MrMusician18 wrote: » A can shouldn't fill a pint glass.
MrMusician18 wrote: » I have often wondered why Guinness and other drinks companies don't do 565ml cans for the Irish and UK market. Must be no profit in it.
Hotblack Desiato wrote: » The floating widget 500mL can is already the same size as a 568mL non-widget can. A 568mL widget can wouldn't fit in a lot of people's fridges.
the beer revolu wrote: » It could be slightly wider.
Thundercats Ho wrote: » I love craft beer and i love Guinness too. Can't we all just get along...
L1011 wrote: » Plenty of people who know the marketing nonsense is nonsense still drink the product.
Thundercats Ho wrote: » These Guinness threads really bring out a certain type, and there's been a few in this thread alone. If you dislike either Guinness or 'that type' of Guinness drinker, do everyone a favour and don't contribute to the thread. If someone believes that a Guinness pour is alchemy, they're not going to have their opinion changed by someone on the internet, who's clearly trying to belittle them. Very rarely in any of the many craft beer threads, do you get a Guinness (or any macro) drinker interject, to pontificate to craft beer enthusiasts. However, every time, without fail when a Guinness thread is started, you see these know alls 'surge' in to share their pearls of wisdom, and try to enlighten the savages. I love craft beer and i love Guinness too. Can't we all just get along...
MrMusician18 wrote: » They are, especially in niteclubs and function rooms where the keg room may as well be in another county is so far away. These are the exception.
the beer revolu wrote: » On a discussion forum related to beer it's not unreasonable for beer enthusiasts to point out myths and inaccuracies about beer perpetrated as facts. You'd like a beer thread where no one can be challenged on their "facts"?
EagererBeaver wrote: » The thread had nothing to do with Guinness vs cans vs craft beer. It was about surger availability and options. A few of us got sorted, and happily so. If all you want to do is pontificate about absolute nonsense or feel some misplaced (very, very misplaced in some of your cases) smug sense of superiority because you're craft beer **** who love to laugh at the plebs drinking Guinness or you're professional flavourists or whatever, kindly piss off somewhere else.
Slashs hat wrote: » So how much would you pay for a surger unit. - I am not selling put just asking this group how much would be willing to spend on the tower unit with your own cash. Going stupid money these days in my view. Would ye pay €300
BigAl81 wrote: » K, the scientific research continues. This evening I added more water to the jewellery cleaner, so at least an inch deep. Before I had less than half that. It's a complete game changer, tonight's beers are twice as good I reckon. Bigger fuller creamier head that lasts the whole way down to the end. Very impressed this evening I have to say! I'm going to have another one now just to be sure
L1011 wrote: » I suspect that canning machines are generally designed to take varying heights not varying widths; or at least they would only be designed for the standard two widths (the "normal" one and the "Red Bull and now Coke" width). Looking at can blanks from the main suppliers and they all just vary in height. That a 520ml can surged fills a pint glass does give an indication of what liquid volume you're getting served as a pint in most cases.
Thundercats Ho wrote: » Have you tried using the surger with a standard widget can, like in the video below? I'd be interested to see your results?
BigAl81 wrote: » I'll be trying this at the weekend and am very (very!) interested to see how it goes. I'll report back. If that trick means we can use regular Guinness cans that would be deadly!! I'm also planning a blind taste test with regular Guinness v Surger Guinness. Watch this space! Another authentic Guinness experience this morning after a few Surger cans last night. I'm starting to see where the surge name came from I think
sharkman wrote: Tried it tonight by putting a tiny hole in the can , sucessfully got the Guinness out without the wigit activating . It worked perfectly in the surger unit but , but it diddnt taste the same ...
sharkman wrote: » Tried it tonight by putting a tiny hole in the can , sucessfully got the Guinness out without the wigit activating . It worked perfectly in the surger unit but , but it diddnt taste the same ...
listermint wrote: » Probably because it's possibly a load of bollix for folks who've justified in their minds buying a machine and spending twice the money on a can for it. I'm waiting on a serious blind taste test ok a surger unit , normal can and a draught. We will see them what's actually bollix. My money's on the surger being shown up as no different solely because I hate to see people robbed of hard earned money.
Lynk wrote: » there's a definite quality jump with the surger cans.
BigAl81 wrote: » Would you try a blind taste test