages back
CoconutHeadMia wrote: » I was thinking; Offer & Acceptance Consideration Estoppel Privity Misrepresentation Terms Remedies Consumer Protection Illegal contracts Undue influence Discharge Is there anything I have left out?
DFMCD190384 wrote: » Contract Hi all, has anyone any predictions for Contract? Really stressing out over this one.
