nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Northern Ireland- a failure 99 years on?

[Deleted User]

Is there another way of looking at it?
It’s still very, very divided, and actually seems to be getting more polarized over the last five years. It’s economy is woeful, very heavily dependent on the public sector.
Unionists are making plans to celebrate its centenary, but there seems to be very little to be happy with, certainly far less than the Republic or the rest of the UK.
No point in arguing about a border poll on this thread, but is there any possible way of looking at NI as a social, political and economic failure?

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Fann Linn

tom1ie wrote: »

so how long would you be willing to carry an EXTRA 5 billion worth of debt to keep NI afloat?

How many billions did we spend to keep a few banks afloat. 5 billion is peanuts in the grand scheme of things.

[Deleted User]

tom1ie wrote: »

how realistic do you think that is?

VERY. The least they could do. Besides they'd be saving £5b per year.

[Deleted User]

tom1ie wrote: »

so how long would you be willing to carry an EXTRA 5 billion worth of debt to keep NI afloat?

I see it as an investment. A bit like investing in a new business at ground zero. And if you see my subsequent point it potentially becomes self funding.

tom1ie

Deleted User wrote: »

Just thinking... We should ask the UK to take on NI's proportion of National Debt rather than transfer it to the UI (the UK's debt is massive). That way the new Country (Ireland's debt) reduces to approx:-

ROI National Debt reduces to approx 5/7ths of existing debt per person of UI. That's the least the rUK can do for its former citizens.

how realistic do you think that is?

tom1ie

Deleted User wrote: »

The ROI was at full capacity employment wise pre pandemic. NI has an educated workforce, but a lot of them bugger off to GB because there isn't enough private sector work. They could be kept in employment locally (in time) in a UI.

As to why the UK hasn't bothered with the most peripheral part of their country, you might do best directing that question by writing to.

Mr Boris Johnson,
10 Downing Street
London
UK

so how long would you be willing to carry an EXTRA 5 billion worth of debt to keep NI afloat?

Natterjack from Kerry

blanch152 wrote: »

A border poll held before it is clear that it is likely that it will be passed, is by definition divisive, as it breaches the terms of the GFA.

Then it wont happen. The discussion is pointless.

BonnieSituation

downcow wrote: »

This is one of the greatest misunderstandings I hear from nationalists regularly.
I am very sensitive to the connotations of how you say Londonderry. My dad who was a unionist from Donegal who lived a while in Derry was the only unionist I knew who defaulted to ‘derry’. I have to check myself not to say Londonderry in most company as the natural for me to say is londonderry. I will usually say they maiden city’ or the ‘north west’ to try not to offend.
I was struck recently when I was with strangers and had reason to say the name of that city. I had ducked it by saying north west, and my daughter, who has almost exclusively nationalist friends and Challenges anyone who says anything negative about Ireland or Irish, automatically piped in and said Londonderry (just to be more specific). I pointed out to her afterwards that those were Catholics we were speaking to and I was surprised at her, of all people, saying Londonderry. She was completely unaware that she had even said it till I pointed it out and we had a laugh about me being the moderate.

So really you should drop that nonsense that every time a prod says Londonderry that they are having a go. I would equate it to nationalists saying ‘The North’ I don’t think, most of the time ‘The North’ is said for reaction either. Although I would know many unionists that do think,like you ,that ‘The North’ is said only to wind up prods

You are suspicious guys lol

Whataboutery, projection and things that didn't happen for $1000

[Deleted User]

Just thinking... We should ask the UK to take on NI's proportion of National Debt rather than transfer it to the UI (the UK's debt is massive). That way the new Country (Ireland's debt) reduces to approx:-

ROI National Debt reduces to approx 5/7ths of existing debt per person of UI. That's the least the rUK can do for its former citizens.

BonnieSituation

blanch152 wrote: »

A border poll held before it is clear that it is likely that it will be passed, is by definition divisive, as it breaches the terms of the GFA.

Right.

So subscribe to the idea of it "appearing likely" that it will pass as the measure of the criteria of it being called?

