blanch152 wrote: » Most recently it was member of Derry SF trolling the woman on social media, but it is all there on her social media feeds, you can look at it if you want.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Cahill asked for the IRA to deal with it, because SHE didn't trust the police and wouldn't go to them.
Deleted User wrote: » i dont think a character reference is a resigning offence they are ultimately pointless But it is a valid thing to point out,i was unaware of it.....i think i might do some more looking into this
Natterjack from Kerry wrote: » Did she tell you this personally, or is it in the public domain ?
blanch152 wrote: » This is the Sinn Fein thread. Leo isn't relevant, but Mairia Cahill is still getting dog's abuse on social media from Sinn Fein members, that makes her relevant. An inconvenient truth that won't go away.
blanch152 wrote: » That version of the story does not accord with the victim's. So far the only independent reports on the issue back her up. But of course, I keep forgetting. According to Sinn Fein, Mairia wasn't the victim, the real victims were those in Sinn Fein who offered to help her by having her abusers shot which she turned down because nobody deserves that. Or was it those who arranged the kangaroo court?
blanch152 wrote: » Yes, let's talk about Gerry Adams on the SF thread, and leave the M&B homes to their thread, agreed?
FrancieBrady wrote: » Can you back this up?
James Brown wrote: » Was using Varadkar as an example. This happens when he's raised in a FF/FG/Green thread or a FG thread, when he's in the news ffs. So the mother and baby homes equals Gerry Adams equals Maria Cahill...isn't going off topic because it falls under the shinner umbrella? Nah. It's also a current affairs forum not a FF/FG can't defend current policy forum or a FF/FG'er can't defend the indefensible let's use Maria Cahill forum. Maybe discuss O'Brion calling out the latest housing scam as driving up pricing or the other shinner raised with MM that he has yet to act on the reconciliation payments issue the state signed up to?
FrancieBrady wrote: » And off you go making up stuff again.
Natterjack from Kerry wrote: » .
blanch152 wrote: » Think her Facebook page is open, so google is your friend.
James Brown wrote: » So Twitter and Facebook are roll eye worthy cesspits unless there's something you can use? Fair enough... End of the day issues get raised and you roll out Maria Cahill rather than discuss the issues raised. I'm sure she appreciates it.
James Brown wrote: » He abuses her online by using her when he runs out of road. To him, all she is is a victim to be used. I don't think he's a shinner though.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Absolutely. It's a feature of the arguments here. When all else fails, exploit a victim. There is a list.
blanch152 wrote: » Sinn Fein supporters don't like references to victims of SF/IRA, who is surprised?
Natterjack from Kerry wrote: » As I say, SF are only comfortable talking about others - anything that avoids talking about themselves.
Deleted User wrote: » Except yous virtue signalling surronding this is shallow as fcuk in light of your continued support for government refusl to pay out mother and baby compemsation Its been weeks now and not a cent been paid out
Deleted User wrote: » they should have stronger policies on ending direct provision...they are as bad as ffg to not be pushing for its abolistion
markodaly wrote: » Whataboutery bingo is what we have going on here. Again, SF supporters just cannot defend the parties record on their own merit, hence the constant whataboutery bingo that goes on.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Why would hypocrisy be ignored? You guys defend the indefensible by the power swap. You have no high moral ground to stand on.
If you can find instances of FF or FG or any other party creating midnight Kangerro courts in dealing with an allegation of rape and sexual assault, and not telling the authorities, then maybe you have a point If you can find instances of other political parties moving sexual predators around the country, under the noses of the authorities, then maybe you may have a point. If you can find an instance of a leader of a political party, knowing in the full knowledge that someone is raping and abusing children, yet you do nothing about it, but in fact protect them, then maybe you have a point. Otherwise, you don't have a point. Sinn Fein are an outlier here.
Deleted User wrote: » i mean,the floor is open there for yous to discuss their policy on dirext provision Your claiming yous want to discuss them and their policies,i say it deosnt go far enough or in depth enough....what are your views on it and what areas do you feel it can improve on??
Deleted User wrote: » if wanting to discuss sf policy on direct privision and how it can be iimproved....
markodaly wrote: » Again, what hypocrisy? I already addressed this. Apparently, SF had to protect sexual abusers, predators and known paedophiles because peace depended on it. Now if you believe that fairy tale, you will believe anything, so that is why we go down the Whatabout bingo.
Deleted User wrote: » Why dont the government go in tomorrow and vote it through??....they are well able to vote down living wage bills and dont hide behind pandemic to do so If they dont have it voted through by easter,will you call upon them to resign or will you just wait in perpetuately with some excuse or another to not vote it through??
Deleted User wrote: » i mean like,the woman,adams niece,i think your refering to has gotten justice? Looks to me,your extrapolating data from a set of one,to claim something that simply deosnt exist Perhaps to further yous case,you can highlight which internal rule/policy enables what your claiming. ?? ...otherwise.looks to me,your pettifrogging to enable conversations on the rampant racism (also in shinners on this issue)in the free state policy on direct privisoon to be shut down....... .like your free to claim so,personally i have no issue,with death penalry for any/all politians whom particilated in any cover up of sexual abuse,whether it shinners here or ffg in mothrr and baby homes
Deleted User wrote: » Why can they not vote it in tomorrow??or at a minimum set it in motiom Looks to me,they are leading yous up the gardem path and have no intention of ever dojng so Reasses how?? Those women have been pure wronged by the state,pay em to fcuk,we have millions to spend for apple court cases in europe....but people been pure and utter wronged and due conpensation....nah we just reasses the whole thing
Deleted User wrote: » Compensate them too,any that being abused,,they been pure wronged
Deleted User wrote: » Mate,they been pure and utter wronged.....no reason other than political abdication of duty,to not pay them Why havnt the government begun the process of this and at what stage,would you call upon them to resign for delays??
