lawrencesummers wrote: » He’s been blue raw useless in the second quarter of the first half
KaneToad wrote: » Sure. We have much better options at 9: Cooney Marmion Blade Casey is not (yet) international standard 9. Those guys are and offer us more.
TheCitizen wrote: » There has to be a better option than Burns.
lawrencesummers wrote: » In Freddie burns’s defence Sexton would have missed one of those place kicks as well.
awec wrote: » No. People are looking for issues with JGP and Burns because of the fuss that's been made about us playing with neither Sexton nor Murray. Sexton misses kicks all the time, and t's harsh to blame JGP for the try. They tore through us and the defence was scrambling. Both the half backs have been grand.
breezy1985 wrote: » Na Burns has sucked. His kicks for touch from penalties have been poor in terms of ground gained
TomsOnTheRoof wrote: » Ross Byrne has failed to impress on numerous occasions. Burns had a good Autumn. He **** the bed last week but he still has credit in the bank from November and rightly so. He deserves his shot. Personally I'd prefer to see Carty there but I don't have an issue with Burns being given a chance.
ecoli3136 wrote: » Do you mean a spent force or a beaten docket? I like my props ljke healy and my metaphors untortured.
StevenToast wrote: » Billy burns has been terrible....anyone can miss a kick...but the nature of the first miss was shocking.. Offers nothing in attack
nerd69 wrote: » Would you mind elaborating. more than he's just not good enough please