nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

The wondrous adventures of Sinn Fein (part 3) Mod Notes and Threadbanned List in OP

Sephiroth_dude

Part 1 here
Part 2 here

All mod warnings from part 1 remain in effect

All thread bans from previous threads remain in effect

I have updated the OP of this thread with a list of threadbanned users, I would advise posters to check on this before posting in the thread again or a forum sanction will be imposed for breaching same.

If you want to discuss your threadban feel free to PM the banning mod (or myself if you can't remember who that is and I'll point you in the right direction).

The topic is SF, not other political parties or politicians from other parties

Final warning - permanent threadbans for any posters trying to make it a discussion of other parties (where there are already active threads running for most of them)

Threadbanned Users
Shefwedfan
Redgirl82
Hamsterchops
dundalkfc10
Mortelaro
Randy Archer
maccored
mynamejeff
RandomViewer
Hqrry113
McMurphy
Doesitmatter21
Natterjack from Kerry
Ha Long Bay Lifted 5/5/21
snoopsheep
Marco23d
CaoimhinCong
costacorta
mikethecop Lifted 10/01/22
FrancieBrady lifted 19/02/22
Yurt!
votecounts
FrancieBrady
Brucie Bonus
Badly Fukt
jm08

Carry on...

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

FrancieBrady

wicklowstevo wrote: »

you can read minds now ? or are you just feeling persecuted

as for labour your just trying to deflect I can only suspect

your the only one mentioned those two party's

as for the other fella ? lol fooling no one but yerselfs a chara

I'm trying to 'deflect' by mentioning Labour?

Do you know the meaning of 'deflect'?

As I said, politicians are critical of RTE all the time. Seems to be a few of you very upset they were critical of something involving the royal family. Quaint and cute as that is, my concern would be RTE's priorities.

Plenty of opportunities (as already said by Bishop) all day to get your royal fix if you needed it.

wicklowstevo

FrancieBrady wrote: »

What are you saying?

You cam on to have a go at SF and Labour and others being critical of RTE's priorities.

Turned into having a dig at another poster mostly from what I can see.

you can read minds now ? or are you just feeling persecuted

as for labour your just trying to deflect I can only suspect

your the only one mentioned those two party's

as for the other fella ? lol fooling no one but yerselfs a chara

wicklowstevo

FrancieBrady wrote: »

Are you for real here?

any answer to the question ?

about your love of the invaders sport ? lol

FrancieBrady

blanch152 wrote: »

You don't see the irony of criticising a focus on the British Royal Family in order to focus on the British National Sport?

I haven't stopped laughing.

Are you for real here?

blanch152

FrancieBrady wrote: »

Was it you that was going on about DeValera?

Where did you get that attitude? Straight out of his playbook on these things and the old GAA. They lifted the 'Ban', you do know that yeh?

You don't see the irony of criticising a focus on the British Royal Family in order to focus on the British National Sport?

I haven't stopped laughing.

FrancieBrady

blanch152 wrote: »

LOI - League of Ireland?

The sport invented by the British and their national game?

You want more attention to that and less attention to the British Royal Family?

It is a bit like arguing whether the Daily Sport or Hello Magazine are more Irish.

Was it you that was going on about DeValera?

Where did you get that attitude? Straight out of his playbook on these things and the old GAA. They lifted the 'Ban', you do know that yeh?

Natterjack from Kerry

FrancieBrady wrote: »

Politicians criticise RTE and ask questions all the time.

Funny to see some get upset because this time it was about the royals.

And yes, as a republican, I detest the idea of royalty...anywhere it still clings on.

Look, while they may no longer be so, the royal family are the descendants of our former heads of state, and as such deserve some respect and our expression of good will, even if we have gone our separate ways for the moment. 'Detesting' the idea of those who were our kings - and their history and heritage is ours too to a great degree - is rather too strong in my opinion.

blanch152

FrancieBrady wrote: »

LOI - League of Ireland?

The sport invented by the British and their national game?

You want more attention to that and less attention to the British Royal Family?

It is a bit like arguing whether the Daily Sport or Hello Magazine are more Irish.

FrancieBrady

blanch152 wrote: »

This is funny.

Poster complains about Irish public interest in the British Royal Family because it takes away from the national TV station giving full attention to the British national sport.

You couldn't make it up.

FrancieBrady

wicklowstevo wrote: »

you don't want me to respond to this slur ? why now ?

hardly a poster just a liker

Am I saying something that isn't true and accurate ?

What are you saying?

You cam on to have a go at SF and Labour and others being critical of RTE's priorities.

Turned into having a dig at another poster mostly from what I can see.

blanch152

FrancieBrady wrote: »

No anger here, just critical of RTE. I have a big interest in a cultural area RTE largely ignores.
My son is also very involved in the LOI, so all very relevant in this house

This is funny.

Poster complains about Irish public interest in the British Royal Family because it takes away from the national TV station giving full attention to the British national sport.

You couldn't make it up.

wicklowstevo

FrancieBrady wrote: »

Of course you do.

