GSPfan wrote: » Strange question for everyone.... If Star Trek Enterprise had a more normal intro in the same vein as TOS, TNG, DS9, Voyager do you think it would have been received better by fans at the time? I ask because I remember watching it and at the time I’d cringe a little at that intro music at the start of every episode. It blunted my excitement slightly. I just wonder if Enterprise had of started with a theme tune like that of Quantum Leap would we have all remembered it a bit more fondly.
breezy1985 wrote: » Calling it Enterprise really annoyed me and Bakula was a bit too squeaky clean. A better actor like Stewart, Brooks or Isaac's might have carried the show but the general consensus seems to be that people were just a bit worn out with Bermans Star Trek
ReginaldSmythV wrote: » It’s my favourite (the slower one from 1 and 2 anyway) and I think it suits the era and idea of the show, but yeah I get what you mean. Seems to be heavily criticised.
AMKC wrote: » Agreed it was a much better tune in season 1 and 2 than what they done to it in season 3 and 4 and ruining it like that was just disgraceful. I like singing it.
odyssey06 wrote: » It's a nice tune but it's not Trek... I was a bit more hostile towards it until I saw Russell Watson doing a random interview on TV and he came across as a sound bloke.
GSPfan wrote: » If Star Trek Enterprise had a more normal intro in the same vein as TOS, TNG, DS9, Voyager do you think it would have been received better by fans at the time?
AMKC wrote: » You might have liked the original theme that was intended for it then,https://youtu.be/JtWT-H3XQGI
Cookie_Monster wrote: » let me just ruin this for you... cant unwatch it, cant watch it and not be phased every intro: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUiDc6pOfxw
Deleted User wrote: » I find your lack of Faith (of the Hert) disturbing
pixelburp wrote: » IIRC Lost was the show that popularised the short intro. Boom, title card, let's do it. As you say Netflix and HBO brought them back but as legitimate pieces of art and creativity than the hokey cast montages of previous eras (though there's a soft spot for the McGuyver intros of this world). Critically, you can only "skip intro" after the first episode of shows on Netflix and Amazon I think? So especially with those more elaborate intros, it's good to watch them once but not every time either. Hmmm might spin up a thread in the TV forum of great TV intros cos they can just look so good. It's kinda the same with films too TBH. Fashions that come in waves. Watch any old black and white flick and you gotta be ready for 5 minutes of credits _at the start_ (fun slightly related fact, Night of the Living Dead is a public domain film because someone forgot to put the copyright symbol in the title card. Back then in the 60s, that was legally binding, and so it stuck, the film now a non-copyright work. Whoops!)
GSPfan wrote: » To be honest I’m a fan of the minimum intro on some shows. There was a time there about 10+ years ago where intros became very short. Examples I can think of are Lost, Heroes, Stargate Universe. Then I think Netflix lead the way in bringing back the long intro and turned it into an art form. One of the best ones is Daredevil. That tune is still my ringtone on my phone. And of course Game of Thrones was an absolute masterpiece. I’m loving the intro to The Expanse. Even though I’m binge watching episodes I don’t skip the intro. I hate Discovery’s intro. Didn’t really like Enterprises.
breezy1985 wrote: » Wasn't it Star Wars that was the first big movie to not have opening credits. Got George Lucas kicked out of some big film makers guild
AMKC wrote: » Me I like good intros to films and at T.V series. It shows a lack of imagination when they do not have any. As much as I do not like Disoverys one at least they had some imagination just not in the right style.
Cookie_Monster wrote: » whatever about in the past, intros are a bit redundant in an era where people binge watch multiple episodes back to back. I do like that netflix's option to skip intro on most series now
pixelburp wrote: » So just saw a mention in passing about Kate Mulgrew's involvement in the animated Academy show, and given the success of Lower Decks ... I wonder. Is Trek going to slowly pivot towards being a predominantly animated show? Between CoVid causing real problems to location shoots, the greater expense of live-action TV anyway - and just the overall better reception of the animated shows - part of me's theorising that CBS / Paramount might start to slowly kill off its live-action projects in favour of cartoons. Or, probably not, but kinda got me thinking all the same.
ReginaldSmythV wrote: » I hope not. As bad as Discovery and Picard have been, I have zero interest in their place being taken by jokey animates shows. Lower Decks is atrocious.
breezy1985 wrote: » Lower Decks was to tap into the adult cartoon scene which is pretty strong and Academy is a nickelodeon show for younger people so not unusual. There is more DIS, Picard to come plus Strange New Worlds and Section 31 so live action doesn't look to be going anywhere
pixelburp wrote: » Has either section 31 or Strange New World's even started production yet though? Certainly the former seemed still in a weird maybe state of limbo. And presumably Picard has a much more limited shelf life in any case for more obvious, real world reasons...
ReginaldSmythV wrote: » I hope not. As bad as Discovery and Picard have been, I have zero interest in their place being taken by jokey animated shows. Lower Decks is atrocious.
ilovesmybrick wrote: » I have to say, Lower Decks was the best of the three this year. Picard follows after with the same rating as maybe season three TNG, Disco might be rated somehwhere around first season TNG, at a stretch.
breezy1985 wrote: » All stopped for Covid but they are happening barring a tragedy with Picard
ReginaldSmythV wrote: » I wouldn’t even have a spoofy cartoon in the same comparison as the proper shows. For me there were only two Star Trek series the past year, even if they were bad.
ilovesmybrick wrote: » Each to their own. I was initially incredibly dubious of the concept of Lower Decks, but for me it got the right balance of reverance to the source material, while pulling the piss out of some of the nonsense. I was engaged with Picard because of Picard as a character, I engaged with Lower Decks because I felt they took the obvious parts of Trek that we can pull the piss out off and made a great homage to it, while also developing characters in a way that I felt works in the universe. How the Barclay's can succeed in a world. all about high achievers. I can't say I engaged with Discovery in the same manner.