Does that also preclude us from discussing it at all until then as well?

Do you think that Partitionists and belligerent Unionists should have a veto on all aspects of the discussion so that they don't feel uncomfortable?

BonnieSituation

blanch152 wrote: »

This is what you said, two referenda, one wording.

That is not what the above post says.

I know what I wrote. Thanks for the reminder.

Have you anything substantive to ask or shall we do this little dance?

[Deleted User]

tom1ie wrote: »

That's very optimistic!
What resources or private jobs can be put in place/ created that haven't been by the uk government, and if we can put these resources in place in the North why wouldn't we create those jobs in the south?

The ROI was at full capacity employment wise pre pandemic. NI has an educated workforce, but a lot of them bugger off to GB because there isn't enough private sector work. They could be kept in employment locally (in time) in a UI.

As to why the UK hasn't bothered with the most peripheral part of their country, you might do best directing that question by writing to.

Mr Boris Johnson,
10 Downing Street
London
UK

tom1ie

Deleted User wrote: »

Northern Ireland isn't run properly. A blind man could see this. It used to be a powerhouse of Ireland and contributed to UK. There has also been a serious brain drain. That needs to be reversed, and opportunities will do this, mostly benefiting PLU community.

In the short term it would be a drain on resources. But, it can help the Island of Ireland to prosper as a whole. Economy of scale for one.

So, yes, it would not be without some pain, but ultimately it will be the economic benefit of everyone on this island if we pooled together.

That's very optimistic!
What resources or private jobs can be put in place/ created that haven't been by the uk government, and if we can put these resources in place in the North why wouldn't we create those jobs in the south?

[Deleted User]

Capt'n Midnight wrote: »

But little englanders can be still be proud of England. Make no mistake English Nationalism is likely to be the driving force behind Scottish Independence and Irish unification.

It could be argued that they have already done enough with Brexit, just needing time for that to fully sink in.

Of course if they refuse to give Scotland another referendum that will just help support nationalism. No democratic country, the mother of parliament no less, could hold out against granting another referendum against popular opinion indefinitely.

Capt'n Midnight

Deleted User wrote: »

That has almost certainly to do with the loss of pride at their country being geographically diminished rather than a love for NI in itself. Remember Britannia rules the waves and all that guff. They'd hate to see that last of their empire dwindle away.

Gibraltar has joined Schengen and Spain is enforcing the rules including immigration at the airport.

60% of revenue in the Falklands is derived from seafood exports to the EU. Joining Mercosur, the South American Trading Block, could be the quickest and easiest way to get around tariffs. Remnants of empire are being left to wither on the vine. Countries in the EU can deflect allegations of loose tax rules or years to come by directing them at UK protectorates. And in fairness those protectorates do account for a third of the dodgy money and much of the rest is US money in the US Virgin Islands.

The other strand was Empire 2.0 but that died a death when exports didn't go up when Sterling went down.

And we all know that Labour if they get in again will do even less for The Empire than Tories.

But little englanders can be still be proud of England. Make no mistake English Nationalism is likely to be the driving force behind Scottish Independence and Irish unification.

[Deleted User]

tom1ie wrote: »

anyone care to comment? This is a fairly important point.

Northern Ireland isn't run properly. A blind man could see this. It used to be a powerhouse of Ireland and contributed to UK. There has also been a serious brain drain. That needs to be reversed, and opportunities will do this, mostly benefiting PLU community.

In the short term it would be a drain on resources. But, it can help the Island of Ireland to prosper as a whole. Economy of scale for one.

So, yes, it would not be without some pain, but ultimately it will be the economic benefit of everyone on this island if we pooled together.

tom1ie

tom1ie wrote: »

Folks, from an economic point of view would a United Ireland make sense?
The last I heard was that NI requires 5billion (pounds?) to keep it going every year.
How can the republic add that to its yearly balance sheet without either raising taxes or cutting services?

anyone care to comment? This is a fairly important point.

