biko wrote: » FIFA asks the female judges not to touch Sheikh Joaan bin Hamad Al Thani of Qatar. If your culture makes you act differently towards men and women then possibly your culture is ****. And if you enable this, like FIFA, then possibly you are a money grabbing ****.https://twitter.com/piotr_texel/status/1361730417670443010?s=20
Kivaro wrote: » I see that French MPs passed the anti-separatism bill today in order to battle Islamic radicalism, and it will come into law next year. Imagine having to pass a law in order to forbid virginity tests and certificates by doctors for Muslim and other religious marriages. About 1/3 of doctors in France have been asked to carry out these tests, with most of them refusing. How this archaic practice was ever allowed or acceptable in the first instance in any modern Western society is beyond any rational thinking mind. On Friday President Macron spoke out against radicalisation in some French Muslim communities, saying that there was a danger of them forming a "counter-society". These counter societies are already prevalent in some areas of France, where females are not allowed into cafes etc. We should hope that Ireland learns from the French experience, and actually stop problems occurring before the need to pass our own bills to forbid abhorrent behaviour ascribed to the culture or religion of large groups of people who migrate to Ireland. The people of Ireland should n'ot be required to adapt to the customs or beliefs of people who move to our country.
weldoninhio wrote: » FIFA president Gianni Infantino has hit back at "false rumours" he asked female referees not to greet a Qatari delegate during the Club World Cup medal ceremony.
biko wrote: » I doubt that. What else did you think he would say after the criticism? Why didn't you find any sources from the females? Why didn't the Sheikh at least wave? What do you think?
Kivaro wrote: » I see that French MPs passed the anti-separatism bill today in order to battle Islamic radicalism, and it will come into law next year. Imagine having to pass a law in order to forbid virginity tests and certificates by doctors for Muslim and other religious marriages. About 1/3 of doctors in France have been asked to carry out these tests, with most of them refusing. How this archaic practice was ever allowed or acceptable in the first instance in any modern Western society is beyond any rational thinking mind. On Friday President Macron spoke out against radicalisation in some French Muslim communities, saying that there was a danger of them forming a "counter-society". These counter societies are already prevalent in some areas of France, where females are not allowed into cafes etc. We should hope that Ireland learns from the French experience, and actually stop problems occurring before the need to pass our own bills to forbid abhorrent behaviour ascribed to the culture or religion of large groups of people who migrate to Ireland. The people of Ireland should not be required to adapt to the customs or beliefs of people who move to our country.
jmreire wrote: » You can take all the Muslims you like from the Islamic Country's, but you cannot take the Islam from the Muslim. And that is what he /she .will live by. No matter that they obey and observe the national laws of their adopted land while they have to, but they will still obey Sharia law, and follow the dictates of the local Mullah or Imam as much as is possible. And they will work endlessly to introduce Islamic law and way of life. It starts by "finding" ways in which local customs / laws agree with Sharia and the Islamic way of life.. then having established the ground work, it starts to insist on Muslim's being allowed to follow their own Culture., even when it contradicts the culture of the host / adopted Country. Its a well trodden path in other Countries , and it has started in Ireland. In Germany, which has a large Muslim population, the Germans maintain that there is only one law of the land, the German one, but where German and Sharia Law agree, they allow the Sharia to be used. Islam is now and has always been in expansion mode, by whatever means it can use.
bubblypop wrote: » So all Muslims will do this yes?
bubblypop wrote: » I'm not religious and it has no effect on my life whatsoever.
I don't agree that all Muslims will behave as you say. I too know many Muslims and there are plenty are a la carte, if you want to put it that way, about their religion.
bubblypop wrote: » I'm not religious and it has no effect on my life whatsoever. I don't agree that all Muslims will behave as you say. I too know many Muslims and there are plenty are a la carte, if you want to put it that way, about their religion.
[Deleted User] wrote: » You're not comparing like with like then. Perhaps you were religious once when you were young, but it's been many decades since Catholicism in Ireland had the influence over it's followers the way that Islam does. Likely, you have very limited experience of what such a religion would be like, unless you were born into something like the Jehova's witnesses, or another devout (hardline) sect. .
bubblypop wrote: » I am not 'open borders' I don't believe I have ever met anyone who thinks flooding a small island with hundreds of thousands of people is a good idea!
bubblypop wrote: » Posters on this thread are obsessed with Islam and Muslim people. I don't care where someone is from or what religion they are. People are people. I have had enough experience with people.
I am not 'open borders' I don't believe I have ever met anyone who thinks flooding a small island with hundreds of thousands of people is a good idea!
I only care that they live a good, legal, happy life. There's no need for the hysteria that is shown in this thread. I have no issue with people of any culture living in this country.
And there is no requirement, in my view, to prove why 'multiculturalism is a good thing' It is what it is.
bubblypop wrote: » And there is no requirement, in my view, to prove why 'multiculturalism is a good thing' It is what it is.
The_Kew_Tour wrote: » The paragraph above says it all really. At least this poster is honest enough to say that he can’t make a good point I guess. .
bubblypop wrote: » Because there is no need to.I'm not sure why anyone thinks there should be!
[Deleted User] wrote: » Have you noticed I haven't sought to discredit you? You might want to think on that for a moment. You have different experiences, which I disagree with, but you're entitled to that opinion, and also entitled to voice it. All the same, I don't appreciate the manner in which you do so. So, sure.. since you've decided to lower the tone of the discussion with phrases like obsessed and hysteria, I'll stop being respectful towards your opinions. .
bubblypop wrote: » Because there is no need to. I'm not sure why anyone thinks there should be!
bubblypop wrote: » That's very sensitive of you, at no stage did I target you in any personal way. Unlike your posts to me where you presume that I know nothing about religion, that I have very little interaction with Muslim people. Your posts are an attempt to shut me down. But I'm not interested in personal attacks.
Deleted User wrote: Likely, you have very limited experience of what such a religion would be like, unless you were born into something like the Jehova's witnesses, or another devout (hardline) sect.
Yellow_Fern wrote: » The diversity bandwagon is creating some nice jobs in the public sector https://www.universityvacancies.com/national-college-ireland/equality-diversity-inclusion-specialist-17057
The appointment will made to Senior Specialist/Supervisor salary band €40,600- €60,903 depending on experience
Eric Cartman wrote: » What in christs name... 40-60k a year to just scream at Irish men about how awful they are for existing.
bubblypop wrote: » What is wrong with encouraging and assisting people who may not normally attend third level, for a variety of reasons, attend and educate themselves? The job is for someone to do just that. Why would you have an issue with that?