dog_pig wrote: » I would really like to be able to support this talented young activist but I find her use of racial epithets very troubling. I thought this is the exact type of thing that we are trying to get away from? It's hard to take articles like the one below at face value when she uses such racist terms.https://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/people/young-people-and-activism-you-can-t-stand-by-and-hope-everything-s-going-to-be-okay-1.4461250
weldoninhio wrote: » Had a look at her Twitter page. Seems to hate white women for some reason. One of her most recent tweets is "I wonder what it is that makes me inspiring?"
weldoninhio wrote: » Sorry I should have been pedantically clear. Only speaking their own language and only socialising with their own countrymen. Making no effort to learn English or integrate whatsoever. Turning their enclave into a mini Pakistan/Somalia/Bangladesh, of which there are many in the UK.
Pixel Eater wrote: » I can't be the only one who fines the term 'White Irish' weird? We wouldn't say 'Black Nigerian' or 'Brown Pakistani' as, well, that's the default race of those peoples/nation. It comes across as a quite a loaded and pointed term.
CruelCoin wrote: » It's no more weird than using "African American" as opposed to just using "American". Why does the term strike you as weird?
weldoninhio wrote: » Had a look at her Twitter page. Seems to hate white women for some reason.
Pixel Eater wrote: » The same reason using the terms 'Black Nigerian' or 'Brown Pakistani' would be weird; it's the race of those peoples and seems unnecessary. The native Irish are white by default in the same way and the overwhelming majority are that colour. You use descriptor term to describe the outliers rather than the default, true of anything but also people ie. White South Africans. And I would say 'American' myself to describe anyone from the US, whether they were white, Asian, black or whatever. And isn't 'African American' a term that black people coined themselves or at least prefer themselves to be called? Also, seems the term - 'White Irish' - is usually used in a negative sense whenever I can across it.
Granadino wrote: » I remember Conan O'Brien mentioning something about being "Irish", turns out his ancestors moved to the US around the famine time.
Effects wrote: » 93% of Americans call themselves Irish though.
Wibbs wrote: » Well it might because from her perspective as a Black woman ,White women are a) held as the beauty ideal and b) White middle class women are about the most protected demographic in Western society and the progressives among that demographic rarely if ever regard non White women's issues beyond tokenism. Black women are quite invisible in many ways. You may recall the government campaign for early learning graphics posted earlier in the thread, where Ireland was apparently a wonderful imaginary land of interracial couples. What was immediately obvious was there were no White men, but maybe not so immediately obvious to a White audience was that there was another group missing from that ham fisted shangri la; Black women. You see this strong trend in wider advertising too. Interracial couples are almost always Black man/White woman. The reverse very much absent. Now some suggest that White man/Black woman images harken to some racist colonialism stuff going on, because White men are always in power(tm) and that's why they're avoided, or it's simply not seen as "photogenic" enough for advertisers and audiences. And that advertising audience is very much slanted towards women and the majority are White women. That's before we look at the lightening of Black women's skin in advertising, or the straightening of hair. When was the last time you saw a dark skinned Black woman with her natural hair in advertising? So yeah, if I were a young Black woman I'd imagine I'd be somewhat disgruntled too. Because as we've noted true multiculturalism in the western sense is only welcome when darker skin is added to paler skinned nations. Never the other way around. "White Nigerian" would have a very different connotations and mostly negative ones.
fantaiscool wrote: » I totally get where she's coming from.
fantaiscool wrote: » . Does feminism apply to black women? I don't think so. There are plenty of things to tackle, plenty of double standards to point out.
biko wrote: » Africans are quite successful in America. Like Elon and Charlize for example.
Scoondal wrote: » Huh ? Who is from Africa ?
Burkie1203 wrote: » I see that Joseph dope is whinging again about black unemployment in covid times. Black Africans unemployment is 8 times higher then native Irish. These people are allowed spout some sh1te unchallenged. Its dangerous. Where i work, there is about 250 people and all are Irish AFAIK. All lifers in civil service basically. Blanch has the highest covid rate now. Shock horror
TomTomTim wrote: » Sorcha Pollak pushing race baiting articles again. I'm shocked.
TomTomTim wrote: » I've seen someone else where claim that this purely tactical. Making subs groups of "Irish" people is a way of justifying what will likely come in the future, which is multiculturalists telling us that Ireland was always a melting pot, just like America. When your countries always been a melting pot, it's harder to argue against immigration. That's the theory anyway.
weldoninhio wrote: » I had this argument with a “woke” Irish person yesterday. Blaming racism on everything is hurting black people more than anything else. In a domestic abuse situation, the aggressor will normally grind down the victim telling them they are ‘useless, you are lucky I love you because no one else will, you’re worthless and everyone knows it’ etc. It manipulates then and enforces that view their eyes and they believe it. If you keep telling black people that every bad thing happens to them is racism. Didn’t get the job - racism, white boyfriend dumped me - racism, taxi didn’t stop for me - racism, brought me a glass of Ribena - racism, attacking a Garda with a knife got me shot - racism. Then all they’re gonna see is racism. It becomes their only viewpoint because they are constantly told that’s the issue and eventually they believe it. And of course, the more minorities screaming racism, the more money NGOs and “charities” get to battle this far-right boogeyman who’s perpetrating all of this racism. It’s a circle perpetuated by those who see an easy buck.
Sir Oxman wrote: » The IT is awful.https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/we-must-ask-obvious-question-over-shooting-of-george-nkencho-1.4469395 Here's an opinion piece yesterday by an assistant professor of advanced European Union law at Dublin City University on the Nkencho incident (the thread on here was shuttered as it 'wasn't ongoing' so nowhere to put this bar here) The completely disingenuous opening paragraph sets the rest of his agenda. Of course, anyone following the incident/aftermath will know it was some of our 'great and good' (the Pollacks of the political and media world) that within an hour of it decided the AGS 'systemic racism' was the most pertinent thing to announce and it was all about the skin. Nothing racist in that at all. Awful stuff."Why is it so difficult for people to even consider whether there may have been a racial dimension to the fatal shooting of 27-year-old George Nkencho by gardaí in the front garden of his family home in Clonee, west Dublin, on December 30th? The answer to this question lies in the answer to another: are you a racist?"
fantaiscool wrote: » Struggling to understand how you're an expert on the racism black people face despite never experiencing it yourself.
section4 wrote: » some people have been listening to this for 30 years and can see a pattern, the problem with these people is they know nothing about irish history and lump irish people in with english americans and so on, to them if you are white then you are racist, and it been going on for at least 30 years since i was in london, one wonders why if we are racist why are they here, the african americans were brought to the US as slaves and had no choice but these people have every choice,