schmittel wrote: » Whether they are fantasy or not, they might be gaining traction - below is a January 2018 opinion poll based on housing tenure. Poll taken in last days of Gerry Adam's SF leadership, so presumably they are more voter friendly now: <SNIP> No wonder FF/FG keen to do whatever it takes to get more people owning houses, even if it means buying 30% of it for them!
Hubertj wrote: » Of course such policies gain traction. It’s easy to promise the sun moon and stars especially when you see the balls up that has been made of it. Look at other headlines relating to the property market recently - “prices” increasing 6%-7%.... people go mad about it..... it’s only people who look past the headline realise it’s just asking prices etc. So you get SF rolling out a lad that can actually speak properly and doesn’t have a criminal background (that we know of). He promises cheap and/or free houses for all..... of course people pay attention. But he’s lying..... just like people saying shared equity and other policies won’t increase prices.
schmittel wrote: » People on big money are a lot more price sensitive than most realise. I've made this point a few times against the sure we have plenty of high earners in MNCs to keep the show on the road logic.
bluelamp wrote: » This. The high earning / high wealth individuals didn't generally get there by making poor financial choices. I'd imagine they would be the last people to be ripped off.
BredonWimsey wrote: » on the other hand - they may have so much money they dont know what to do with it or its family money so they have no attachment to it. Its a bit more nuanced i think. older people also with alot of money are swindled all the time. Also have you heard of Catfishing. Yup its a thing. so happens across the board regardless of bracket. anyway i need to go and count my millions - i'll be right back.
schmittel wrote: » If you've got so much money you don't know what to do with it, I can guarantee you're not buying 180 sq m semi d's in Booterstown!
schmittel wrote: » People on big money are a lot more price sensitive than most realise. I've made this point a few times against the sure we have plenty of high earners in MNCs to keep the show on the road logic. FTBs at the lower end of the market with 20% deposit and HTB and whatever shared equity etc are more sensitive to the amount they can borrow rather than the purchase price. They calculate the max they can borrow as a multiple of salary under the CBI rules and work backwards, then calculating the deposit they need for 20% and get saving. If that works out at buying power of 350k they start looking at properties to bid up to 350k on. Purchase price sensitivity is out the window, they want to buy whatever they can for 350k, get on the ladder, stop paying the rent, sure the mortgage is cheaper. However if you look at people paying 8/900k+ the rational is different. Because affordability is less of an issue, the pressure of getting out from under the landlord etc is not there, they will be much more value orientated in what they can get for their money. They are far more likely to say - Hang on, this is the guts of 1m for 180sq m semi d with a pokey back garden, do I really need to be in this location, surely I can do better than that for my budget? DataDude and friends a case in point.
PokeHerKing wrote: » To sum up what you've said there is more money equals more options. Hardly a revelation.
schmittel wrote: » You'd be surprised how many posters on here don't get it.
DataDude wrote: » Nail on the head. At risk of making myself completely identifiable to my friends who follow this forum: As well as my professional circle of very high earners, we have another circle of friends on my partner's side who would have a more typical income profile. In my circle, there are two home owners out of 8/9 individuals. In my partners circle we are the only ones who who are not. They fit precisely into your description above and often ask us "so, when do you think you'll be able to buy". I'd usually deflect not wanting to cast any negative sentiment on their recent purchase, but when pushed I might say something like "oh well we're just not sure now is the right time, Dublin seemed to hit peak affordability in late 2018 and I guess I have some concerns about where the economy goes from here and particularly any tax hikes coming down the road" I may as well be speaking German with the looks I get. Not that our approach is "better" (in fact if things keep on going this way, perhaps we are the fools) but for them it has always been a case of "I need to save X amount, I immediately run to the bank and take as big a mortgage as I possibly can and buy whatever that will get me". The idea that people who can buy, don't and are happy to wait and see is completely foreign to them. The luxury of being able to buy is directly correlated with not feeling the need to buy. And to add to that, I often read on various property forums comments like "ah well if you can afford to pay €1m you won't mind paying €1.2m, money is not an issue". From all my experiences, that is complete nonsense.
DataDude wrote: I may as well be speaking German with the looks I get. Not that our approach is "better" (in fact if things keep on going this way, perhaps we are the fools) but for them it has always been a case of "I need to save X amount, I immediately run to the bank and take as big a mortgage as I possibly can and buy whatever that will get me". The idea that people who can buy, don't and are happy to wait and see is completely foreign to them.
Villa05 wrote: » Media influence, Control supply Push up rents/prices Pressure purchase Rinse Repeat untill the bubble pops
schmittel wrote: » Why do you think it is "surprisingly low"? What reason would you make you expect it might be higher?
