fe12021 wrote: » NB no question on injunctions.
WesternC123 wrote: » Constitutional Is everyone studying Freedom of Expression for Constitutional? For some reason when I was planning my topics I had left it out but I have no idea now if that was intentional or not. Also in terms of unenumerated rights, what are people concentrating on?
Byrne11 wrote: » Hey, they are out. Just type in city colleges night before notes 2021 and you sign up for them, you'll see it listed in your web search! Sign up and they e-mail them to you straight away with videos. Best of luck!
lawgrad49 wrote: » You couldn't send on the link to subscribe for the 2021 version? I have googled it a few times (Safari/Chrome) and keep getting the October 2020 notes/videos, which I already had access to. Is that what you are referring to? Or is there new notes & videos for this next March sitting? Thanks!
ellachapman96 wrote: » Does anyone know if the equity examiner has changed or is it the same person? The LS website says the same person but I thought I saw someone say examiner had changed. Thanks in advance ðŸ‘ðŸ¼
nicolesd wrote: » what topics exactly come under judicial review in constitutional they are not called judicial review in my manual? sorry prob such a stupid q!!!
Fe179user wrote: » Constitutional law: Separation of powers Judicial review President & AG Parliamentary privilege Freedom of expression Due process and due course of law The right of liberty Personal rights Property rights Constitutional interpretation Referenda Right to die Is this okay to learn for constitutional law or is there anything I could leave out or add in? For tort law: Negligence Trespass to land Rylands Trespass to person Nervous shock Defamation Duty of care Vicarious liability Contributory negligence Nuisance Also same for tort do I need to add anything in or leave anything out
FE1Hopefully1 wrote: » It changed in November but idk if it’s permanent
Law101 wrote: » Yep it’s Noel McGrath, thinks he’s the same if not worse than Oonagh lol
awsah wrote: » Imo you are leaving a lot out of tort, Rylands came up in November so you might be OK to leave that out. Did you consider passing off or employers liability? Vicarious was up in nov also (although that doesn't mean it won't show) also chapters like liability for fire/children/animals?
Fe179user wrote: » Would you recommend leaving out rylands and vicarious then and instead doing liability for fire/children/animals, passing off and employers liability instead? Thanks for this!
Iso_123 wrote: » How is everyone finding studying with working full time? I'm struggling to find the motivation to study for long after work
LawLearnin wrote: » My day is kind of flipped at the moment as I don't start work til around lunchtime (finishing at 9/10pm) and it means I can get a few hours done beforehand in the morning. Even when I was starting work at 9am though I found it better to get up at the absolute crack of dawn and study before work - I just cannot get my head down when the working day is done. Would getting some study in before your working day starts be at all feasible? I find it tough enough to juggle both some days and feel like I'm not covering enough per day, but think it's better to have productive short sessions when my head is able for it instead of half-arsed longer ones when I can't focus.
APower79 wrote: » I’m a mom of four who are all home at the moment. Trying to study early before they get up and after they go to bed. Not easy so I understand how you feel!
