Rodney Bathgate wrote: » https://www.ejiltalk.org/shamima-begum-may-be-a-bangladeshi-citizen-after-all/ “Therefore, as of February 2019, Ms Begum is legally a Bangladeshi citizen. Consequently, the decision of the Home Office to deprive her of her British citizenship does not legally render her stateless. Hence, the measure is not unlawful insofar as the issue of statelessness is concerned. Although, it may very well be unlawful on other grounds, whether under British law or even international law.” Not as cut and dry as you are pretending lads. Anyway, we’ll see how it pans out.
Rodney Bathgate wrote: » End of the road is on your side of the discussion. It isn’t fair to mock him. Even if he does deserve it.
end of the road wrote: » this post makes no sense, the other poster was talking about erric. erric is a different poster to me. whatever you were trying to achieve, it has been an epic fail. ah well, better luck next time.
Deleted User wrote: » At least Eric Cartman had the good grace to know he was out of his depth and gracefully retreated from the discussion. He's sticking to 'thanking'.
end of the road wrote: » it is clear cut, as a british court/tribunal ruling that someone is a citizen of another country only carries weight in britain under british law. as bangladesh say she is not a citizen of theirs, then in the real world she is not a bangladeshi citizen, and any ruling by a british court is in international terms irrelevant because ultimately britain cannot tell bangladesh who is and isn't a citizen of their country.
Eric Cartman wrote: » im not out of anything, just little is being added to the pantomime of 2 posters screaming 'she's a brit, let her back into Britain, brit brit brit'
[Deleted User] wrote: » Will you ever piss off and start doing some f*cking reading.
Deleted User wrote: » UK Immigration Act 2014. She can only be made stateless
Rodney Bathgate wrote: » Very ‘clear cut’. If it is so clear cut why is she not back living in the UK?
Rodney Bathgate wrote: » Epic fail, like every single post of yours in this thread?
Gatling wrote: » She's currently not British , Can't open a current account ( might help to read what your quoting at people)
[Deleted User] wrote: » Am I still banned from posting in here, even though the person that reported me has been site banned for being clueless?
Deleted User wrote: » She’s only 21 and already buried 3 children. Beggars belief.
Hector Savage wrote: » Kids that would have been murdering British citizens in 15/20 years time ...
FTA69 wrote: » You keep repeating this like it’s some inalienable “gotcha”. Nobody is saying the Brits haven’t removed her citizenship and cancelled her passport. What they’re saying is that her nationality remains British, the country where she was born and raised, and that the Brits are pulling some sleight of hand b*llocks in order to dump their responsibilities in this regard. As for the other poster saying allowing her back would be a danger for the Kurds, the SDF themselves have explicitly said themselves that respective countries should take back their jihadis and process them.
Eric Cartman wrote: » Neither of her parents were british, her only link to britain was citizenship which has now been revoked, bangladesh can have her.
osarusan wrote: » No sympathy for her at all, but this argument: is a fairly sinister statement when you think about it.
She was on Good Morning Britain today, car crash live tv interview, complete basket case desperado now trying to get back to UK.
Doesn't come across as any different - just trying a different tack to get back in to the UK and changing her appearance to be more Western, nail varnish and all...
Her whole body language was screaming "I'm lying"
At 15 wasn't she legally a child? That is/was the only thing in her favor, but aside from that she hasn't a leg to stand on, I don't buy the new western look and attitude for a minute, also don't believe she didn't no what she was getting into by joining, one google search would reveal how bad ISIS are, also It wouldn't surprise me if she was in fact directly involved in ISIS activities...but what is her future? is she doomed to rot in a camp?
but what is her future? is she doomed to rot in a camp?
I don't think anyone really cares what happens to her - she may have been 15 but most people at 15 are not stupid (there isn't much maturity growth between 15 and 18), she knew full well where she was going and what she was going to but she didn't care fully shown by her comments about Manchester
Love the new look, smart idea to use the grooming excuse as well. Shameless but smart. Hopefully she's left where she is.
Her next step is to take her case to the European Court of Human Rights and she'll probably win because she is technically stateless, as she has never applied for Bangladeshi citizenship and the ECHR tend to enforce international laws.
Is it a prison camp or holiday camp she’s in?
"she's not been involved in terrorism but she could be an asset to intelligence services fighting terrorism"
Getting a little Mary Poppins now ,
Still believe any of the Europeans including the UK and here who went to Syria to join Isis should be been put to death , if the Kurdish forces don't want to, then send special forces to interview them in a desert and removed to buried in unmarked graves ,
And let anyone else that's thinking of joining a similar group in the future it's going to end one way for them
In an ideal world it would.
putting them to death would not be possible.
it's not up to special forces to risk their lives to kill these people.
drones are cheap and effective
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wa.vanillicon.com/v2/a605da6df673e065ac5a7e976411f425.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://we.vanillicon.com/v2/e406667f1106b31a9de61e5105cdb60f.svg)
