downcow wrote: » I don’t want to disappoint you but an ITV poll was released today which shows almost 60% of NI residents want to remain in UK. And that’s with brexit, Irish Sea border and carrots from Spain. You have a long way to go to convince all those from a catholic background before you even start on those from a prody background. I admire your optimism and determination lol
Natterjack from Kerry wrote: » Looking on the more positive news this week, good to see the British Isles pulling together in a bid for the world cup, showing how strong the pull of the original united Kingdom still is despite it all. An indication that we can still pull together when we want to.
BonnieSituation wrote: » Eh, 50%+1... it's not a long way from 43% not to mention that there's a hape of don't knows in there. But if you sleep easier tonight...
BonnieSituation wrote: » I suppose they could lay claim to cheesy peas. Though el Presidente might have something to say about that.
BonnieSituation wrote: » Eh, 50%+1...
FrancieBrady wrote: » All you need to do is look at where Scottish Independence was in the polls when their indy ref was called and where they ended up.
Natterjack from Kerry wrote: » Looked at realisitically, rather then from a point of self deception, it isnt 50%+1 though is it ?
BonnieSituation wrote: » What isn't?
lurleen lumpkin wrote: » Britannia Unchained etc
Natterjack from Kerry wrote: » The required movement from 43% that you refer to.
Savanta ComRes interviewed 1,008 Scottish adults aged 16 and above, 1,003 Welsh adults aged 16 and above, and 510 Northern Irish adults aged 18 and above. The interviews were carried out online from 18-22 February 2021. Savanta ComRes also interviewed 1,924 English adults aged 18 and over from 19-21 February 2021. Data has been weighted to be representative of English adults by age, gender, region and 2016 vote; Scottish adults by age, gender, region, 2014 and 2016 votes; Welsh adults by age, gender, region and 2016 vote; and Northern Irish adults by age, gender, region, religious community and 2016 vote.
FrancieBrady wrote: » That has to be one of the lowest numbers polled in a 'representative' poll I have ever seen. Not an expert on plls, but seems odd.
BonnieSituation wrote: » What isn't? Any thoughts on the loyalist paramilitary rejection of a peace agreement supported by the majority of the citizens in the north?
downcow wrote: » Yea it is remarkable, if NI is the terrible failure they say it is, that they can’t get anywhere near to even half the people thinking that a UI would be a better place to live.
Junkyard Tom wrote: » The DUP are utterly terrified of a border poll they're so confident in the outcome. They DUP (now aided and abetted by the UUP) have behaved abominably and will drive 'don't knows' to vote for a United Ireland and soft Unionists to Alliance where they'll gradually 'de-unionist' themselves. My goodness Republican dissidents must be in absolute convulsions of laughter at the mess the DUP/UUP have made of their 'union'.
Junkyard Tom wrote: » My goodness Republican dissidents must be in absolute convulsions of laughter at the mess the DUP/UUP have made of their 'union'.
Natterjack from Kerry wrote: » No, it isnt odd, and is statistically a usefully indicative sample size.
jm08 wrote: » The England one had under 2,000 (of 50 million people). The Claire Byrne Live straw polls has about that number out of 5 million people.
Natterjack from Kerry wrote: » It doesnt really work like that. Its the quality of the sample rather than the size in polling that matters, given that you are never going to get within even a tiny fraction of the actually referendum/election participation. Or looking at it another way, if you could select the perfect representative sample, 10 people would be enough for an accuracy of 10 percent, or 50 people for an accuracy of 2%. I cant comment on those doing this poll specifically, but it is very much a quality not quantity capability, and in principal, for something like that poll, as long as you are in the hundreds, its likely representative data.
BonnieSituation wrote: » The UUP had such an obvious route back to the top when Mick was in charge and they fupped it up. Now they're running around like the rump that they are. I was busy earlier with coláiste that I couldn't watch the ITV show itself, just stuck it on there. Will report back... EDIT: "It's a union that's lasted centuries..." good opening gambit there Julia.
BonnieSituation wrote: » The numbers are fine lads and I'm saying that from the POV of someone who is knee deep in Data Analytics. What isn't fine is how I am struggling to find the proportion of don't knows anywhere. My googling is failing me tonight. Classic British Stout. Anyone come across them?
downcow wrote: » I haven’t watched the show but their interpretation of the data will inevitably be skewed. The are making a tv programme and want to show that the UK is near breakup, otherwise their programme has no point to it. It would be good to see the raw data
downcow wrote: » We have grown very far apart.
downcow wrote: » So many of you guys are in denial about how your state is slow to throw off the shackles of the Catholic Church. It is surprising to me given the abuse saga and that so many church teachings seem so out of touch with your people.
downcow wrote: » Again I was met with the de angles at the beginning (and don’t tell me again that it’s not part of the news) I have taped the news a few times now and it always records the de angles). Then we had a significant news item updating us on the popes current visit. No mention of any of this on our news. And I am not knocking it - it just shows where interest lies.
downcow wrote: » Up here we would get similar if the queen was visiting Iraq
downcow wrote: » Seems like old red socks is still your head of state lol
downcow wrote: » So many of you guys are in denial about how your state is slow to throw off the shackles of the Catholic Church. Seems like old red socks is still your head of state lol