GreeBo wrote: » Getting very difficult to figure out who are the edgelords and who are mocking the edgelords on this thread. Maybe something to think about?
breezy1985 wrote: » Pretty obvious to me
Evade wrote: I think Janeway will end up like a Burnham light, as in always being right no matter what
Evade wrote: » I'd prefer an antagonist do the wrong thing for the right reason future Janeway from Endgame with a hint of deranged flag officer that used to be a Star Trek mainstay.
AMKC wrote: » Do you think Humans will ever overcome Bigotry and if so when? Archer said in Enterprise Season 2 Episode 14 that humans had overcome Bigotry in the 2050s sometime but no exact date just about a century before that episode.
Evade wrote: » I'd imagine First Contact had a lot to do with it, nothing unites people like having another group to compete with. It's that old saying attributed to the Bedouin "I'm against my brother, I'm with my brother against my cousin, I'm with my brother and cousin against everyone else."
pixelburp wrote: » I'd generally agree with you (there's a first ), but ... in real life? These days? Maybe there's room for scepticism. I'm not even sure First Contact would rattle our cages enough anymore. For a start, you'd now have to reckon with a cohort of humanity that'd scream "FAKE NEWS" at a First Contact scenario;
pixelburp wrote: » While Star Trek's general allergy towards the subject of earth religions, ignores that other likely scenario that the event would cause a huge schism among religions across the globe. Possibly causing some serious regional conflicts to properly kick-off. There'd be a lot of very nervous generals, looking for any excuse to finally give their neighbours a good licking
Evade wrote: » I haven't seen it since the early 00s but Earth Final Conflict, also by Roddenberry, is all about a first contact Earth.
Evade wrote: » Maybe, maybe not. I've been on a bit of a Yes (Prime) Minister kick lately and I really don't think anything has really changed since then. I haven't seen it since the early 00s but Earth Final Conflict, also by Roddenberry, is all about a first contact Earth.
AMKC wrote: » So I thought came onto my head this evening. What if ODO had of been female? Would this have been better or worse. I think Quark would have had to be Female as well then or he could have been left as male but Kira would have to be male. It certainly would have made some of the dynamics on the show different. I know he could change anytime to any shape he chooses but if he had of been Female he could have used makeup to hide the imperfect face not that I have a problem with males using makeup either but maybe st the time it would not have went down well on TV.
breezy1985 wrote: » Why would Quark or Kira need to be male ?
AMKC wrote: » For the right dynamic to work and because of the time it was made.sure I suppose if it was done now they could be both male or both Female with no problem as long as the dynamic was still there.
pixelburp wrote: » I don't think the psychology has changed its more that the technology has allowed it to infest otherwise normal, sane humans to an industrial level now. The internet has allowed all knowledge to be accessible to everyone - but also every dark impulse previously limited by geography or physical printing.
pixelburp wrote: » I think so, eventually; much of the bigotry we deal with today are "only" holdovers from embedded historical contexts we simply accept as the status quo. Like, I think we sometimes forget first and foremost Star Trek is an American show with an American sense of self: it's easy to forget that in the US, there are (just about) still people alive who lived through the Jim Crow era, or the Tuskegee Syphilis Study (well, I don't know if there are survivors, given the subject). Heck the US police force has origins in slavery enforcement. Bigotry is still part of the social consciousness, and healing takes time.
Cookie_Monster wrote: » Interesting topic, if you watch Grey's or Station 19 at the moment it seems horrifically over the top in terms of anti black story and the moralising in it as someone outside of the US. but I guess for the US audience it might actually hit home and be accurate...
pixelburp wrote: » Keeping it related, Trek IMO has always been part of that public domain conversation too, even to this day, as much as some online seem to rage against this idea it was ever thus. Shítty writing is the true albatross of Trek these days, but this isn't caused by or formed from any sense of empowerment or continuing inclusivity. And again, we're only glomming onto American pop culture, it's not really for us (foreign box offices notwithstanding WRT the movies)
pixelburp wrote: » The original series was basically about America the Melting Pot, rather than anything completely global.
pixelburp wrote: » It was never any different IMO. And continues to be. "Foreign" people in the original runs amounted to Brits or Irish (or "French" by way of the RSC :rolleyes:) but American TV never really had much of an international perspective beyond 3rd world clichés or London / Paris (basically the only two EU locations according to US telly. Or rather, excuses for holidays for the producers and cast). The original series was basically about America the Melting Pot, rather than anything completely global. It's a shame, cos that helms officer on Discovery sounds to have an African accent so clearly they're aiming for more international flavour - just forgot to give her any kind of character (still can't remember her name)