[Deleted User]

Natterjack from Kerry wrote: »

Westminster does not subsidise Northern Ireland. Every country has transfers of wealth between different areas, with centres of high wealth and productivity, shouldering a greater part of the national bill than others. The idea of NI being a region 'supported' is nonsense. It is an integral part of the UK. The UK supports itself in it entirety.

The workings of the Barnett formula makes it all the more glaring when it comes to UK transfers/subsidies, whichever you like. The Unionists are the ones most likely to be heard talking about this subvention.

Natterjack from Kerry

Capt'n Midnight wrote: »

If Scotland gets independence then there is no justification for Westminster to continue to subsidise NI. And that issue will come front and centre if Scotland leave.

Westminster does not subsidise Northern Ireland. Every country has transfers of wealth between different areas, with centres of high wealth and productivity, shouldering a greater part of the national bill than others. The idea of NI being a region 'supported' is nonsense. It is an integral part of the UK. The UK supports itself in it entirety.

[Deleted User]

downcow wrote: »

I saw another bit of that poll that someone posted elsewhere which you didn’t have room for Francie. I was honestly surprised that over 50% more English people would be upset at losing NI from the UK than would be pleased to lose NI.
Fair play to them because we are expensive to keep.
I wonder would there be 50% more southerners pleased to get NI than there would be upset if they didn’t get us. What do you think?

That has almost certainly to do with the loss of pride at their country being geographically diminished rather than a love for NI in itself. Remember Britannia rules the waves and all that guff. They'd hate to see that last of their empire dwindle away.

jm08

downcow wrote: »

I saw another bit of that poll that someone posted elsewhere which you didn’t have room for Francie. I was honestly surprised that over 50% more English people would be upset at losing NI from the UK than would be pleased to lose NI.
Fair play to them because we are expensive to keep.
I wonder would there be 50% more southerners pleased to get NI than there would be upset if they didn’t get us. What do you think?

Most English people were not bothered. Most were not bothered in Scotland either.

Attitudes to Irish reunification
England voters:
Pleased 20%
Not bothered: 37%
Upset: 31%

Scotland voters:
Pleased 29%
Not bothered 42%
Upset: 21%

https://twitter.com/thesundaytimes/status/1353044013776035840/photo/1

Capt'n Midnight

The only stable alternative to reunification would be a financially viable NI that works for everyone.

If Scotland gets independence then there is no justification for Westminster to continue to subsidise NI. And that issue will come front and centre if Scotland leave.

Since Brexit Gibraltar has joined Schengen, the Falklands the Channel Islands and other dependencies have been hit with tariffs on seafood exports to the EU. Aruba's lobsters are OK because of a US-EU deal on lobsters, but the UK wasn't involved. The British Virgin Islands , Guernsey and Jersey are now on the EU's tax evasion radar. The pattern here is that England isn't looking out for the other nations or islands. You could even include Cornwall in that given dearth of EU fund replacement or how the shellfish and other fisheries down there lost out.

FrancieBrady

Natterjack from Kerry wrote: »

Thats quite the FrancieBrady tredemark non-answer there. Its words. Broadly grammatically correct. But making no sense what so ever.

You ignore the fact that the poster downcow has made no comment on the polls I posted but found something he can gloat about.

I wouldn't spend too much thinking about how the British feel about losing NI, because that could mean they are simply upset about the Union breaking up or have a genuine love for NI itself..I don't know and care much tbh.

What answer was I supposed to give?

Natterjack from Kerry

FrancieBrady wrote: »

I'd be upset if I lost my wallet but I'd get over quick enough.

Thats quite the FrancieBrady tredemark non-answer there. Its words. Broadly grammatically correct. But making no sense what so ever.

FrancieBrady

downcow wrote: »

I saw another bit of that poll that someone posted elsewhere which you didn’t have room for Francie. I was honestly surprised that over 50% more English people would be upset at losing NI from the UK than would be pleased to lose NI.
Fair play to them because we are expensive to keep.
I wonder would there be 50% more southerners pleased to get NI than there would be upset if they didn’t get us. What do you think?