You are here to protect the royals from criticism. What else are you doing here otherwise?

you don't want me to respond to this slur ? why now ?

hardly a poster just a liker

Am I saying something that isn't true and accurate ?

FrancieBrady

wicklowstevo wrote: »

the truth hurts as always , on this topic as much as others

report function is to the left francie if you feel hard done by ,

any sign of davycc ?

What truth? That you have feck all to say and want to have a pop at anther poster while replying to me?

wicklowstevo

FrancieBrady wrote: »

You are the only one doing it here.

the truth hurts as always , on this topic as much as others

report function is to the left francie if you feel hard done by ,

any sign of davycc ?

FrancieBrady

wicklowstevo wrote: »

it would be in keeping with the general theme of the party

You are the only one doing it here.

wicklowstevo

FrancieBrady wrote: »

Maybe I should have a snide pop at another poster? Would that be up to your standards?

it would be in keeping with the general theme of the party

FrancieBrady

wicklowstevo wrote: »

LOI ? best you can do ?
are you having a off day ? that's a very weak response ,

Maybe I should have a snide pop at another poster? Would that be up to your standards?

wicklowstevo

FrancieBrady wrote: »

No anger here, just critical of RTE. I have a big interest in a cultural area RTE largely ignores.
My son is also very involved in the LOI, so all very relevant in this house

LOI ? best you can do ?
are you having a off day ? that's a very weak response ,

FrancieBrady

wicklowstevo wrote: »

is daycc ok , ?

he hasn't liked your posts yet , do you need to check on him ?

such anger over something that has what effect on you ?

No anger here, just critical of RTE. I have a big interest in a cultural area RTE largely ignores.
My son is also very involved in the LOI, so all very relevant in this house

wicklowstevo

FrancieBrady wrote: »

Politicians criticise RTE and ask questions all the time.

Funny to see some get upset because this time it was about the royals.

And yes, as a republican, I detest the idea of royalty...anywhere it still clings on.

is daycc ok , ?

he hasn't liked your posts yet , do you need to check on him ?

such anger over something that has what effect on you ?

FrancieBrady

wicklowstevo wrote: »

long as ye dont go back to blowing them up along with local young lads

the sad petty hatred is so transparent even with something as inconsequence a this

progress ? what progress

Politicians criticise RTE and ask questions all the time.

Funny to see some get upset because this time it was about the royals.

And yes, as a republican, I detest the idea of royalty...anywhere it still clings on.

wicklowstevo

FrancieBrady wrote: »

The royals...great bunch as regards the bolded stuff.

I will laugh at them if that's alright with you? And criticise those who 'have no interest' in them.

long as ye dont go back to blowing them up along with local young lads

the sad petty hatred is so transparent even with something as inconsequence a this

progress ? what progress

FrancieBrady

wicklowstevo wrote: »

see above for me being here ,

bullies and terrorists

as for Canadians and Germans I couldn't give a toss as it effects me or likely you in no way, not everything is to do with the party you know

The royals...great bunch as regards the bolded stuff.

I will laugh at them if that's alright with you? And criticise those who 'have no interest' in them.

Bishop of hope

I have no interest in it, didn't watch it or read about it, the royal interview that is, but yet its all I'm hearing about all day.
In my face in the papers, talked about on 2 progs on our local radio station today.
It's the topic of conversation across Ireland today and my Mrs is even in my ear about it.
Fcukin stupid rte, showing that and trying to sell a bit of advertising around it.

wicklowstevo

FrancieBrady wrote: »

Of course you do.

You are here to protect the royals from criticism. What else are you doing here otherwise?

see above for me being here ,

bullies and terrorists

as for Canadians and Germans I couldn't give a toss as it effects me or likely you in no way, not everything is to do with the party you know

wicklowstevo

FrancieBrady wrote: »

The people who watched? Yeh, strange fascination, whether you are royalist or if you are watching for car crash value.
Have no interest in it, tbh.

I have no interest in it either as it is almost completely irrelevant but I do enjoy the way it makes you people react

by you people I mean the 4 or 5 constant posters here who always and only post party propaganda and the few banned posters who just like what ye post

hi davy

wicklowstevo

James Brown wrote: »

Vital that you took the time to come in and post about it. Thanks?

considering the amount of time you spend posting on what you consider divisive issues it would seem like more your problem than mine james

I just don't like bullies and terrorists hence posting on a sf thread

James Brown

wicklowstevo wrote: »

gas to see the usual party shills getting panties in a twist over some Germans and a Canadian without even knowing why

Vital that you took the time to come in and post about it. Thanks?

FrancieBrady

wicklowstevo wrote: »

gas to see the usual party shills getting panties in a twist over some Germans and a Canadian without even knowing why

The people who watched? Yeh, strange fascination, whether you are royalist or if you are watching for car crash value.
Have no interest in it, tbh.

wicklowstevo

gas to see the usual party shills getting panties in a twist over some Germans and a Canadian without even knowing why