meeeeh wrote: » I think the main impression people got from this is that children and their needs don't matter. So yes there was a mistake that too much of an influence was given to unions when by far the biggest group affected by all this are children but they don't have a lobby group representing them .
mayo londoner wrote: » Strange how you are attacking the man but not disputing any of the points from the original post, says it all, head in the sand, hilarious!
dubrov wrote: » Cost is a huge factor. It's easy to have a good relationship when budgets increase massively. How many of those reforms you refer to didn't affect the budget?
Smacruairi wrote: » What influence? Teachers asked for unified remote platform for students, that was denied. Students wanted additional supports for those affected by covid, a panel of remote teachers made etc, that was denied. Teachers wanted a roadmap for the lc and jc from sept with various scenarios and contingency plans, that was denied, "schools are safe ". Teachers wanted more funding for those with additional needs, more teacher allocations to split classes, this was denied. So no, your ignorant rant is not valid, meeeeh. Please go back and educate yourself, otherwise we wouldn't be in this situation. Also students have their student voice in every school, have the ISSU which is party to all talks, and the parent's Council. You can ask Norma why she ignored these stakeholders in every step she has taken as minister.
jam17032010 wrote: » Address your points? I have adressed your poor grasp of statistics when you claim to have formed your "opinions" based on a handful of friends. I suspect your opinion comes from something else however. Which brings us to your bitterness, anger and the type of person you are. How you treat your gf and friends speaks volumes and is worthy of remark. Not worthy of remark on the thread topic of Norma Foley really, but on the direction you have steered it based on your own biases. You even predicted that your bitterness would be used as a retort against you. Perhaps because deep down, you know.....
meeeeh wrote: » You sound like Shinn Fein and their funds from general taxation. Where exactly will you get your extra teachers on you magic teacher growing tree? New classrooms on the magic classroom growing three? Besides school ran fine before Christmas, there were no major issues. Funding for additional needs is fine but what do you want it for? To make teaching from home easier? To send volunteers to schools so union members don't have to go? Student union and Parents Council are useful but not powerful enough, neither they represent everyone. Anyway i'm un-following this thread because unfortunately I'm not on mid therm break and a bit pressed for time.
mayo londoner wrote: » :the rest of the country is just fed up of the constant 'poor me' narrative from the the likes of you and other teachers and not afraid to call out the bull**** when it needs to be done.
LasersGoPewPew wrote: » Would you care to enlighten us as to how you would sort this mess? The unions are holding children's education to ransom. It doesn't matter who's in the minister's position, they will still get shat on by the laypeople for supposedly mishandling the situation or not doing enough to kiss the union's ass.
hamburgham wrote: » A 5 1/2 hour working day to say nothing of finishing even earlier if you’re teaching infants. 183 days a year, say 37 weeks. Gross up the 52k to a normal 48 working weeks and it’s 67.5k equivalent and that’s before any adjustment for the short working week. And yeah I’ve heard all about the prep. No one else has ever to do prep for their job only teachers.
jam17032010 wrote: » My to do list today: 1. Must do a google search for the dreams/reality meme from father Ted and attach it to this post. This mysterious "poor me narrative" is a figment of your imagination I suspect. 2. Must start thread on boards castigating an entire group of people based on 12 friends. I think I'll call it: "Health and Safety Officers - Is it a job requirement to have a superiority complex with a cranky disposition and enjoy telling others how to do their job better and in a safer way?" I think I need a catchier title though. Thank God I have great holidays to work on things like this. Speaking of which mayo londoner, you seem to have plenty of time on your hands to respond to this thread. Flicking between Safety Statements and boards.ie on your computer must be an art form. Just don't let the boss catch you! By the way, what's your high score on solitaire?
mayo londoner wrote: » :pac::pac::pac: Oh the irony of a teacher of all professions preaching about others and superiority, gas. The difference is other professions just get on with it rather than think the whole world is against them and don't attempt to hold the children and parents in this country to ransom. If you had read through my original post rather than deflecting from it, you would see that I'm now on the public sector gravy train like the rest of ye, hence the additional time on boards. Taking a break from the safety statements and the 45-50hr work weeks (which would most certainly be a figment of your imagination for the likes of you) for a year or two to see how it goes. I think the pay equality part of my first post covers the 'poor me' narrative of teachers perfectly. Anyways stick the feet up for the midterm, won't be long till your back doing your 30min zoom call per day, would take it out of any man. Adios Amigo, I've to get back to Solitaire
mayo londoner wrote: » So are you saying that just because she's my girlfriend, her and my friends are immune to criticism at times because they are teachers ya? Strange how you are attacking the man but not disputing any of the points from the original post, says it all, head in the sand, hilarious!
James Brown wrote: » Unions are member driven whose remit is to look after it's membership. They don't and shouldn't give two ****s about anything outside of looking after their membership. Unions are necessary.
lawrencesummers wrote: » Them wheelie bins won’t empty themselves.
political analyst wrote: » Why is Norma such a poor education minister even though she was a teacher until she became a TD recently? After all, teaching is a job that involves leadership, doesn't it? Isn't it important to for a minister to have empathy with front-line workers in that minister's portfolio?
hotmail.com wrote: » Poorer children getting hammered at the moment. The needs of children outweigh adult teachers.
alroley wrote: » 5 and a half hours??? I get to school at 7.50-8.00 and leave at 4.30 (5.00 on days with extra-curricular).
hamburgham wrote: » "teachers wanted..teachers wanted". We're bored listening to it.
maestroamado wrote: » I asked earlier if anyone here knows. What are the teachers looking for? I am getting opinions on the Minister here but i think this is about schools re-opening.
political analyst wrote: » Why is Norma such a poor education minister even though she was a teacher until she became a TD recently? After all, teaching is a job that involves leadership, doesn't it?
mayo londoner wrote: » Not at all, not sure how you came to that conclusion, 12 years in the private sector. Construction is a stressful industry with next to no thanks or progression but you get on with it, came to a stage where I value work life balance rather than money as I have a life outside of work unlike some and needed to relocate to a different part of the country as my girlfriend is situated here, wasn't sustainable for me to keep my current job, so any other assumption you want to throw out there?