dulpit wrote: » Am I going mad or used Mark act as stand on host previously?
Ol' Donie wrote: » He did, and he was excellent at it.
Billy Ocean wrote: » is he Shane and Sharon Horgan's brother?
RedRochey wrote: » I've been listening for a couple of years and can only remember him host once for a boxing chat
den87 wrote: » It probably helped that I’d seen the documentary recently but I thought the Tiger Woods episode this week was one of the best in a while.
Raoul wrote: » I thought it was interesting. I always like the Scottish guy they have on. It was good to see him rubbish some parts of the doc. Also, I thought it was a bit crass to be talking about tiger making a come back to golf at the point of the podcast when he is lucky to be making a come back to walking. I think Ken and Rory thought the same too.
Still Ill wrote: » I think it's just because we expect him to be on every show. Wouldn't notice of Ken's not on a rugby or GAA show. Wouldn't really miss Murph if he's not on a football show either. Eoin's the main presenter, so it's immediately noticeable when he's not there.
deisedude wrote: » The Tiger documentary is compelling viewing but it is also ridiculously one-sided as he nor anyone close to him wanted to take part in it for obvious reasons
Beersmith wrote: » Lawrence donegan is always great (and i hate golf). Him, tim vickery and caitlin thompson should all be on more.
Beersmith wrote: » I don't think so, it just a joke that Murph can't let go of.
[Deleted User] wrote: » One thing about the Mrs. Murphy guide to the TV weekend that could improve it. If they picked out ONE highlight for each day Sat/Sun - which realistically is what a lot of people will only get to watch. At the moment it's Murph spewing out a list of fixtures/times/channels etc which I find very hard to digest at that speed. I think if they kept it like that but then at the end added their "picks of the weekend" it would be much better. As in, evaluate the importance/interest by sport and pick one single match to watch. Just my tuppence ha'penny worth. I await the standard "I think it's fine the way it is" post which will no doubt get a ton of thanks.
mcgucc22 wrote: » Getting rid of it entirely would be the best move to make.
bren2001 wrote: » Armen Keteyian wrote a fairly comprehensive book on Tiger in 2018. He conducted over 400 interviews of 250+ people and gives a fairly balanced view on Tiger. He was an executive producer for this documentary and the documentary if effectively just the book. I personally wouldn't consider that a one-sided account. Tiger and his people chose not to take part or refute the stories in the book. The feeling I got at the end of the book was that I pitied Tiger and everything he had to put up with. The events from 2009 onwards made a lot of sense to me after reading it. I got a similar vibe from the documentary. I know a lot of people (Golf Weekly for example) felt very different.