Timing belt wrote: » if the work is undertaken outside Ireland then the companies could have a tax liability in the country the work is undertaken. It makes no difference if it is agency staff or staff directly employed.
Marius34 wrote: » To be honest, different experience is very interesting to me, and a case of people working from their home countries. It's very unusual times, how this will end up. If you really work outside Ireland, for Irish company there is difficult tax implications. Since person working 183 days in other country by default becomes a tax resident of that country.
Reins wrote: » On the PPR next to sold price is ** anyone know what that means?
Graham wrote: » ** - Denotes Not Full Market Price
Reins wrote: » Any particular reason they're marked in this way?
In a small number of transactions included in the Register the price shown does not represent the full market price of the property concerned for a variety of reasons. For example, the price declared may reflect the retention of an interest in the property by the previous owner, or the fact that a part or fraction only of the property is being purchased; alternatively, the property may have been purchased at a reduced price under the Affordable Homes Scheme. In addition, in a very small number of cases, properties may be declared as purchased in exchange for other property, stocks and shares, etc. All such properties are marked **.
Reins wrote: » what does one gain from knowing this information?..
virginmediapls wrote: » Anyone else starting to get the feeling there will be a crash next year? We've just gotten mortgage approved again, but...starting to think we'll hold off 'til the end of approval.
PropQueries wrote: » Not at all. The “permanent establishment” scare is put out by the revenue and the tax advisors so they won’t lose the business. Given the existing large EU presence of these companies, any EU country could have established it pre-covid anyway if they so wished.
TheSheriff wrote: » I would suggest reading this equivalent thread starting from ~ 3 years back. The crash is always going to happen 'next year'.
TheSheriff wrote: » The right to 'request' to WFH is very different to the 'right' to work from home. Look to industries which have been doing this for years, pharma etc and you will see how this pans out. John who wants to WFH 2/3 days a week will likely be allowed to, after they pass some certain predetermined time by the company (my last employer was 1 year). John will ultimately (unfairly) have poorer career progression, presence in the company etc, whatever way you want to call all that office *bull*. It's true for companies with a hybrid approach. Others will choose to work in the office, pay more money etc. Both will have a different quality of life, whose is better depends on your prefence. Some will leave Dublin, some might move to another part of Dublin etc. All Dublin based young professionals are not looking to flock to rural Ireland to live that country life they always wanted.
JimmyVik wrote: » But then over 40 is a different story. Most people including myself would be happy to move back down the country once married and settled. But for that to happen you need buy in about schools, spouses workplace, spouse as well as yourself and your employer. Thats a lot of juggling.
Cyrus wrote: » anyway back to property i wonder what the story with this place is, there is almost certainly a story https://www.myhome.ie/residential/brochure/huntington-outfarm-castleknock-dublin-15-castleknock-dublin-15/4480969 the boards posse have already been on the casehttps://www.boards.ie/vbulletin//showthread.php?t=2058038040
virginmediapls wrote: » Anyone else starting to get the feeling there will be a crash next year?
fliball123 wrote: » Props has selective amnesia when he has been proven wrong
Cluedo Monopoly wrote: » I told my manager this week that I would work from home for the rest of 2021. They are downsizing the office space when the lease runs out in July. The plan is to bring in a hotdesk program. I will probably move to 1 day in the office in 2022. I know 2 guys elsewhere that are doing their WFH in Spain and Portugal respectively. They gave up their leases and are renting cheap beside the sea. I don't think their employer knows. My employer wouldn't have a clue if I was away.
Cyrus wrote: » not so sure on that either while it certainly holds more appeal at this stage you may already have kids in school and career aspirations that wont be met by moving away, we looked at it and decided to stay put
MacronvFrugals wrote: » It's trivial to pull logs from a VPN which identify the source log in country you're coming from. In fact i know this happens, our place offers managed networking as a service and over the last 6 months many requests have came in from clients wanting to know where users are and specifically "users outside of Ireland" i presume this is for tax purposes like other posters mentioned.
DataDude wrote: » Also saw this yesterday and couldn't work it out at all! Seems too good to be true. Comments on other thread re. planning for apartments would make sense. On the topic of too good to be true - this was on the market for a long time a 950 (seems to have gone sale agreed in last couple of days). I have no desire to live in an apartment or in Saggart...but wow!https://www.myhome.ie/residential/brochure/504-swiftwood-saggart-co-dublin-d24-nn63/4446109
JimmyVik wrote: What, he is never wrong Sometimes I think he must be a politician in real life. The way politicians get caught out on a lie and just continues on like nothing happened.
awec wrote: » Real stink of tiger McMansion off that thing.
fliball123 wrote: » would rather a McMansion as apposed to a McShoebox... If you were offered it for free would you not live there?
