LFCFan wrote: » Whatever direction they are going the only thing I really want to see is Deadpool in a Guardians of the Galaxy movie. :eek::D
Cotts72 wrote: » Read an article over the weekend about marvel apparently replacing Stan Lee's movie cameos with deadpool going forward
PhiloCypher wrote: » That would be amazing
"I don't want anyone to feel like a prank was pulled on them. I don't want anyone to feel tricked and of course, you don't want people disappointed in things," she said, addressing those fans who were invested in the idea of the cameo potentially turning into an X-Men connection. "I would redirect to what the show is really about, and what is meaningful about the show, and what does resonate." Schaeffer said the cameo was a way for the audience to get inside Wanda's headspace. She explained: "It was really about what's happening in Wanda's head and the idea that someone could show up and not look like her brother and that she would accept it. What's going on with her in terms of her denial, and her self-doubt, and her disorientation that Agatha could trick her in this way? "We wanted to feel that very viscerally and it seemed like an incredible opportunity for the audience to feel it too with this meta-level of casting, with all of their associations to Evan in this other space. The idea of doing it with just any other actor, I'm like, 'That's not going to land.' That's not going to have the same thrill, and craziness, and questions, and be as disorienting." WandaVision director Matt Shakman also spoke to IGN about the team's decision to bring Evan Peters into the MCU as a "fake Pietro." He explained how the cameo thematically tied into the show's narrative — particularly Wanda's inability to cope with the overwhelming loss that she has encountered throughout her life, and her all-consuming grief. "Our whole show ultimately is about how we deal with trauma, how we come to terms with loss," he said. "And sometimes we trick ourselves, and sometimes we agree to see things that we know are not there, because it brings us some solace. She's willing to fall into the arms of Evan Peters, believing that it's Aaron Taylor-Johnson, because she needs it. And I think that my heart goes out to her for that."
Penn wrote: » Some comments from the showrunner and director regarding Evan Peters as Pietro:https://www.ign.com/articles/wandavision-writer-quicksilver-cameo-not-a-prank-mcu-xmen
The Phantom Pain wrote: » While I get where she's coming from...you can't do something like this in a cinematic universe that is known for following reveals through and, most of all, that we know is introducing the-multi verse very soon in both Doctor Strange and SPider-Man which, by the way, is directly linked to Wandavision. I think they're definitely going to fix this down the line like they did the Mandarin.
FunLover18 wrote: » Leaving aside the fact that they can and they did, why can't they?
Foxtrol wrote: » Agreed, they can easily introduce the multiverse without Fox's X-universe being one of them. To me it actually makes way more sense for the viewers to kill the Fox universe than leave it hand out there, as there are huge issues with having multiple actors being the same characters - we see that already with Pietro. There is no explanation I can think of for that - especially when X-men Pietro came from a different time period as well. The route of least resistance for MCU is it is their characters but different - like Wanda's kids being alive in another multiverse or the whole premise of the 'What if' series that is coming out in the summer - each of those being a different multiverse. They might shoe horn something different for Spiderman but I feel many are going to be extremely upset about how that plays out - too many hopes have been built up from a few rumours.
The Phantom Pain wrote: » What I maybe should have added was they can't introduce Fietro knowing full well that we know about the upcoming multi verse which involves Wanda herself and then be surprised at some of the backlash to the fakeout. All the other theories that weren't followed up on can be forgiven because a few easter eggs in an episode does not mean anything but they played on our knowledge of Fox's (terrible) X Men universe to drive hype for that reveal. They knew exactly what they were doing. That is my one criticism of the show. That and the last 2 episodes being too short. Everything else was brilliant and it is the best show I've enjoyed in years.
pixelburp wrote: » Jesus, after 3 episodes of gimmickry, episode 4 felt like full on tonal whiplash; probably not helped by it coming across like a generic MCU production, drab colour grading n all. I mean, the premise revealed itself but even so, you look at Legion, which managed to keep a similar vibe in both the real world and David's. There was a madness across the board. I dunno. I'm just not buying into this. and Not just with this show but the MCU as a whole right. now. I never cared for Wanda, Vision or anyone in SWORD so was not a good starting point for me. I had suspected my appetite for the MCU had hit a natural end around EndGame, especially as I looked at the replacement Avengers; and yeah, Wandavision is confirming this suspicion.
FunLover18 wrote: » But if you think Fox's X-Men universe is terrible why would you even want it crossing over with the MCU. Personally I was relieved because I feel the same about the X-Men universe, it would a mess because to acknowledge it as a universe you'd have to acknowledge the mess of a continuity.
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » Have to agree on the colour in MCU productions. They all seem to have this sheen of grey on top which is not needed and they'd all look much better with sharper colour tone. I'm perplexed why they persist with it. There is a youtube vid somewhere that deals with this and compares Marvel movies with current tone alongside sharper tone clips of the same movies and it looks so much better.
The Phantom Pain wrote: » 1) Because it's a multi-verse so by definition it does not directly break the canon of Disney's MCU. 2) It's just Quicksilver who is relevant to Wanda's story (along with Magneto). As long as it didn't go beyond that it was fine. The point is that regardless of how I or anyone feels about Fox's X Men, Marvel knew exactly what they were doing so they should not be surprised that people interpreted that cameo as being something more.
FunLover18 wrote: » Again though this narrative that Marvel knew what they were doing, it paints a picture of Marvel as some Mr Burns type character twiggling his fingers and saying "excellent" as he watches people get upset by this (EDIT: I should say this is what I picture when people say something like that). As you said, it was you and others who interpreted it as something more and it seems like you interpreted it as done-deal mulitverse shenanigans which was never promised. I know you said you enjoyed the show overall though, do you think on rewatch your frustrations with it might ease?
Foxtrol wrote: » I still can't wrap my head about why people feel they are justified to 'backlash' at this. TV and movies would be incredibly boring if there weren't curveballs, bait and switches, red herrings, and whatever other phrase you want to use to describe the audience being tricked. I disagreed with the response to the Mandarin but at least understood some elements of it - as it potentially deprived them of ever seeing that character properly on the screen. In this situation, we saw two versions of Quicksilver over the last few years, across 3 movies. Add to that, many of these same fans who are 'backlashing' agree that the Fox universe should be put to bed and Quicksilver is too powerful of a character for many stories. We all have theories that end up being wrong or times we believe it would have been better if writers had gone our preferred direction. There is huge difference between noting this dissatisfaction and clear anger and entitlement from certain fans regarding not getting their way.
The Phantom Pain wrote: » I don't think that's what anyone is implying at all. Simply that Marvel knew how their audience would receive it knowing full well a multi-verse is coming that involves Wanda and used that so they could draw interest to the story they actually wanted to tell which is one of grief. I'm not "frustrated" with it; it's just that I'm able to see where people are coming from and I do regard the Fietro as a mistake. It doesn't ruin my overall love of the show or the MCU. Enjoying a show does not mean pretending it's perfect. Marvel is capable of making mistakes, as rare as it is.
CosmicFool wrote: » God everyone is so negative. The Irish are so negative. It was a fantastic show. It's all fictional and based on comics. Come off it guys. Jeez.
Insect Overlord wrote: » What's nationality got to do with anything? All the posters here who love the show are Irish too.
