lsheehaneire wrote: » APPLICATIONS OPEN for FE1S
Fe1Student20 wrote: » Hi guys, just after seeing that the application is open for March. Has anyone heard anything about when we might get our re-check results? Was hoping it would at least be prior to the application deadline at the end of this month, but if anyone had any info would be much appreciated.
FE1Hopefully1 wrote: » Does it let you click apply it says the form is not available to me
Deleted User wrote: » It was mentioned previously provisional date is Feb 19th.. I’ll wait until then anyway
Fe1Student20 wrote: » I clicked into it there, and didn't seem to be any issues. Just holding off on submitting application until the re-check results are back so didn't fully go through it
Twinings2016 wrote: » Hi all, thinking the following for tort... am I leaving anything out? also any predictions welcome - trespass/nuisance/Rylands v Fletcher - Duty of Care /negligence/ Standard of Care - Vicarious Liability - Defamation - Occupiers Liability - Trespass to the person - products liability - nervous shock - passing off - medical negligence - liability for animals - pure economic loss - concurrent wrongdoing/ contrib negligence - employers liability - limitation periods - negligence children & fire
awsah wrote: » did they change the time table? I had my revision timetable to do equity in week one and property and contract were on after another on week 2?!
FE1Hopefully1 wrote: » Yeah they changed it a few weeks back !
Lallers96 wrote: » When filling out the application I don't see the option to say you are an Access Student and some fees need to be waived?
fe1fi20 wrote: » are people doing constitutional interpretation for the exam? it came up in november and don't know whether its worth looking at
FE1Hopefully1 wrote: » Sorry what question was it on the November paper ?
fe1fi20 wrote: » “The Supreme Court’s decisions in Mohan v Ireland [2019] IESC 18 and P v Judges of the Circuit Court [2019] IESC 26 provide important clarifications on the rules relating to standing in Irish constitutional cases. In particular, the decisions highlight the ongoing significance of the jus tertii principle”. locus standi
FE1Hopefully1 wrote: » Sorry I thought you meant like the methods of interpretation came up !
fe1fi20 wrote: » oh no, but thats my question... do you think it might come up (different approaches e.g. broad, historical etc)
FE1Hopefully1 wrote: » It hasn’t been up in a while so I’m hoping it might appear not a bad one to know in case the rest are awful
fe1fi20 wrote: » any tips on studying for constitutional... i've failed it before and i'm honestly so nervous and dont even know how to approach the study for it
lsheehaneire wrote: » It popped up that I was an access student and I was able to complete it. Get onto them first thing.
Lallers96 wrote: » Which section did it come up for you?
FE1Hopefully1 wrote: » You are allowed have it beside you it’s said on the rules for the online exams. I just showed mine quickly when I first went to use it and that was it
BigSprogs wrote: » Ah grand job so, cheers! Anyone know where we can order copies from? For BNhE I'm guessing the official little blue book is fine. The regulations say "original copies" only and printoffs from the internet etc aren't allowed.. So where does one order "original copies" of the Sucession Act etc?
FE1Rookie wrote: » Has there been ANY information on HOW this online sitting will be conducted? Will they be sticking with BetterExaminations? Will it be typed again? Will we still have no option to do rough work in writing? There's still a lot of questions on a sitting that's only next month.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w1.vanillicon.com/v2/1c2638d40c8423fc1a2b2b1a2a01a3b9.svg)
