RobbieTheRobber wrote: » For a country with 29% of the population made up by immigrants its hardly negative either.
CtevenSrowder wrote: » Australia has very strict immigration control. The kind that many here call for. Klaz, for example, has in the past. Yet you use Australia as an example of how immigration is welcomed yet call Klaz a racist for wanting an Australian style immigration policy. Doesn't add up.
RobbieTheRobber wrote: » 240,000 in 2019 is hardly that restrictive. Roughly an increase of 1% on the population by inward migration in 2019
CtevenSrowder wrote: » It is restrictive in the sense of who can get in. This is why Klaz was earlier alluding to nuance and others talked of your simplistic view of things.
RobbieTheRobber wrote: » Some interesting points for a thread on multicultiurism from that link Invidious.Top 4 countries by percentage of immigrants Australia (29%), More immigrants 18% About the same 42% less/none 38% (60% positive) Israel (24%), More immigrants 9% About the same 15% less/none 73% (Overwhelmingly negative) Canada (22%) More immigrants 19% About the same 53% less/none 27% (72% positive) Sweden (18%). More immigrants 14% About the same 33% less/none 52% (47% positive) Interestingly apart from Israel the other 3 from the top 4 countries for immigrants in their country in the study are not overwhelmingly negative. Australia and Canada seem to view immigration positively based on the survey and the Swedish numbers would need more understanding to see which way the none and fewer breaks down. Obviously Israel is a different kettle of fish in terms of its religious makeup and the likely religious makeup of immigrants seeking to enter the country.
James Brown wrote: » Israel have a specific type that want/allow. They could do with being positive towards the people they landed on. Diversity is a great thing. Not to be confused with open boarders. Simply have an agreed criteria for entry.
RobbieTheRobber wrote: » It has moved modestly on immigration in that period but was not starting from a negative position. The key take is that immigration is still viewed positively in the whole in Europe. Contrary to what some posters in this thread would have us believe.
What's with the mystery wibbs what is this key point I'm avoiding ask it straight and see if I avoid.
I notice you never came back to accept your assertion that the recent referendums where not overwhelming supported was wrong despite one having over 66% support and the other over 80% support very much contrary to your claims.
RobbieTheRobber wrote: » In what way? Demographics of Australian population Total Australian-born 17,836,000 Total foreign-born 7,529,570 England England 986,460 Mainland China Mainland China[C] 677,240 India India 660,350 New Zealand New Zealand 570,000 Philippines Philippines 293,770 Vietnam Vietnam 262,910 South Africa South Africa 193,860 Italy Italy 182,520 Malaysia Malaysia 175,920 Sri Lanka Sri Lanka 140,260 Scotland Scotland[D] 133,920 Nepal Nepal 117,870 South Korea South Korea 116,030 Germany Germany 112,420 Greece Greece 106,660 United States United States 108,570 Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR[E] 101,290
Wibbs wrote: » It depends entirely on which study one reads. QV Invidious' link It was one point and you literally quoted it, but then went off on a different tack. I was talking about how some migrant cultures attitudes are deeply conservative on a few matters we take for granted and then you went off on an entirely different debate about attitudes towards immigration from native populations. You can't seem to even get your referenda straight. Your original post referenced abortion and SSM, then when I questioned how not so overwhelming they were and that a third or over of Irish people ticked nay, now you bring in the divorce referendum with an actually stronger voting return in favour. Speaking of referenda, the one to close the loophole for anchor babies got 80% too and not a single voting area returned below the 70% plus mark, even in the normally progressive south county Dublin region, so by your metric that's overwhelming too and clearly sending the message that a large proportion of Irish people had had enough with the influx on non EU nationals giving birth here and getting residency/citizenship from it. The usual vested interests were screaming "racism" in the run up to that vote and after it too. It's quite simple and the countries referenced are quite different in a few ways. Israel is a recent colony that was founded and relied upon immigration along very ethnic lines to form and grow. Australia and Canada are ex colonial nations founded upon and reliant upon immigration to survive. Those nations simply wouldn't exist without it. When such nations start to fill up like Israel, they dial back on their constant need for more bodies. America another example. To get into America a century ago you just had to turn up to Ellis island with limbs intact and not riddled with TB and you were in. Today their criteria is a lot more stringent if you want to enter legally and because of the demographic shift in the country they've become more hardened against immigration, particularly non White immigration over the last couple of decades(today about half the babies born in the US aren't White, a few decades ago it was under 20%). Sweden is not an ex colony, it's a European state and has about a decade or so on us as far as larger numbers of immigrants. Sweden that bastion of progressive thought and yet over half of Swedes polled want no more immigration, a third want the status quo to remain and only 14% want to increase numbers. There's bugger all positive about that and shows attitudes are hardening and I will bet they'll harden further. I'd like to see the difference in Swedish attitudes between urban and rural Swedes. Modern Multiculturalism is an almost entirely urban phenomenon and that's where all the problems lay. TL;DR? One can't compare ex colonies that were founded upon and required immigration to survive and European nations that didn't. There is a very different set of dynamics going on. Never mind that those self same ex colonies don't exactly have a great record with regard to interethnic strife and still do.
