El_Duderino 09 wrote: » Isn’t it supposed to favour whoever is fastest and shouldn’t the fastest score the most points? It’s a gimmick to make qualifying a two stage process (quali sets the grid for the sprint race and the sprint race sets the grid for the actual race). And points are awarded for the actual race. It would mean there’s really two starts. And that starts are often amongst the best bits of a race( and it would probably suit Stroll who tends to gain places off the start).
quokula wrote: » No the plan is that qualifying on Friday decides the sprint race grid, like normal Saturday qualifying for a Sunday race. Then the sprint race gives points, in addition to setting the Sunday grid. So as the fastest team you get two wins for the price of one. Well it's 1.5 wins as the sprint race is half points, but you get the jist. While other teams might pull off the odd win here and there due to perfect strategy, taking advantage of the safety car, on track overtakes or Mercedes' mistakes, those races will make less headway overall in the championship compared to the double-victories Mercedes will get. The fact that the shorter sprint race will have zero opportunity for strategy variance will only compound this further. Original proposals for reverse grid sprint races and other more interesting formats all got vetoed by Mercedes. Rules don't get passed in the current era of F1 if there's a chance they can hurt Merc's dominance.
Fwox wrote: » Looks like Red Bull have achieved getting the engine freeze implemented with all the other teams in agreement. Be interesting to see if they can continue to develop the Honda PU further when Honda do pull out at the end of the season.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » If that's true, then i imagine cost tutting was a big factor. When wold the freeze happen? The ned of this year or start f next year or what? Puts a lot of pressure on Ferrari to get the new engine right, pretty much first time. And i wouldn't bet the house on Ferrari getting things fight first time.
Fwox wrote: » Saves all PU manufacturers a huge amount for sure, easy decisions. Comes into effect for the start of 2022 season. I’ve heard Ferrari are taking a similar approach to Merc in their power unit design at the moment, be nice as a RB fan to have another team to fight other than Mercedes.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » Hope Alonso’s ok. There seems to be a good chance of some sprint races this year.https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.broad-support-from-f1-teams-for-new-sprint-race-format-at-some-races.7o0u5or8wIxY62OgYYjtcY.html
Harika wrote: » Alonso in cycling accidenthttps://mobile.twitter.com/AlpineF1Team/status/1359954932800061441 Not much information, only that he is concious
mickdw wrote: » Reports of alonso be hit by / colliding with car. That cant be good for pre season testing and season start.
barryribs wrote: » Andrew benson saying it's a broken jaw. Hopefully it's nothing more serious than that
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » While I’m mot a fan of Paul Richard , and I do t think anyone else is a fan either. This must be good news.https://www.racefans.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/racefansdotnet-2021-02-10-23-03-29-4.jpg They reprofiled almost the entire track, all the corners except one. They had to work within the confines of the existing layout, but hopefully it will improve things a bit.
muckwarrior wrote: » Needs more stripes.
Top Dog wrote: » Alpine seem optimistic that Alonso will be fine for testing - https://www.planetf1.com/news/fernando-alonso-injury-update/
[Deleted User] wrote: » The pre-season hype is really wearing on me this year. The constant "Ooooh things could be shaken up with the aero changes" nonsense. The only wildcard is McLaren with the new engine but best case is they'll solidify 3rd in the championship. Aside from that it's gonna be as-you-were.