FunLover18 wrote: » Just call it Fast 11! If they end an 11 film franchise with Fast Ten parts 1 & 2, it will be the stupidest thing this franchise has ever done!
EoinMcLovin wrote: » Exactly, I think they are just trying to copy what Marvel did with Infinity War and Endgame
Penn wrote: » Everyone seems to do it with everything these days. So many TV series are splitting their final series into two parts. Even Bojack Horseman did it and it's a f*cking cartoon.
CastorTroy wrote: » Did that car intentionally go on its side through a building, into a truck?
pixelburp wrote: » I haven't watched the trailer but how many times does someone mention "family"?
EoinMcLovin wrote: » Surprisingly nobody does. Fast Family is mentioned in text though
pixelburp wrote: » Yeah, watched it there now; 9 movies in it feels redundant to even pass comment on the production at this stage ... but I'm always a little taken aback at how lazy and CGI-ridden the stuntwork is. Fadó fadó in ancient Hollywood, that car smashing through the store-fronts would either have been a (big)miniature or a real, practical stunt using compressed air or whatnot. But like I said, it's one of the most successful blockbuster franchises on the planet so what do I know
Tazzimus wrote: » Funnily enough, I just saw a clip from Justin Lin on that stunt and it is, in fact, practical. Just touched up (badly) with CGI.
pixelburp wrote: » That's ... actually kind of amazing. Notwithstanding the fact trailer CGI can be work-in-progress, the entire moment looked utterly fake. Do you have the clip, cos I kinda don't believe you
Tazzimus wrote: » I had to watch it a few times to believe they actually did it :pac: The CGI is very noticeable so you'd hope it gets refined a bit for the film.https://twitter.com/justinlin/status/1358563199948230656
pixelburp wrote: » Ah, that's interesting. If I'm right, and having watched it a couple of times: looks like during the first phase of the stunt, the car flops back down as its pulled through the shop. Whereas the actual crash into the truck is done with another prop already on a track. The CGI then must be stitching those two phases together - but the car is reduced to a full CGI creation 'cos the real ones don't match up. Was wondering why the car looked so fake, yet apparently real in situ... It's funny 'cos Fury Road had hundreds of CGI shots in the final feature, but mostly either colour grading or removing wires & tracks. The CGI cars in F&F have always looked super fake though, so not that convinced things will be any better in the final film...
Homelander wrote: » It's mad to think the first movie was about street racing and heisting trucks full of VCR's, and it somehow it evolved into "people who are good at driving cars save the world from nuclear apocalypse". I enjoy them, but they are almost in the territory of being so absurdly bad they're good.