fe1fi20 wrote: » anyone need contract legislation? as good as new and unmarked..
rickmatt wrote: » Hi guys, So do they not send out a letter if you have all 8 passed or any form of documentation as evidence you have them, for like application etc.?
Wonderstruck wrote: » Supposedly but they're not that organised, I just used each individual results letter when applying to the PPC.
DavidX90 wrote: » That is quality stuff. Fair play! How big was the sample size in the end?
sim1yoyo wrote: » Has anyone received a response from Phillip Lee regarding traineeships? Got a generic we will revert back soon in November and nothing since. Just debating applying for the summer internship with them now
FE1Hopefully1 wrote: » Haha I can’t even do that seen as they never sent any results letter for me since March ��
BugsySiegel wrote: » Can anyone send me on an up to date Equity grid. Have one already but its missing a few sittings. I have notes I can swap.
jus_me wrote: » Anyone else get constitutional back with no marks or anything on it!Just says marks will be sent separately which seems odd
awsah wrote: » same with company!
jus_me wrote: » Did you get the second email ? I didn’t
awsah wrote: » nope!
Lallers96 wrote: » I have to admire the neatness of your criminal script. There wasn't a chance in hell I'd have had the time to format my answers so well on top of everything. Fair play, I'd say that alone made it easy for the examiner to give you marks
NewFe1 wrote: » I was thinking the same. My paper would look an absolute mess compared to that. Very impressive layout. Does everyone lay out their paper like that?
bluerthanu wrote: » If someone gets their contract script back in the next while, would you mind posting the questions here please?
awsah wrote: » Hi Everyone! so I got my criminal exam paper back, and I thought I would share it here. At the very least it has the November 2020 exam paper for people. but I am pretty happy with the markings on it, it gives at least a vague indication of where I went right (compared to my company paper that had zero marks on it). I got 62% so people can use it to gauge how much they need to write for online exams, structuring, how many cases I used etc. This should not be used as a form of sample answer and no one should be learning what I have written because 38% of the paper is wrong, and you can't be sure if I spoke about the wrong case somewhere or was talking complete rubbish for a few sentences. i was absolutely howling at the mistakes I made, it reads like a person whose brain was fried after my third exam in a row! I am impressed, though, at how much information my brain retained, and it gives me hope for the next set, that I will somehow pull it out of the bag!
Wonderstruck wrote: » I can't believe you didnt answer the question on the bees!https://youtu.be/xHGntwEikUQ Congrats!
Sunflowers8 wrote: » Thanks for sharing, really sound of you. Do you know what the W marks the examiner mark mean? Versus the ticks
Dropin wrote: » Has any fellow FE1 gambler left " Trial in due Course of Law and Right to a Jury Trial " (City College manual presentation) out of their Constitutional studies? Unless my grid is wrong its a fairly regular topic but one that doesn't cross over with other topics. Il admit, I am prone to rolling the dice for these exams but the sheer size of the topic leaves me concerned. Thanks