Wibbs wrote: » None from Africa or the Middle East for a start. It seems they're biased towards east Asians and Whites.
RobbieTheRobber wrote: » Aren't we an ex colony?
RobbieTheRobber wrote: » Hold up there Steven I am engaging in good faith. I did not present the data I am merely reviewing the data from a link provided by someone else. Please keep your abuse to yourself it's really not civil.
RobbieTheRobber wrote: » So why don't we just say that. That you believe Africans and people from Muslim countries are the problem. I presume you stated Whites in there to indicate you believe the South Africans who migrate to Australia are mainly white. Although I have no data for that so will have to take your word.
Wibbs wrote: » South Africa has suffered from a lot of White flight from the country since Black Africans gained power(and fair enough it's their bloody country)..
Justin Credible Darts wrote: » This is why unskilled workers are not a good addition to this or any european country, Australia have the right idea, I have no doubt because the australian government is doing what a proper government should do and put its own welfare and that of its citizens first, some wannabe woke liberal will try to claim its all racism or some other nonsense. Pity we did not have a government that would represent the people that put them in power in the first place
bubblypop wrote: » You do know non eu immigrants need to have a visa to come to Ireland, just like Australia? And Australia take in asylum seekers & refugees, just like Ireland?
CtevenSrowder wrote: » It was not meant as abuse. Apologies if it came across that way, but I was merely repeating what others have said, and was giving an example as to why.
Justin Credible Darts wrote: » I do , but they are more strict than here. I am all for people coming here to work, go to all the restaurants, see the foreigner cooks, staff, go to the hospitals see the different nationalities all working, all welcome additions to this country. My issue is the thousands of unskilled workers with no jobs coming here from places like lagos, ending up on housing estates living on handouts, that I pay for, whilst our own citizens on the housing list get jumped. And poor people with no prospects are more likely to resort to crime, its not rocket science.
RobbieTheRobber wrote: » Steven I can only review the links presented in front of my and ask questions of it. Unlike many in this thread I am always willing to have any preconceived ideas challenged. I hopr I have proven this by reading all the numerous links and studies presented. As evidenced now by the fact that i read a link and began querying the data. You effectively called me simple minded and even a simple minded person like me can understand that is meant s an insult.
RobbieTheRobber wrote: » So recent posts have indicated that most postets do not have an issue with multiculturalism so long as it excludes black Africans and Asian Muslims. Would this be fair to say?
Justin Credible Darts wrote: » I know black , asian and oriental people not only born here, but their parents born here, they are Irish, simple as that, and if you are born in south africa, black or white you are south african, this notion that because they are white its not their country now is obsolete
RobbieTheRobber wrote: » So recent posts have indicated that most posters do not have an issue with multiculturalism so long as it excludes black Africans and Asian Muslims. Would this be fair to say?
RobbieTheRobber wrote: » Interestingly apart from Israel the other 3 from the top 4 countries for immigrants in their country in the study are not overwhelmingly negative.
Invidious wrote: » You've claimed that immigration is viewed positively in Europe. But the Pew Research Center study shows that the majority (51 percent) of Europeans want fewer or no more migrants coming into their countries, while 35 percent want about the same number, and only 10 percent want more. If immigration were perceived as such a positive thing, surely more than 10 percent would want more of it? Another issue here is the effort to represent those who want fewer immigrants in their countries as the "far right," when that's actually the majority position now across Europe.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Nope. Not even close, and completely skips over the reams of pages on the topic.