MercuryBoy wrote: » So any podcast that discusses sporting events is journalism?
Lucas Hood wrote: » They said there will be a full football tomorrow.
duffman13 wrote: » No issue with that, just them saying on Thursday or Friday there was two pods on Monday while true, is a bit disingenuous when the total of the two pods was similar in length to the one they have been doing on a Monday.
EltonJohn69 wrote: » It does seem strange... another 15-20 minutes chatting over zoom and you got a decent podcast.... are they trying to get give Monday people a small taste of the football to get them to subscribe to the patreon ???
ReginaldSmythV wrote: » Soccer is easily the most popular thing they do so it makes sense to only give a brief taster today and put the rest behind the fee.
Beersmith wrote: » Makes more sense just to give it to the WS members on Monday!
ReginaldSmythV wrote: » Create more WS members to listen on Tuesday.
Beersmith wrote: » but why wait until Tuesday to do that! they could release a taster/teaser whatever on a Monday and still have a subscriber only football pod on Monday. I just don't see the reason why they need to wait until Tuesday. Football is the most popular segment and Monday discussion about the weekend action makes the most sense. They are risking losing more WS members than gaining them with this silliness IMO
ReginaldSmythV wrote: » Need to fill the week too though, and there was the six nations.
lawred2 wrote: » What's the issue? The Monday listeners don't pay the bills
Xavi6 wrote: » I gave the rugby a chance as I've complained a lot about it in the past but enjoy listening to the lads chat about most things. Still dull as dishwater with Horgan doing everything he could to make excuses for 'Peter' (first name basis is always a sign of what's to come). That's where the football and rugby coverage is night and day - the rugby contributors are relatively recently retired players who are still mates with the current crop and don't want to burn personal bridges. That will never work well, whereas the football journos have no personal connections really so they can go in two footed. I'm not saying it should be wall-to-wall bashing but the O'Mahony incident was braindead and cost the team badly so it should be treated that way imo.
redbuck wrote: » I thought last week's rugby show was good when it was just Simon on his own and they had the Welsh journo on. However it was back to the charisma black hole when the old pros came back yesterday.
al87987 wrote: » Certainly lots of moaning in here. Not a mention of the two new superb audiobeds (great to have Mark back full time). Seems like the Monday football podcast will be the lads discussing the weekend and Tuesday they will have on a couple of guests to review it. Not a bad way to do it at all.
Cienciano wrote: » Kinahan thing might be a bit close to home for comfort. Bbc journalists had their lives threatened. At least they don't live in Dublin and have the BBC behind them. Murph lives in Inchicore and gets the luas. I reckon you could walk around the clonliffe road for an hour and spot ken. I'd like to hear them cover it, but wouldn't blame them in the slightest if they avoid it.
Say Your Number wrote: » They spend 2-3 hours talking about the Premier League a week, does any specialist soccer pod spend that long on it, I doubt too many would un-sub because they have the gall to talk about something else on a Monday, have to say this thread has me scratching my head sometimes.
lawred2 wrote: » it used to be just one or two regulars with the old moan - seems to be more and more recently... strange thread of late alright
lawred2 wrote: » It's almost like you've no choice