nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

The Daily bets, Banter and Accumulators thread V

ShamoBuc

New thread, same rules as before.

Good luck.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Loafing Oaf

Spurs/Lazio/Monaco/Lille/Sociedad/Barcelona/Frankfurt DC

brilou23

Skybet giving away 25 cash on there page to customers you only have to opt in.

mailburner

power prices petty miserable on pp for the spurs game

son two or more sot 11/10 (from 10/11) shocking stuff

spurshero

mailburner wrote: »

power prices petty miserable on pp for the spurs game

son two or more sot 11/10 (from 10/11) shocking stuff

There prices are shocking in general . Not sure why anybody used them . Very seldom best price in any market I check .

mailburner

Raving_Magic wrote: »

My mate has bet365 and it's the only reason he uses it since it pays out when team goes 2 nil up. It's for singles and accums aswell so you should be paid out

Had no idea and assumed it was only singles.
That's pretty amazing for any bookie to offer that for multiples

spurshero

mailburner wrote: »

Had no idea and assumed it was only singles.
That's pretty amazing for any bookie to offer that for multiples

Got an accum up before Xmas which had Southampton in to beat man united .they were 2 nil up and lost 3 2 . The accum paid out 4 figures for a fiver . I know this sounds like after timing I don’t mean it that way . I’m just trying to point out that anybody that does accas should do them there .

mailburner

spurshero wrote: »

There prices are shocking in general . Not sure why anybody used them . Very seldom best price in any market I check .

They are poor, though for a while there they had some good power prices and the odd certainty bet for 20.

I pretty much stopped doing the enhanced bets/power price bets unless for the odd fiver now as I'd probably done 10+ without getting one up especially ones with 3+ teams/players

The sot markets have been a goldmine for pp lately as far as I can see as few players seem to manage a sot in each half and pp probably owe the likes of werner a few pints.
son had a sot in a few mins midweek and nothing for the rest of the game, made the game pretty painful to watch....that's been the story of my sot bets

ShamoBuc

I had a accum lose with 365 yesterday, Dortmund lost, but Atalanta was marked as a winner because of early payout, they went 3 up and drew.

ShamoBuc

spurshero wrote: »

There prices are shocking in general . Not sure why anybody used them . Very seldom best price in any market I check .

I've checked a few of them and they've been clearly best prices. Any particular site or various?

spurshero

ShamoBuc wrote: »

I've checked a few of them and they've been clearly best prices. Any particular site or various?

No I just mainly do Acca . I always find when I compare them to 365 or Boyles there usually lowest payout.

ShamoBuc

mailburner wrote: »

power prices petty miserable on pp for the spurs game

son two or more sot 11/10 (from 10/11) shocking stuff

At least it won. Doubt he was more elsewhere though.

Wasn't on line earlier, or I would have been on this, simply because Kane was back.

ShamoBuc

Salah, Sterling and Mount over 0.5 sot at 5/1 worth a tenner I think. 365 have the treble at around 2.8/1

Aidan Harney

ShamoBuc wrote: »

Salah, Sterling and Mount over 0.5 sot at 5/1 worth a tenner I think. 365 have the treble at around 2.8/1

Mount?
Chelsea?

ShamoBuc

Yes

mailburner

sterling card 15/2 as short as 5/2 with pp
silva card 4/1
singles/double at 40/1
bet365

edit rubbish

ShamoBuc

15/2 is a great price for a Sterling card. Boyles at 7/1 then 9/2 is next best. Considering he is captain aswell he might be a little bit more fired up.

mailburner

my bb

so far I'm glad I didn't pick goalscorers as this is pretty tight
I think one goal might be enough to win this bar a piece of magic required
to open this up

Accumulator
134.69/1
Liverpool v Man City
Under 3.5 Goals - Over/Under 3.5 Goals
Fabinho - To Be Booked
Raheem Sterling - To Be Booked
Bernardo Silva - To Be Booked
Man City - Match Odds
Stake:
€5.00

mailburner

mailburner wrote: »

my bb

so far I'm glad I didn't pick goalscorers as this is pretty tight
I think one goal might be enough to win this bar a piece of magic required
to open this up

Accumulator
134.69/1
Liverpool v Man City
Under 3.5 Goals - Over/Under 3.5 Goals
Fabinho - To Be Booked
Raheem Sterling - To Be Booked
Bernardo Silva - To Be Booked
Man City - Match Odds
Stake:
€5.00

Unbelievable display by Alisson

bassy

mailburner wrote: »

Unbelievable display by Alisson

as bad as de gea

ShamoBuc

bassy wrote: »

as bad as de gea

Keep comparisons etc like that for the Soccer threads please.

bassy

Off topic

mailburner

last throw of the dice, both of these seen yellow twice in their last 4/5 games and the prices are decent imo

lundstrum 5/1 as low as 5/2 with boyles
egan 4/1
singles/double that never comes in at 30/1 also

both hills

I do think sheff utd will get a few cards, again I hope it's my two.

Edit. need to stop betting on cards

ShamoBuc

ShamoBuc wrote: »

Salah, Sterling and Mount over 0.5 sot at 5/1 worth a tenner I think. 365 have the treble at around 2.8/1

Winner.

All 3 scored in fact!

Loafing Oaf

Loafing Oaf wrote: »

Spurs/Lazio/Monaco/Lille/Sociedad/Barcelona/Frankfurt DC

Later realised I hadn't actually pulled the trigger on that bet, so did an amended version. Wonder of wonders, both landed:D

Danick

Palace game acca 3/1 bet365

Over 0 goals in the first half
Over 2.5 goals in the game
Over 7 corners in the game
Over 2 cards in the game

Good luck all

ShamoBuc

Bamford and Eze 1 or more sot at 2/1 pp

Piehead

ShamoBuc wrote: »

Bamford and Eze 1 or more sot at 2/1 pp

On this too. Seems decent bet

Lundstram

Pretty sure Eze had a SOT in the first half? Keeper saved it?

Piehead

Lundstram wrote: »

Pretty sure Eze had a SOT in the first half? Keeper saved it?

Nope. Bamfords had 3

ShamoBuc

Lundstram wrote: »

Pretty sure Eze had a SOT in the first half? Keeper saved it?

Hit the post i think, wasn't a corner