Cork Lass wrote: » And yet here you are :rolleyes:
Arduach wrote: » Even at the lowest levels that is wrong as you have people around the country following you and your plan. A leader represents by simple definition. That's part of the show from day 1.
joe40 wrote: » I didn't say she is a good leader. She's not at all engaging with the programme and therefore a very poor leader.My problem is that you and others however have brought race into it, by saying she isn't been criticized because she is black.
joe40 wrote: » I didn't say she is a good leader. She's not at all engaging with the programme and therefore a very poor leader. My problem is that you and others however have brought race into it, by saying she isn't been criticized because she is black.
Beechwoodspark wrote: » Have had a quick read through the most recent pages on this thread Jeez lot of negative comments re susanna, you’d wonder is there a touch of group think or bullying going on?She tried her best, and she was good tv, what more do people want ffs !
Beechwoodspark wrote: » Have had a quick read through the most recent pages on this thread Jeez lot of negative comments re susanna, you’d wonder is there a touch of group think or bullying going on? She tried her best, and she was good tv, what more do people want ffs !
Arduach wrote: » There's a leader on the show, Susanna, the majority of us think she's a nice person. We don't care whether she's green, black, brown, yellow. However. 3 out of 6 weeks she has gained weight. So she has gained weight as many weeks as she's lost weight. The 4 judges are very easy going with her and she receives far less criticism that Paul, a fella who has never missed a weight target. Are people no longer allowed to say 'I wonder why Suzanna isn't criticised?'. It's not racist to point out she comes from a minority, non national group of people in Ireland and the judges don't want to seem to be racist. Can the fact that she has received light touch judgement not be discussed??
joe40 wrote: » Of course that can be discussed. So what is your opinion? Is she not receiving criticism because she is black and the judges don't want to appear racist or not.
flazio wrote: » It's nearly over anyway, but I reckon Paul should be kicked off the show for this sort of endorsement.https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10159944953589879&id=116003279878 I mean, that's just going straight back to square 1. He won't sustain what he "learned" on this show.
Arduach wrote: » I don't know. It's possible they have given up on Suzanna, as they just can't get her to adhere to the plan. She's a lovely person, race means nothing to me, just trying to figure out what's going on with the judges. Maybe the dance approach is the way to go with her. I just think she hasn't any real drive in her to get healthy. For her age she's in bad nick.
Rodin wrote: » Lots of people go through a lot of things. That's no reason to end up with a BMI over 30. For all these reasons, I don't watch the show. My choice.
Beechwoodspark wrote: » Have had a quick read through the most recent pages on this thread Jeez lot of negative comments re susanna, you’d just wonder is there a touch of group think or bullying going on?She tried her best, and she was good tv, what more do people want ffs !
Housefree wrote: » Some Meds for mental health blow your weight up, seen it happen to a few people.
Rodin wrote: » Fat isn't created from oxygen alone. If you want to say some drugs alter the metabolism and fat storage then do so, but if that's happening, as always, eat less, move more.
Arduach wrote: » Maybe Karl made a mistake? Aoife was clear and certain. Looking at Andrew's body shape you see the huge change.
Naos wrote: » You think Aoife could tell that in the space of a week, 2 of the 4 pounds that Andrew lost was muscle loss and she could tell this by eye? If they had used DEXAs then they would be sure to mention it.
Arduach wrote: » Anyone who has suffered from depression knows that's BS. I'm a sufferer and I always find those who never had it just don't understand. I was a complete physical and mental wreck. I was exhausted walking 50m, totally collapsed. From an athlete to that. I lost weight initially as I was vomiting the small bit I ate. Even chewing was hardship. Then as I improved a little meds bloated me. When you're curled up in a ball there's little you can do. These illnesses are very real. It took me 5 years to get back to where I was, through sheer determination. Your world is too black and white. Yes a lot are lazy. But a lot are the most diligent and hardworking you'll find. Sometimes it's the later qualities made them sick. I was a pro in my sport and burnt myself out and caused the breakdown.
joe40 wrote: » Yes absolutely, easy to be judgemental. No one wants to be fat. I'm about a stone overweight. I have no problem at all doing exercise, and would be reasonably fit, but the discipline to eat the correct food consistently is more difficult. To paraphrase the Mark Twain smoking quote. Losing weight is easy I've did it plenty of times. The initial weight loss is the reasonable easy, keeping it off is difficult.
Arduach wrote: » 100% agree. The preponderance of foods with sugar compared to our grandparents/great grandparents time, 60-100 years ago, make it very hard to avoid temptation I feel! Also fatty foods. 70 years ago it was meat (poultry, bacon, beef, fish), vegetables and little fruit. You'll rarely see a an Irish photo pre 1950 with anyone over weight.
Princess Calla wrote: » The abundance of food wasn't there. People didn't have cupboards full of food. For alot they couldn't afford cupboards of food. Also majority of work was manual. No cars so people walked or cycled to work alot more. The lifestyle was totally different so not comparing like with like.