rickis tache wrote: » F#@k me but I am missing it.. Missing finding last week's banana still in the bag. .
benji79 wrote: » Some cover ups there. They said there was no clusters in schools. A cluster has to be more than one. But I’ve read elsewhere that there was 70 individual cases last week in schools
RGS wrote: » But numbers are not school related as per government and NPHET. Schools are safe. It's all the fault of household transmissions. Having listened to Leo earlier and nolan from NPHET yesterday, they appear to be laying the groundwork to cancel their potential easing in April.
benji79 wrote: » Cases high again today. With next half of schools to open Monday next two weeks will be critical. If it starts heading to the 800-1000 mark again per day we’ll be in trouble for every sport I think
ForeRight wrote: » In the Indo today. These are the leaks I like to see. [img][/img]https://media2.giphy.com/media/ToMjGpKniGqRNLGBrhu/giphy.gif?cid=82a1493biokvhhlmt4k06a519jvqkgf9kwq9zdt3yyssl9qi&rid=giphy.gif
Golfhead65 wrote: » Agree in theory but they can massage the figures to do as they want.. Eg 3 deaths in March.. 23 in Feb and 6 in Jan.. This is what we see every day. Where they get the figures from is beyond belief
almostover wrote: » The 'strategy' if you could label it as such is beyond useless. Golfers are being denied access to a safe sport and a whole myriad of other illogical restrictions have been foisted upon us. My biggest issue is that any 'living with covid strategy' should have revolved around transparent data based decision making. For example, have a review on the 1st Monday of every month. If the incidence rate is <w, death rate <x, hospital capacity >y and ICU capacity >z then we move to the restriction level that corresponds to those values. Simple, transparent, clear decision making. No pandering to lobby groups on one extreme and zero COVID proponents on the other extreme. Makes communication a cinch too. Instead what we have is nothing short of a communication shambles. 'Era sure we will see what the craic is in a few weeks like'. As if the decision being made are pertaining to where will we go for a pint on Saturday night, which in any case is now outlawed. Golf too would benefit from this clarity. At this present juncture golf club member are in the dark. We might be back in April, it could be June. No information on what drives those decisions at the highest level. This government must take serious responsibility for the waning of the resolve of the general population. There's no strategy for us to follow and human nature is dictating that in this vacuum devoid of any leadership that people are taking decisions into their own hands.
Monster249 wrote: » You've mad assumptions. My criticism of the leadership is based on the communication, lack of actual rationale and evidence for many claims and restrictions and the ultra-conservative approach they've taken. I don't think our reopening can (or should) be summarized into a 5 step plan, I also don't think a "ah sure we'll play it by ear, check back in 6 weeks" approach is good enough. If you want to disagree with me and say that their communication has been solid and leadership inspiring and strong, then have at it, it's your opinion.
bustercherry wrote: » But you just effectively stated you thoughts in binary terms, "strict restrictions" is "weak/bad leadership"?
Kid Charlemagne wrote: Well maybe they didn't close the borders and airports, and allowed the much more contagious UK strain to run rampant in the country?
bustercherry wrote: » I think we have established that and they didn't close down "just" golf.
ForeRight wrote: » I see this a lot. Can you explain to me how you close the north off from the republic. Legally and logistically.
Kid Charlemagne wrote: » Unnecessary travel preclusions - same as anywhere else in ireland. I cant drive over 5 km from my house. Checkpoints handle the logistics. Anyway my point was more broadly about the fact that we should be calling the govt out for their failings rather than turning on our fellow citizens and somehow justifying the draconian restrictions we have been subject to.
Monster249 wrote: » I can assure you I understand exactly what it means, I just don't think in binary terms and I don't think making blanket decisions for almost the next 3 months is good enough.
Kid Charlemagne wrote: » Well maybe they didn't scale up the hospital capacity when they had a chance? Well maybe they bowed to interest groups and opened all the boozers for a month in what is known to be peak flu season? Well maybe they closed down golf courses despite the fact that its a perfectly safe way for people to exercise? Well maybe they didn't close the borders and airports, and allowed the much more contagious UK strain to run rampant in the country? etc...
Kid Charlemagne wrote: » Well maybe they didn't close the borders and airports, and allowed the much more contagious UK strain to run rampant in the country? etc...
FixdePitchmark wrote: » Well maybe we are less compliant people. So the lockdown has to be different in Ireland.
bustercherry wrote: » This trope gets trotted out lots these days, especially when a decision is made people don't agree with. Most people don't even understand what it actually means.
Monster249 wrote: » Definitely the latter, Ireland is near the top in every list for strictest lockdown across the board. It's just another part of their weak leadership and resistance to any sort of nuanced thinking!
youcancallmeal wrote: » I wonder is that because of golf gate or just the Irish governments refusal to to do anything but blanket bans on everything. Maybe a bit of both
twounderpar wrote: » The headline on the piece says that Republic of Ireland have had the longest golf closure in the world.