Fe179user wrote: » I’m thinking of switching from 2 FE1s to just doing 1 FE1 as I think it’s too heavy right now with work and a masters degree (I did 3 in November but burned out massively after). Does anyone know if I contact the law society can I get a refund if I decide to sit just 1 instead of 2 I applied for?
examsfe12021 wrote: » equity hey would people think its safe to leave out constructive and resulting trusts and trustees ??
123456789j wrote: » Guys has anyone got any predictions/bankers for constitutional? Also would appreciate any tips for the exam and how the exam is generally marked
nmurphy1441 wrote: » I’m not certain but I highly doubt it!!! What two are you sitting?
Fe179user wrote: » Constitutional and tort law - they’re both really content heavy and I’m quite worried
fe1fi20 wrote: » hey lads, do you think the UCD constitutional seminar thing would be worth it for the exam? really trying to buckle down constitutional law
Fedone wrote: » Eoin Carolan is the examiner and he loves recent case law which the seminar is based on. I’m going to be cramming whatever he mentions in the seminar because I know people who’ve done the same for past exams and passed. Not saying it’s a guarantee but it’s as close as we can get in an exam as unpredictable as constitutional.
fe1fi20 wrote: » thanks, you've just convinced me to pay for it lol
lsheehaneire wrote: » I have also paid for it, can’t do any harm.
DUMSURFER wrote: » Do you get the notes straight away or do you have to wait until the day?
lsheehaneire wrote: » No just signed up for the online seminar.
Zlatorog wrote: » Hey, bit of a "how long is a piece of string" question here but roughly how many cases should I be looking at per answer for property? I'm currently going through succession and I feel the manual is just riddled with caselaw ratios and very little by way of facts. I also note from the reports that the examiner isn't too keen on just listing cases without some context, so I could do with a steer on keeping the balance right. Thanks!
nmurphy1441 wrote: » I was really hoping you weren’t going to say both of them! I can’t comment on constitutional because I haven’t sat that yet but tort can be tough! If you’re that worried, just try to be as selective as you can with topics. Luck is a part of these exams too I think. I work full time (mostly about 60 hours a week including overtime), I don’t have any undergrad in law or anything for that matter! I passed the preliminary exam the law society offers and started the FE1s straight away. I’ve a child running around looking for my attention every time I go to study! Just knuckle down as much as you can, you’ll get there!
Fe179user wrote: » Do you have to be a ucd student to attend this?
Fe179user wrote: » It’s so hard to cut anything down I might go for doing basic notes for a few topics and in depth for more common topics but it’s hard to even know, I did company property and contract in November and they were more predictable than these two and it’s just stressing me out! I feel for you though with having children studying can be super hard!
tommytimber wrote: » What are people covering for EU? I have Institutions, General Principles, Direct Effect & MS Liability, Judicial Review, FMOG so far.
DFMCD190384 wrote: » Contract Hi all, has anyone any predictions for Contract? Really stressing out over this one.
CoconutHeadMia wrote: » I was thinking; Offer & Acceptance Consideration Estoppel Privity Misrepresentation Terms Remedies Consumer Protection Illegal contracts Undue influence Discharge Is there anything I have left out?
bigchungus wrote: » Someone posted a google drive with all the past papers/sample answers a few pages back
