rainbowtrout wrote: » But if they are struggling with the material at LC level, how are they going to cope with college level material?
rainbowtrout wrote: » But if they are struggling with the material at LC level, how are they going to cope with college level material? If they have an aptitude for science, they should be able to show that at LC level. Not sure I want people to land into science degrees with poor grades in science and hope they improve and then send them out into schools to teach the subject. It's hard to foster a love of science (or any other subject) in students if you barely understand the material yourself. One of the common gripes we see on here and elsewhere on social media is people complaining about teachers and how rubbish their teacher was for X subject. I don't want to see a situation where teaching standards fall because teachers don't know their subject. I had a student teacher last year just before the lockdown started, and for the first time I was amazed at how poor she was. Many will find their first teaching practice a steep learning curve in terms of classroom management and you give them leeway for that. But her lack of knowledge of basic science was shocking. Two weeks in I was wondering how much damage limitation I was going to have to implement to get my classes back up to speed. I can compare because she was doing the degree I hold.
am_zarathustra wrote: » Oh the stats on this will be interesting! Wonder will it push towards or away from the desire for predicted grades
itrip wrote: » Well done Kieran (Asti), this week he's been excellent in media interviews...
Random sample wrote: » It’s unbelievable that we are here again.
shesty wrote: » Who were they aiming for approval from by not making a backup plan though?Political optics doesn't really make sense, although you would hope the other likely option (incompetence...) wasn't it either.Surely they would realise the potential fallout from closures and no back up plan would be way worse than their approach of opening and no discussion of anything else. It is beyond unbelievable we are here again.Complete failure.
carr62 wrote: » Omg does anyone predict we will hear today of what's going to happen to LC? I know it's almost cliché at this stage about stress... but my son had an episode yesterday.....a complete fit of sobbing that he is unable to cope with trying to sit in one spot morning til night, with school, then homework, then study. On top of that trying to put the pieces of lessons together after getting constant disconnections. I was so shocked, as I thought he was coping as well as anyone. That's it now as far as I'm concerned. If he never sat the leaving cert, he is taking a break until we get some official word about what's going to happen. I hope we hear something today. Am I expecting too much?
shesty wrote: » The lack of information and a definite date is giving me awful stress all, and I am only a working parent trying to homeschool.It is keepign me awake at night wondering how much longer I can survive this, vs how much longer I might HAVE to survive it. I can only imagine the stress LC students are under, it is all just so wrong. As parents I would email your TDs and the National Parent's Council and everyone you can think of and keep telling them about the state of your kids and you.It might seem silly, and mightn't solve it alone, but if enough people keep applying pressure across the board it might push pressure overall to get it solved quicker.It's about keeping the issue fresh in their minds. Don't sit there enduring it in silence.
History Queen wrote: » Fresh from Carl o Brianhttps://www.irishtimes.com/news/education/what-alternative-options-are-under-review-for-2021-leaving-cert-1.4471108?mode=amp
am_zarathustra wrote: » Regardless if what happens, even if we have to go full PG then at least the kids would have a plan. The limbo is really dangerous for their mental health!
Treppen wrote: » Here is where I diverge with the "uncertainty" train of thought. There's a LC course to be covered. That is the certainty. Students should be told to Keep the head down while everyone else is losing theirs, do the work the teachers assign you as best you can just like every other LCs had to do in previous years. What's the worst that can happen... You learn something that won't be examined!! Only 2 options: Learn or don't. It's the hysteria that's dangerous for mental health, not learning.
Wombatman wrote: » Now that are expected to spend every hour that God sends in their rooms focusing on and thinking about the LC.
Wombatman wrote: » The last thing they deserve is your learn or don't learn hard line, or your dismissal of the fact that all the change and uncertainty is upsetting for some.
indolent wrote: » They aren't expected to do this though. Considering the time that is "wasted" getting to/from school, attendance, assemblies etc. , students have the chance to finish their work at a decent hour. That is of course contingent on them not going on to twitter to vent their apparent frustration on having to sit a lc ... I would find the undue attention afforded to this subject by the media more upsetting. And it is a tough and important lesson to learn. Lecturers won't be too bothered if you refuse to engage because it's upsetting.