I'd be upset if I lost my wallet but I'd get over quick enough.

downcow

FrancieBrady wrote: »

State Of The Union poll in Sunday Times.

All to play for.

I saw another bit of that poll that someone posted elsewhere which you didn’t have room for Francie. I was honestly surprised that over 50% more English people would be upset at losing NI from the UK than would be pleased to lose NI.
Fair play to them because we are expensive to keep.
I wonder would there be 50% more southerners pleased to get NI than there would be upset if they didn’t get us. What do you think?

downcow

Hellokitty1212 wrote: »

I tend to say “the North” in conversation and “the Six Counties” in writing.

Neither to take the piss, just words.

Thanks. Yes neither annoy me but I know they wind up many unionists because they jump to Bonnies position of assuming you have put thought into it and are trying to make a political point to wind them up.

downcow

Hellokitty1212 wrote: »

I tend to say “the North” in conversation and “the Six Counties” in writing.

Neither to take the piss, just words.

Hellokitty1212

downcow wrote: »

This is one of the greatest misunderstandings I hear from nationalists regularly.
I am very sensitive to the connotations of how you say Londonderry. My dad who was a unionist from Donegal who lived a while in Derry was the only unionist I knew who defaulted to ‘derry’. I have to check myself not to say Londonderry in most company as the natural for me to say is londonderry. I will usually say they maiden city’ or the ‘north west’ to try not to offend.
I was struck recently when I was with strangers and had reason to say the name of that city. I had ducked it by saying north west, and my daughter, who has almost exclusively nationalist friends and Challenges anyone who says anything negative about Ireland or Irish, automatically piped in and said Londonderry (just to be more specific). I pointed out to her afterwards that those were Catholics we were speaking to and I was surprised at her, of all people, saying Londonderry. She was completely unaware that she had even said it till I pointed it out and we had a laugh about me being the moderate.

So really you should drop that nonsense that every time a prod says Londonderry that they are having a go. I would equate it to nationalists saying ‘The North’ I don’t think, most of the time ‘The North’ is said for reaction either. Although I would know many unionists that do think,like you ,that ‘The North’ is said only to wind up prods

You are suspicious guys lol

I tend to say “the North” in conversation and “the Six Counties” in writing.

Neither to take the piss, just words.

downcow

BonnieSituation wrote: »

So you say, I'm going to the UK when you're heading to one of Fermanagh, Armagh, Tyrone, Derry, Antrim or Down?

Cos it's obviously nonsense.

It's like all this Unionists never say Londonderry... Unless of course a camera is on them or they're on the phone to Nolan. Catch yourself on.

This is one of the greatest misunderstandings I hear from nationalists regularly.
I am very sensitive to the connotations of how you say Londonderry. My dad who was a unionist from Donegal who lived a while in Derry was the only unionist I knew who defaulted to ‘derry’. I have to check myself not to say Londonderry in most company as the natural for me to say is londonderry. I will usually say they maiden city’ or the ‘north west’ to try not to offend.
I was struck recently when I was with strangers and had reason to say the name of that city. I had ducked it by saying north west, and my daughter, who has almost exclusively nationalist friends and Challenges anyone who says anything negative about Ireland or Irish, automatically piped in and said Londonderry (just to be more specific). I pointed out to her afterwards that those were Catholics we were speaking to and I was surprised at her, of all people, saying Londonderry. She was completely unaware that she had even said it till I pointed it out and we had a laugh about me being the moderate.

So really you should drop that nonsense that every time a prod says Londonderry that they are having a go. I would equate it to nationalists saying ‘The North’ I don’t think, most of the time ‘The North’ is said for reaction either. Although I would know many unionists that do think,like you ,that ‘The North’ is said only to wind up prods

You are suspicious guys lol

tom1ie

Folks, from an economic point of view would a United Ireland make sense?
The last I heard was that NI requires 5billion (pounds?) to keep it going every year.
How can the republic add that to its yearly balance sheet without either raising taxes or cutting services?