tikkahunter wrote: » Listen you know how to request it just like me , i was told next week on Sunday if you can get it any quicker your welcome to do so , but I suspect with a lot working from home that is why i havnt got it . SD refused the pay rise but didnt splash it all over social media. Their names will be on it.
atticu wrote: » Remind me how much compensation Maria Bailey received.
tikkahunter wrote: » I have put up various posts highlighting what actually goes on with SF and their TD'S and councilors after i was asked for proof, they have been reported and removed in minutes .Growing up around it i seen first hand what goes on and lads dont like that. Lot of accounts with low post count numbers popping up in here lately.
McMurphy wrote: » A question you should put to Alan Farrell and Maria Bailey.
McMurphy wrote: » No tikka - it's over a week ago since you said it would be "available next week", I don't know about you, but when someone tells me "next week" I take that to mean some day in the next calender week. Anything else isn't the next week. I honestly have no idea what you're on about having stuff removed, why do you think Someone would remove a list you obtained (assumedly via FOI), or why would anyone report same requesting it be removed? You made a claim you couldn't back up, and relied on data you didn't have. Btw if I tell the young lad working with me that customer A expects something in his yard "tomorrow" I mean the next day not two Tuesdays later.
tikkahunter wrote: » You can ask for it too ,its not under lock and key
tikkahunter wrote: » I put the request in and was told I’d have it this week like I said but I suspect as soon as I put it up you or one of your mates will report it and have it removed as you have done with all the stuff I have put up in the thread . .
Whatisthisnow wrote: » So your now saying, if you get the list and let us see it, someone will contact a mod who will remove it Its a bit early for the weed
Deleted User wrote: » If this list,isnt released,will yous call upon the government to resign for not releasing it?
tikkahunter wrote: » This is the next week so hasn’t come and gone , I put the request in and was told I’d have it this week like I said but I suspect as soon as I put it up you or one of your mates will report it and have it removed as you have done with all the stuff I have put up in the thread . The only spoofing going on is you pretending you are only lending your vote to SF , your a full blown lackey and will defend rape and murder at all costs .
tikkahunter wrote: » List is available next week as was stated , you his puppet ?
McMurphy wrote: » I get the feeling we were being spoofed to. "Next week" came and gone, and we're now into the week after "next week" but I've not seen this list yet. Would make you wonder alright.
Whatisthisnow wrote: » The magic list
McMurphy wrote: » Haven't seen this list yet tikka. Any chance you could point me in the right direction?
markodaly wrote: » But we aren't discussing SF policy on DP, we are discussing SF's long long history of protecting sexual abusers, predators and pedophiles. SF supporters, instead of defending that particular point ( they cannot because well they just cant!! ), will try and play the what about bingo game.
blanch152 wrote: » End of the day issues? What are you talking about? Let's keep talking about Sinn Fein on this thread, and ignore the whataboutery.
blanch152 wrote: » https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/sinn-feins-claim-uk-government-planning-to-suppress-voters-rights-branded-fake-news-40105145.html Getting back on topic, it looks like Sinn Fein have once again taken a leaf from the Trumpian playbook, claiming in advance of elections that the vote will be rigged. Will we see slogans such as "Stop the Steal" from them soon?
Yurt! wrote: » Blanch. It's pony talk and you know it. You love having a whinge about goalpost shifting and now you're on about whiplash. Go to bed. Maybe you'll make sense tomorrow. Don't eat any dairy products or you might have scary dreams about Pearse Doherty kidnapping your pet goldfish or something.
blanch152 wrote: » Yay, attack the poster, when the argument runs out. We already have a judicial commission looking at why compensation for whiplash in Ireland is running at ten times the rate elsewhere. Ditto for everything else, including cervical screening and the mother and baby homes. Ireland is a lawyer's paradise for compensation claims.
Yurt! wrote: » Utter pony talk. In any developed country such a circumstance would end up in court and financial recompense would be on the cards. You're having a shocker tonight across multiple threads even by your low standards.
blanch152 wrote: » Other countries don't have this culture of millions and millions of compensation for wrongdoing. It just doesn't happen. Why are the Irish so set on this?
Deleted User wrote: » no.....but they have been pure and utter wronged.....its immor for a country to spend millions defending corporations right to not pay tax And to then drag,its feet on paying conpemsation to those,they wronged. We have badly lost our way under ffg,any other government wouldnt carry on like this
blanch152 wrote: » Do you really think that compensation changes anything?
Deleted User wrote: » Mate,they been pure and utter wronged.....no reason other than political abdication of duty,to not pay them Why havnt the government begun the process of this and at what stage,would you call upon them to resign for delays??
Deleted User wrote: » Compensate them too,any that being abused,,they been pure wronged
Deleted User wrote: » Why can they not vote it in tomorrow??or at a minimum set it in motiom Looks to me,they are leading yous up the gardem path and have no intention of ever dojng so Reasses how?? Those women have been pure wronged by the state,pay em to fcuk,we have millions to spend for apple court cases in europe....but people been pure and utter wronged and due conpensation....nah we just reasses the whole thing
Deleted User wrote: » i mean like,the woman,adams niece,i think your refering to has gotten justice? Looks to me,your extrapolating data from a set of one,to claim something that simply deosnt exist Perhaps to further yous case,you can highlight which internal rule/policy enables what your claiming. ?? ...otherwise.looks to me,your pettifrogging to enable conversations on the rampant racism (also in shinners on this issue)in the free state policy on direct privisoon to be shut down....... .like your free to claim so,personally i have no issue,with death penalry for any/all politians whom particilated in any cover up of sexual abuse,whether it shinners here or ffg in mothrr and baby homes
Deleted User wrote: » Why dont the government go in tomorrow and vote it through??....they are well able to vote down living wage bills and dont hide behind pandemic to do so If they dont have it voted through by easter,will you call upon them to resign or will you just wait in perpetuately with some excuse or another to not vote it through??
markodaly wrote: » Again, what hypocrisy? I already addressed this. Apparently, SF had to protect sexual abusers, predators and known paedophiles because peace depended on it. Now if you believe that fairy tale, you will believe anything, so that is why we go down the Whatabout bingo.