pioneerpro wrote: » LMFAO. You honestly wouldn't see this sort of behaviour in the biggest social media crypto pump and dump groups. I've no idea why you're doing it here as opposed to Reddit or something. Talking about GAS fees in relation to ETH (fundamentally a smart-contract driven distributed App platform as opposed to a value store) while shilling LINK, without any reference to things like XLM or even LTC is...misleading. The most salient point you've made on your whole account, but advice you will never take yourself. In fact, feel free to show goodwill and show where LINK are partnered with SWIFT - and why they felt the need to take down the connection from their website (https://web.archive.org/web/20190820085402/https://chain.link/) Or better yet, their much vaunted partnership with Google Cloud?https://cloud.withgoogle.com/partners
dirk_dangler wrote: » Safe now to completely disregard any and all crypto advice from the 2 posters above. They have not got a clue what/who is in the photo , yet are here posting about crypto, very strange that. No one round these parts seems to have a clue what Arbitrum is and what it is going to do, yet post their crypto picks, very strange that. The entire market took its usual sunday night dump, but ROSE got a pump, strange that, could be to do with the announcement they might be making later today, if its what the rumours say, i would expect the new investors to pile in like mad men because of the name recognition . Now boards, get your thinking cap on and figure out what/who is in the photo, 100x could happen over night if either of the 2 huge world wide names rumoured to be partnering up with them announce it. A 1000x is possible and once you figure out what/who is in the picture and put it together you will understand why in these times its possible. I loading up my bags as we speak, when they are packed i'll let you know what it is, unless some big brain round these parts figures it out before i finish in that case i'll spill the the beans.
timeToLive wrote: » has to be a troll:D
dirk_dangler wrote: » Safe now to completely disregard any and all crypto advice from the 2 posters above. They have not got a clue what/who is in the photo , yet are here posting about crypto, very strange that.
dirk_dangler wrote: » Congratulation, you can use a reverse image search, I doubt you have a clue as to why this has a 100x potential. You have to be completely delusional to think boards could pump a coin. I won’t be posting about Link here again until it it $100, and yes it will be a told you so type of post So this is a low market cap thread, and with all your github commits for ERC20 projects you would be an expert, so what are you picks and why? Put up or shut up.
dirk_dangler wrote: » You have to be completely delusional to think boards could pump a coin.
dirk_dangler wrote: So this is a low market cap thread, and with all your github commits for ERC20 projects you would be an expert, so what are you picks and why? Put up or shut up.
Graham wrote: What's with the silly riddles?
pioneerpro wrote: » Oh I don't think its possible - literally why my first comment to you was that I've no idea why you're doing it here as opposed to Reddit or something if your motivation was profit. That's why I'm thinking what you're doing is far far more dangerous to the uninformed - pumping your ego to be recognised as some sort of domain expert. Yet any time someone pulls you up on your shenanigans and asks you to back up any of your claims, it's straight into ad hominem attacks and 'Oh, I'm taking my knowledge off the table, you're all going to be sorry' :rolleyes: That's the wonderful thing about open-source blockchain development; no one cares about being recognised as an 'expert' or thinking that somehow correlates to speculative alt-coin plays in a bubble Strong claims require strong evidence - especially when you're so incredibly condescending to anyone who tries to poll you on your thought processes or does basic due-diligence like asking for citations for your extravagant claims. You could certainly do with taking your own advice lol Large gaps in his knowledge, and/or parroting the opinions of some twitter pump'n'dumper without due diligence I'm guessing. Watch him disappear as he's increasingly pulled up on it. There's a reason he's after jumping into this thread from the other one with more veteran traders, just look at this page:https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=116182211
Graham wrote: » What's with the silly riddles? If you've got a tip you want to share, share it. If you don't, don't.
dirk_dangler wrote: » I wish all here well despite the attitude of some posters round these parts
dirk_dangler wrote: » every pick i have made i have given a reason, i would like to think i set out a good case to buy, if not i would like the criticism of others poster, correct me when you believe im wrong.
dirk_dangler wrote: » Wonderfull, thanks for sharing, could you tell us why?
grindle wrote: » Back on-topic. RIP anybody who didn't buy ZKS on Jan 12th when I first mentioned it. The only rando sh!tcoin I've held onto since release this year. Gonna hold until it destroys me. 30x in 30 days, what a minx.
Graham wrote: » I think I've seen most of your posts over the last few days. Did I miss the one containing a pick?
Ronan|Raven wrote: » Because a man on the internet told me and the name sounded kinda cool. Also, it has tfuel, and you use that to power the lambo to the moon? I think thats it anyway.
dirk_dangler wrote: » If I want to send you money from my bank account to yours , we both cannot see the contents of each others account, if I want to send you crypto we can both see the contents of the wallet one we know the address and every transaction, no one want this and most certainly a business would not want this. The really simple way of looking at it is ROSE can be used to send from from address to another, but not be able to see contents of each wallet.
dirk_dangler wrote: Facebook to launch their crypto soon, a stable coin that you can pay for stuff or send to each other, now you would not want your friends to see how much money in your Facebook account, so rumour is they use ROSE.
pioneerpro wrote: » And only 4 to 7 years after the launch of Monero, Dash and ZCash - to name 3 such coins with market caps over $500m that implement similar or better security and anonymity protocols and are already listed on the exchanges. Absolute horseradish btw. They'll almost certainly be using Diem as their global stablecoin, based off their existing Libra project. Absolutely 0 chance they'll use Rose, and no remotely credible source would even hint at it.
dirk_dangler wrote: » Riddle me this
dirk_dangler wrote: » We will find out soon if im correct
dirk_dangler wrote: » House hold name companies are not going to use any crypto that has connections with organised crime and money laundering. Libra was rebranded as Diem, its the same. Riddle me this , there was a big kerfuffle a month ago when Whatsapp announced new term and conditions to use, if you look at them one change is about buying and selling and transactions, you can already use Whatsapp to make purchases in India, mobile phone messing apps are used for payments in Asia, HUGE in CHINA, Whataspp look like they will be doing the same with Diem. I send you money to your bank account from mine, we cannot see how much is in each others account, if i send Crypto to your account we can both see how much is in each others account, no one would want that, Oasis Labs solved this problem, so go and do a little bit of reading on Oasis Labs ROSE and what its is capable of doing , Oasis Labs has a partnership with a Fortune 500 social media company currently under a NDA, that should get you thinking. We know Diem is to be released in the next month or two, if ROSE is part of it in any way, what do you think will happen to its price? Its hoovering around 10c at the moment, up from its iCO price of 8c, partners and investors are premium quality, next to no promotion, flying well under the radar, i think its going to be big, no need to hype it. We will find out soon if im correct
SteelyDanJalapeno wrote: » In on Vesper Finance, Modefi and Previse
seannash wrote: » Im in vesper but im fearful that the timing of it might make it a non runner. Its basically been on a constant decline since i bought it ��
pioneerpro wrote: » I'll riddle you nothing :rolleyes: You're clutching wildly at straws here to defend an indefensible proposition with very little knowledge or reference to any of the arguments against your position.Narrator: He won't be
dirk_dangler wrote: » Looks like someone will be eating humble pie soon, a double portion of bitter lemon flavour
