nmurphy1441 wrote: » Anyone ordered from book depository recently? What are their lead times on delivery?
bigchungus wrote: » My FE1 grinds lecturer has told me not to worry about sentencing/fines for offences in criminal as it's not on the syllabus but I feel as though I should be sticking them in anyway? Any thoughts?
jip000 wrote: » Got an email today from the LS to say that even though my exam was missing parts and was regraded, my grade remains the same. For the one missing parts and the other one I had rechecked. No explanation. Im not sure what to think at this point. Well, thats not true- I’m thinking that I’d really like beer right about now
Fe123 wrote: » Does anyone have notes for distribution of assets on a winding up, head is fried
nmurphy1441 wrote: » JD Brian case.... is this an example of automatic crystallisation or express crystallisation???
Buttonbean123 wrote: » That’s very strange!! Do you know how much was missing from your script or are you able to view what was missing to see if you think it would be worth a few extra marks? I’m still waiting to hear back too. Emailed so many times to say that part of one of my questions was missing and finally got a response saying anyone who was missing part of their script was contacted! I had to send screenshots again saying I know for a fact that part of my answer is missing and now apparently better examinations are looking into it! Like we sat these exams 4 months ago ������
Al1501 wrote: » For Constitutional, thinking of leaving out trial in due course, the preamble, emergency and war, international law and ECHR, right to silence, right to jury trial, abortion, inviolability of the dwelling, freedom of assembly and association Article 45 and the case note. Is there anything else I can cut or is there something I should definitely include? Feeling very lost in this subject.
Byrne11 wrote: » Can anyone advise what sitting the online exam is like? I have a mounted webcam on my computer so its very limited to what I can show (I can lift my screen to show desk for initial checks etc). Does someone come on the screen and ask to go through your legislation if you have it for that exam, or how does it work? Thanks a mill & I hope everyones study is going ok!
Lawlz wrote: » I got the same. My result didn’t change. Just so people know what they’re dealing with: Exams some of us took in November weren’t saved correctly meaning our original grades were wrong. This was due to software errors, not candidates own errors. We were contacted by the LS only two weeks ago when recheck results were due to tell us this and were told our exams would be corrected again. We only got results YESTERDAY- less than 3 weeks (closer to 2 weeks for those sitting the first exam) until the next set of exams with NO apology or even decent explanation from the LS and grades stayed the same regardless of the massive delay, disadvantage and the fact that sections were missing. There is not point in appealing and it is basically a tough sh*t situation. That leaves a few of us at a massive disadvantage with under 3 weeks to try to prepare and sit the next exams. This delay was no fault of our own and is 100% on the LS side. The same flawed software will be used in March with no prior warning given to candidates.
Fe119 wrote: » I would consider writing to the Irish Times!
