Bishop of hope wrote: » An ever exposing world we live in. As time goes by and the Hurlers on the ditch get drawn in to the game it usually does expose their weakness. Some even have a weak game on the ditch, not management material, destined for ditch hurling. A lot happy with that too, make their living off of it, convince their listeners and advocators that because they can talk the game they should get something out of it. The manager and team out there playing the game, be it good or bad, while the ditchers talk away and pick up managers wages.
James Brown wrote: » Again I stated IMO people swung from FF to FG and back again. In 2020 the swing away was due to the numerous crises. If you disagree that's cula bula. There was/is a housing/homeless/health crises. Well documented and we broke records in areas such as child homelessness. ******** As usual I see a discussion on societal crises has turned on the poster and shinners and bombs...desperate.
Floppybits wrote: » The issue now is where do these people swing to now that both FF and FG are in government and are jointly responsible? Welcome to boards political discussion where someone will criticise the government the government supporters response will be yeah but what about the bombs and Northern Ireland rather than trying to defend the position as to why the government have gone a certain way and around and around we go. Oh yeah and if you hold a different opinion to those government parties then be prepared to be called a shinner even if you have never voted for them.
James Brown wrote: » I think SF will do as good but I can't see them getting a majority any time soon. Too many self interested people to let FF/FG go despite what damage they do on the whole. I think FG picking up the slack left by FF and vice versa will continue but I also don't see FF/FG getting a majority any time soon. We'll likely have a mish mash next government. We need hear more from the like of the SD's, PBP etc.
RandomViewer wrote: » The two old dolls are unlikely to stand again for the SDs so that'll be more or less it for them, PBP would not be my thing and they'd make a lot of others nervous as well,
James Brown wrote: » So what was your point you picked up off of Jingles post about cash? You never made a point, (neither did Jingles) just asked me questions. Again I stated IMO people swung from FF to FG and back again. In 2020 the swing away was due to the numerous crises. If you disagree that's cula bula. There was/is a housing/homeless/health crises. Well documented and we broke records in areas such as child homelessness. ******** As usual I see a discussion on societal crises has turned on the poster and shinners and bombs...desperate.
Bishop of hope wrote: » If you see the shinners mentioned in MY last few posts it can only be yourself inserting shinner in there.
James Brown wrote: » By ******** I was showing a separation. I was speaking on the thread. I note you've not addressed the portion that did relate to you. Were you just throwing up Cash to deflect?
Bishop of hope wrote: » Johnny or Margaret? Made my point in the post last night if you read it. Gaming or entitled, which is which. How does someone become entitled and how do you know whose entitled and whose gaming and isn't being entitled a bit of gaming even? Point today, if you can convince people you'll accept them as entitled and fight for their cause if they vote for you, then you're gaming. But you're the one picking up the cheque at the end of the day and your voters still aren't one more bit entitled. Its mad isn't it.
James Brown wrote: » So you genuinely meant Johnny Cash the singer was gaming the Irish housing system? It's highly unlikely Bish :rolleyes: I mentioned the crises. A poster inquired about Margret Cash. You followed with three questions regarding Margret Cash and if there were more like her. You answered none of my questions. Gaming is using a system in place. Cash did nothing illegal did she? So technically she was entitled. You are using Margret Cash and an undefined anecdotal number of others to say what about the housing/child homeless crises exactly? The analogy to politicians stands; if I throw up Lowry or Haughey etc. (numerous others) can I argue against giving politicians any monetary responsibility? Or do we try tackle and police the system better? My original point was rather than the traditional back and forth between FF/FG, some of the electorate went elsewhere, IMO, due to the record breaking crises.
RandomViewer wrote: » Anyone else get a hit on PAYE this week ?
CrazyFather1 wrote: » You will be waiting a while to get an answer around this forum Better off posting here: https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=10
Bishop of hope wrote: » Hardly forty shades of green Johnny now. A male name comparison just. Your opinion on why isn't necessarily right though that point is taken. It can be portrayed as that and loads of arguments that things could be better can be made.But going back to where we were 10 years ago it's a miracle we are where we are. But if you want to trap a chicken or pheasent, even though he is in a good feed field or yard, scatter a few seeds of oats along a dusty path he will follow that trail till he lands himself in your trap.
Bishop of hope wrote: » He might be trying to make a point as well as asking.
CrazyFather1 wrote: » Normally this thread is full of responses by the second, question about PAYE and tumbleweed. :P
Bishop of hope wrote: » I'm self employed RV, but I was talking to a lad earlier today said something about it, in a phone shop, he gets paid monthly. No conversation on it, but he said he got an extra hit this month.
smurgen wrote: » The usual FFG cheerleaders in here pissing and moaning. Jasyis. Do ye lads do any work or is this work? They should really add management at the end of strategic communications unit. Would do much for the meaning but the acronym would be on point then.
CrazyFather1 wrote: » Top posters on this thread. FrancieBrady 817 James Brown 678 smurgen 536
Bubbaclaus wrote: » Lol that blew back badly
smurgen wrote: » Era best not to mention the other threads those that go bump in the night. Some truly disgruntled folk about!
Cluedo Monopoly wrote: » We have had great ammunition to be fair and their antics are very very very hard to defend. Even Blanch gives up Most enjoyable government in decades. They've made the lockdowns fly by Can you believe that Golfgate was only 5 months ago? May they have many more months of it! Who knew the end of Civil War politics would be so rewarding...
