Varik wrote: » Episode 4.Woo seems to have been practicing his close up magic.
shawki wrote: » In Marvel we Trust. Opening took me by surprise, took me a minute to realise what was happening. On a unrelated note, I guess this confirms that all the people who got blipped while on a plane didn't have a happy ending since Monica returned to the exact same spot she was in 5 years ago.
dingledosser wrote: » 1-3 were sh1te, but 4 was superb. To be honest, I think you could skip 2 and 3 without missing much.
FunLover18 wrote: » To suggest you could skip the episode where Wanda is pregnant and gives birth to twins and ejects another character, fúcking hell.
dingledosser wrote: » Both of these also happen in ep 4!
tbahh wrote: » makes people subscribe for longer and therefore earn the House of M more money.
FunLover18 wrote: » Wanda isn't even pregnant until the end of episode 2 and Monica/Geraldine doesn't show up till episode 2 either so her ejection means nothing.
tbahh wrote: » This is why a lot of people are frustrated. They want it all now, à la Netflix, and are not happy to have to wait around. I, too, have often fallen prey to this Netflix state of mind, but I must admit that I'm enjoying the weekly release of Wandavision. If anything, I find the episodes are a bit too short. As you soon as you get into one, the closing credits aren't too far away.
tbahh wrote: » Controversial opinion but I would have preferred if Episode 4 had happened later. I know more sitcom eras are going to be used going forward but the mystery of it has been taken away a bit.
shawki wrote: » #UnintendedReference
AlmightyCushion wrote: » No, people are frustrated because the first 3 episodes were shíte. It has nothing to do with not being able to binge watch it. There are plenty of great shows that are released weekly that don't get the same response. That is because those shows aren't ****e. We can see this show is going somewhere potentially great so is worth sticking with but it means having to put up with the rubbish that is the sitcom side of things. The solution here was to make the sitcom side of things actually decent. I would agree with you here. I loved the mystery part of it and would love to have seen it teased out a bit more. However, I have a feeling it's going to be a split between the sitcom and the real world from now on so it was necessary to do this episode now. On the positive side, the sitcom parts taking up less of the screen time should make the episodes far, far better.
tbahh wrote: » As an aside, the name is starting to make more sense now since it is apparently Wanda's vision of this new world, even going as far to set up Wanda as the villain in her own story. However, I think it'll be probably be Kathryn Hahn's character who is the main baddie and somehow manipulating Wanda in this distorted reality.
Penn wrote: » Yeah I'm guessing there's more to it than it just being Wanda who created this off her own back. Even the little bit of her we saw at the funeral in Endgame, while obviously still grieving for Vision, trapping an entire town of people in an alternate reality bubble she created to bring Vision back doesn't seem like something she would have done three weeks later. I also doubt they would have Wanda be the villian for the show, so there's definitely more going on and someone else who helped engineer this.
pah wrote: » I'm enjoying this immensley. For the people complaining that it should be released altogether why don't you just wait and binge it? I'd love to know the age breakdown between the 2 viewpoints on this.
RobbingBandit wrote: » Don't get this oneContinuity error the people coming back from the snap all rematerialised right where they vanished