DataDude wrote: » Nail on the head. At risk of making myself completely identifiable to my friends who follow this forum: As well as my professional circle of very high earners, we have another circle of friends on my partner's side who would have a more typical income profile. In my circle, there are two home owners out of 8/9 individuals. In my partners circle we are the only ones who who are not. They fit precisely into your description above and often ask us "so, when do you think you'll be able to buy". I'd usually deflect not wanting to cast any negative sentiment on their recent purchase, but when pushed I might say something like "oh well we're just not sure now is the right time, Dublin seemed to hit peak affordability in late 2018 and I guess I have some concerns about where the economy goes from here and particularly any tax hikes coming down the road" I may as well be speaking German with the looks I get. Not that our approach is "better" (in fact if things keep on going this way, perhaps we are the fools) but for them it has always been a case of "I need to save X amount, I immediately run to the bank and take as big a mortgage as I possibly can and buy whatever that will get me". The idea that people who can buy, don't and are happy to wait and see is completely foreign to them.The luxury of being able to buy is directly correlated with not feeling the need to buy. And to add to that, I often read on various property forums comments like "ah well if you can afford to pay €1m you won't mind paying €1.2m, money is not an issue". From all my experiences, that is complete nonsense.
Marius34 wrote: » There are hardly any of the reports stating that Dublin has high vacancy rate, where there are reports that states in opposite. Here is official report from European Commission: "Mobilising the stock of vacant housing is unlikely to alleviate the housing supply shortage. According to GeoDirectory (9) data, in the second quarter of 2019, the average vacancy rate in Ireland was relatively low, at 4.8%, with rates ranging from 1.2% in Dublin to 15.2% in Leitrim. The vacancy rate was low where demand for housing was most acute, such as in the greater Dublin area (10) , while high vacancy rates were registered in rural counties with low housing demand. The reutilisation of long-term vacant properties in counties such as Cork or Galway (with vacancy rates of respectively 4.1% and 6.6%), where housing demand is increasing, may mitigate the supply shortage. However, it is unlikely to alleviate the supply shortage in the greater Dublin area"https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/economy-finance/eb061_en.pdf
schmittel wrote: » Do you think 1.3% is surprisingly low?
MacronvFrugals wrote: » Julien Mercile from UCD's Geary institute researches the incestuous relationship between Ireland's media and the property industry He also spoke at lengths to the Public Accounts Committee a few years backThe Political Economy and Media Coverage of the European Economic Crisis : The Case of Irelandhttps://www.bookdepository.com/Political-Economy-Media-Coverage-European-Economic-Crisis-Julien-Mercille/9780415721097?ref=grid-view&qid=1611506361588&sr=1-2
BredonWimsey wrote: » Look at this - them trying to deter people from buying houses at less than market value - doesnt fit the agenda does it.https://www.irishtimes.com/business/personal-finance/buying-mum-s-house-at-less-than-market-value-could-cause-tax-headaches-1.4466596
Pelezico wrote: » Mother can sell at market price and gift daughter 50k.
PokeHerKing wrote: » Theres plenty of people on varying salary points unwilling to buy at certain price points. You and the other poster appear to be saying the only people who are aware or interested in market value are high earners which is complete ballix IMHO and sounds pretty elitist. But it also doesn't take a genius to know the more money you have the more options there are available to you and if you don't fear being priced out then you can afford to wait. Again nothing clairvoyant to that kind of reasoning, its fairly obvious to most people with any semblance of cop-on.
The country’s main retail banks may be precluded from participating in the government’s proposed €75 million shared equity housing scheme under the Central Bank of Ireland’s existing mortgage rules, the Business Post has learned.
BredonWimsey wrote: Look at this - them trying to deter people from buying houses at less than market value - doesnt fit the agenda does it.
Villa05 wrote: » So a family go out of their way to help house disadvantaged family members. The state itself would have an obligation to help house these people. The state then places multiple obstacles, penalties and taxes that prevent Famiy members from helping each other where the state has abysmally failed. The state then gives tax breaks long term leases, anti competitive monopolistic practices to the wealthiest institutions to buy up property and promote inflation in prices and rents Mod's, Hubertj and anyone else This is not a conspiracy theory. This is Fact
Villa05 wrote: » Interesting, I would have thought that an exodus from Dublin would be led and dominated by people priced out of the market. When you have the highest earners doing it we could have a very interesting few years ahead of us.
MacronvFrugals wrote: » Mortgage rules raise doubts over shared equity housing scheme https://www.businesspost.ie/financial-services/mortgage-rules-raise-doubts-over-shared-equity-housing-scheme-33bd7418 Apologies if this was posted last week
Zenify wrote: » Sure I even believe their are paid posters here by some of the property interests. How crazy is that....? Some of the pro property posters here must honestly spend hours each day on here. Just look at some of the names and how often they post. That's how skeptical you can become.
