Deleted User wrote: » Great to see that we’re flattening the curve. https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-40212998.html
smurgen wrote: » It doesn't specify. It says the flight was 7.5 hours long and that it happened during the summer. I think NY is 7.15 and Boston is 7.5. Who knows.
Deleted User wrote: » Uk bringing in forced quaratineshttps://mobile.twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1353097636505657345 Why cant we do this....instead of just letting government say,its too much hassle and blindly accepting it
[Deleted User] wrote: » I wish posters would actually read the contents of the links they are posting. It’s being discussed. No final decision made.
IAMAMORON wrote: » It is only a cabinet proposal and highly unlikely to become a reality. They would run out of Hotel rooms after about 2-3 hours. Papers have a habit of never refusing ink.
smurgen wrote: » 13k hotel rooms in dublin as of 2018. How many people do you think are flying in currently?
Bishop of hope wrote: » Be a win win for the hoteliers too, vested interests there might push on that one. Just getting back to Francie's earlier posts. Good for the economy.
Deleted User wrote: » The telegraph is the paper for the british conservative party,same the irish times is for ffg If they have it,the decision is made,and only remains to be formally approved.....theres a reason its known as the torygraph
[Deleted User] wrote: » So, you agree that no decision has been made and your joyful announcement is somewhat premature?
smurgen wrote: » Hi Maryanne would ya mind answering my question to you at 11.46? You seem to have skipped it.
Deleted User wrote: » Firstly, the question was in the middle of a Twitter drop, which I ignore as you rarely include a comment or opinion in these. Secondly, the data is from summer 2020. At least 6 months old.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Firstly, the question was in the middle of a Twitter drop, which I ignore as you rarely include a comment or opinion in these. Secondly, the data is from summer 2020. At least 6 months old.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » Well said Mary, nice to know some of us can see through those tactics.
blanch152 wrote: » Trumpian statement disguised as a question gets labelled with fake news. Stop the steal, Mary-Lou is the real Taoiseach.
smurgen wrote: » What tactics? Using scientific data to back up my opinion that a policy change urgently needed and should have happened last May? As someone who writes alot of fiction with no support in the wee hours about political parties I can see how actual data is offensive to you. I suppose it's hard to look up relevant links at 6 am when you're frothing at the mouth Brendi!
smurgen wrote: » What does a full flight matter? Here's an example of what can and is happening. Are you okay with this?https://twitter.com/Orla_Hegarty/status/1353292150486822919?s=19
blanch152 wrote: » Well, that depends. That twitter link doesn't really add anything to the sum of knowledge out there, other than allowing people to scaremonger, whinge and complain. There were probably around 500,000 visitors to Ireland during the summer, by land, sea and air. 59 cases is around 12 per 100,000. If that is all there were, what is the problem? As I keep saying, the only way to solve this, without completely crippling the economy, is to adopt a two-island approach based on the common travel area. Closing the border isn't politically acceptable to good republicans who will ignore it anyway, and an all-island approach will cause too much damage as the food shortages on the shelves from Brexit demonstrate.
blanch152 wrote: » Well, that depends. That twitter link doesn't really add anything to the sum of knowledge out there, other than allowing people to scaremonger, whinge and complain. There were probably around 500,000 visitors to Ireland during the summer, by land, sea and air. 59 cases is around 12 per 100,000. If that is all there were, what is the problem?As I keep saying, the only way to solve this, without completely crippling the economy, is to adopt a two-island approach based on the common travel area. Closing the border isn't politically acceptable to good republicans who will ignore it anyway, and an all-island approach will cause too much damage as the food shortages on the shelves from Brexit demonstrate.
McMurphy wrote: » You haven't "kept saying that" Just the other day you introduced a complete fabricated lie about GDPR and how "you would not trust the nasty Brits with your personal data". You've abandoned that now I see. Like will you literally post any auld shyte at all, just to be contrarian?
FrancieBrady wrote: » And you have been asked, what has the government done about a two island approach...nothing, they are ignoring, for whatever reason, contact from their northern counterparts and have done nothing about contacting the British. Unless you can show us something.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Next question is, how does it protect us from the UK? Hair brained scheme if you ask me.
blanch152 wrote: » https://www.rte.ie/news/2021/0122/1191497-taoiseach-covid-latest/ "Speaking to RTÉ at Government Buildings, he said a "two-island approach" is being pursued, but there are "lots of issues around implementation and delivery"." "Mr Martin said discussions have been taking place between the Ministers for Health and Transport and their UK counterparts, but they are at an "exploratory" stage." Oh ye of little faith.
Deleted User wrote: » Why is this only starting now,11 months after the 1st confirmed case here...will it be sorted for monday?
FrancieBrady wrote: » It hasn't started, they are 'exploring' it. Sitting around in layman's termes while Covid's increasing variants rip through us.
[Deleted User] wrote: » it took 9 months to bring in airport testing....why is everything so slow here