mickdw wrote: » I dont agree. Its a strange one. Generally wet conditions are regarded as the great leveller and those who excel in the wet regard as tier one drivers. Lance comes to the fore in the wet yet gets slated. I think he is worth his f1 seat. If he gets blown away by vettel i will change that opinion.
OSI wrote: » Hulkenberg is treated like some deity and never managed a single podium, yet the much derided Stroll got a podium and pole in his debut season. Many thought the potential loss of Perez was some great travesty and waste of talent, but in the races they both finished in the last season they both finished ahead of the other 3 times. I’m sure he got a leg up because of his dad’s money, but he’s far from the least deserving driver on the grid.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » Good. As long as you were joking then it’s fine. You were hardly going to make the case that Stroll would have gotten into f1 on merit, let alone stayed there on merit of if wasn’t a special category of pay driver.
pjohnson wrote: » Ah yes. Hes no where near the quality of Alex Yoong, Delétraz Sr., Taki Inoue, and the American lad who got disqualified for literally being too slow and a danger to be on track :pac: I forgot meme beats reality for some.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » It was a joke, wasn’t it? Lance is the most extravagant pay driver of all time so far. Wouldn’t have gotten into the sport on merit and certainly wouldn’t have gotten a second season, let alone the rest.
OSI wrote: » How many podiums does Hulkenberg have again?
muckwarrior wrote: » LOL
pjohnson wrote: » Lance would have made it to F1 with his talents. He just took a shortcut due to his dad.
This is it wrote: » I'm hoping for a strong show from LeClerc and Sainz this year. A few podiums and 3rd in the constructors would be a huge leap. Would like to see Vettel and Mick Schumacher do well also. As much as I slated Vettel last season, with good reason in my opinion, he was a fantastic driver and I really hope he recovers his previous form. Seems like a genuine lad and you can't deny his talent.
Jordan 199 wrote: » Am I the only one who doesn't like the Williams livery?
pyramuid man wrote: » Don't forget to add Williams to that list. Without Laurence Stroll or Nicholas Latifis father, they would surely be gone a few years ago. I don't get the hate for Lance tbh. He isn't exactly the worst driver out there. It's not as of he was plucked out of 2 years in karting and his dad bought his seat in f1. He has a good history in the junior formulas and has had a few podiums. That doesn't happen because his father paid for his seat. He got a podium in a Williams for god sake.
recyclebin wrote: » Is there any actual photos of the car or has it even been built yet? The computer generated images they have released don't have the same engine cover bulge as the Mercedes or Aston Martin either. I'd be worried they are still way behind on development.
Romain Grosjean suffered an impact of 67G in his fiery crash at the Bahrain Grand Prix, the official report into the incident concludes.
Killinator wrote: » Personally I know a lot of people don't like the sons of money getting drives and 100% there are more talented drivers missing out as a result of 'daddy's money', buuuuut on the flip side if it wasn't for 'daddy's money's there could be at least 2 teams less on the grid, 4 drives gone. Force India and more recently Haas have been one punch away from a knockout blow to their F1 endeavors. If 'Daddy Stroll' doesn't buy into Force India, sure we don't have to watch Sir Lancelot buuut we most likely don't get to watch anyone else in his stead either as there is no team at all.