Lawlz wrote: » Interesting suggestion! Thanks. Our biggest problem is that it seems to be flying under the radar because not everyone has been affected so they are getting away with it. Also the fact that the exams are so close, we don’t have time to appeal/ try to rectify it before the next sitting. ***For everyone on here that may see this and choose to ignore it because they weren’t affected in the last sitting: The same software is being used in March. That software is flawed and resulted in our scripts not being saved properly which resulted in fails, delays and no changes to grades were made despite this. ***
keelfe1s wrote: » Hi, Can somebody let me know what they’re covering for tort. Thanks a mil
ihatethesea wrote: » Can anyone advise on what Q.6 of Nov 2020 Company paper was looking for?"S.602 of the CA 2014 is a statutory example of the parri passu principle which requires all creditors of an insolvent company to be placed on an equal footing and not "leap frog" the statutory queue ordained by the CA 2014" I presume Corporate borrowing but what part specifically does anyone know?
FE1Pleb wrote: » Hey guys, Does anyone know if Graham Dwyer v Commissioner for an Gardas has come up as a case note question lately? Supreme Court judgement was handed down early last year
KingofTheFE1s wrote: » Worrying but don't think there is anything March candidates can do about it. If you want to sit FE1s in March you have to do so through this route.
lawgrad_ wrote: » Company Law Does anyone have company sample answers? Can swap for other materials. Thank you!
Al1501 wrote: » For Constitutional, thinking of leaving out trial in due course, the preamble, emergency and war, international law and ECHR, right to silence, right to jury trial, abortion, inviolability of the dwelling, freedom of assembly and association Article 45 and the case note. Is there anything else I can cut or is there something I should definitely include? Feeling very lost in this subject.
bluerthanu wrote: » Not that I have any special knowledge or anything but there’s a few on that list I wouldn’t be leaving out. In particular, trial in due course of law (its due a run of some sort). Right to silence/jury come within that then too. Freedom of assembly and association might be useful ones just to know in that they’re very short (and maybe topical, although everything in constitutional seems topical). I’m personally leaving out liberty and life etc and that stuff on sovereignty etc. It does seem that you need to know almost the entire course with constitutional unfortunately, but it seems much more vague in terms of content to me than, say, tort so maybe that’s a consolation. My approach is basically to try know the outline of most topics but prepare 6-9 topics very well based on my own predictions. Nightmare of a subject unfortunately though.
phildub wrote: » Is it safe to leave out constructive trusts in equity?
nmurphy1441 wrote: » March 2020 Company... Can anyone tell me what came up? Or even better, have the paper? Thanks!
Lawlz wrote: » I got the same. My result didn’t change. Just so people know what they’re dealing with: Exams some of us took in November weren’t saved correctly meaning our original grades were wrong. This was due to software errors, not candidates own errors. We were contacted by the LS only two weeks ago when recheck results were due to tell us this and were told our exams would be corrected again. We only got results YESTERDAY- less than 3 weeks (closer to 2 weeks for those sitting the first exam) until the next set of exams with NO apology or even decent explanation from the LS and grades stayed the same regardless of the massive delay, disadvantage and the fact that sections were missing. There is not point in appealing and it is basically a tough sh*t situation. That leaves a few of us at a massive disadvantage with under 3 weeks to try to prepare and sit the next exams. This delay was no fault of our own and is 100% on the LS side. The same flawed software will be used in March with no prior warning given to candidates.
bigchungus wrote: » Would anyone have the 2020 criminal examiner's reports? Can't find anywhere online
lsheehaneire wrote: » Thanks for your advice. Just in relation to Freedom of assembly and association it seems quite light on case law ( from my notes) would you have any you could recommend? Thanks !
awsah wrote: » Does anyone have any up to date equity exam papers/sample answers that they would be willing to send me/swap for other materials?
