dmigsy wrote: » I've had the Alienware 38 in my cart for the last couple of days. Couple of things that are stopping me pulling the trigger: 1) Whether there's that much of a benefit over the budget 34" 3440x1440 monitor 100hz (Crossover 34U100) I have already. Anyone made a similar move? Thoughts? 2) OLED FOMO. The OLED TVs that like the LG 48 CX look amazing and if a sub-40" inch once came out I'd want that instead. None seem imminent though Think I might sit on it for a while.
K.O.Kiki wrote: » 32" OLED are coming.https://m.hexus.net/tech/news/monitors/147261-lg-intros-32-inch-uhd-ultrafine-32ep950-oled-monitor/
Squidgy Black wrote: » Seeing all the alienwares has me mighty tempted to upgrade from my Samsung SJ55W..... Must resist.....
Icyseanfitz wrote: » is there a go to 1440p UW high refresh monitor in and around the 500 range?
Dcully wrote: » I would appreciate that thanks, it looks the pick of the bunch for 1440p with the exception of the alienware AW2721D but thats a lot more expensive.
deceit wrote: » IIYAMA G-MASTER GB3461WQSU-B1 RED EAGLE is a 3440x1440 144hz ips monitor which is around that price with the only limit really being its not curved. I was very tempted by this one.Its about 465 over here in Germany so should get in Ireland for around 500.
Icyseanfitz wrote: » Interesting, see that they also have the GB3466WQSU-B1 which is curved but is a VA panel.
deceit wrote: » I've tried a few VA panels and I have to admit they wouldn't be for me, I'd only ever pick Ips or TN.
K.O.Kiki wrote: » My friend reminded me of the oldest trick in the book: Get a sales rep & ask for a discount. Got it for 1142 EUR :cool:
dmigsy wrote: » Just ordered the Alienware 38. For 1133 :cool::cool:
BloodBath wrote: » Isn't the Samsung G9 a lot better than that both in specs and price.
deceit wrote: » One word VA. I tried it in store and even though its better than most VA panels it still have the wierd blurry issue that wrecks havok with my eyes.
Lumen wrote: » The G9 has a 1000R curve. For me that makes it repulsive. For comparison the Alienware 34 has a 1900R curve.
BloodBath wrote: » Well that's a good enough reason. Samsung were stupid putting it at 240hz default profile though. A lot of manufacturers are overly aggressive with their target refresh rates or overdrive settings and it hurts the picture quality in motion. Like Deceit was put off it after viewing it in store because at 240hz it looks bad. If it had been at 200hz, which is still overkill and better than 99% of other monitors, you wouldn't have seen any inverse ghosting and might have bought it.
Lu Tze wrote: » Would the previous 120hz model not be a good option?