Calahonda52 wrote: » This will only feed back into the price of panels going up, so no benefit to Joe and Mary Domestic. This proposed system, like all the grant schemes here are fundamentally skewed to benefit the supplier of the hardware. Just look at how profitable Ki**span got from insulation and solar thermal grants through lobbying of, initially FF Government, making millionaires of a few of the elite.
KCross wrote: » It’s not a grant scheme though. We already have a grant scheme with inflated prices as you suggest. Hopefully they ditch that.
KCross wrote: » The assessment is that you wouldn’t have an ROI then which means you won’t have the wide scale uptake
unkel wrote: » LOL, 95% of the people wouldn't be able to do a proper ROI calculation either way. The wholesale rate of the moment is good enough for me. And prices of PV hardware are so low that we don't need any stupid subsidies on those either The payback time will be very quick if you buy at good prices and install DIY. Even if you get the job done by an installer, the ROI will be much better than any money in a savings account Unkel's proposal: zero subsidies, FIT unlimited quantity at wholesale rate of the moment only (could be negative), no restrictions on who can fit where (houses, offices, farms) any age of the building. Zero government / ESB involvement, just a diktat to the utility providers Either that or net metering...
unkel wrote: » Any idea of the split in value per kWh exported between these two payments?
cruisey1987 wrote: » To be fair, you're not exactly an average electricity consumer as I recall I'm in a similar boat, all my heating, cooking and transportation is electric. Currently we're consuming 8,500kWh per year, and if the wife gets an EV or PHEV it'll move to over 10,000kWh I'd absolutely be intending to install the biggest PV array I can. The irony is that this is the way many houses will go as we switch to EVs and new build houses and retrofits almost all use heat pumps now. With all the focus on indoor air quality, I suspect a lot of people will move to electric cooking as well So this concept of the 'average' PV system being 3kWp is going to be out of date very quickly IMO
unkel wrote: » It's sad really. Almost 100 years ago the ESB were a very progressive organisation with a visionary leader. Look at them now.
slave1 wrote: » LOL, wish I was at the 10MW level (I think MW is 1,000kW?), with 2 EVs and normal working conditions I'm 24MW a year, immersion 365days, storage heater Nov-March then usual domestic appliances and thirsty home cinema. While FIT is nice I never factored it given Ireland's inept attitude and my full faith that the ESB will do everything in their power to render it financially meaningless. We should be matching our PV arrays to personal consumption and avoiding excess production IMHO, then FIT is irrelevant. If FIT, then net metering as early incentive as we need as much sustainable electricity production as possible. I've no electrical background but can see the need to move away from 60amp houses to 100amp, three phase is common enough in other countries but jazuz don't have that in Ireland, "sure what would you be doing that for" attitude. Ireland/ESB want to hold onto old ways, ESB need to move away from restrictive attitudes and move to open arms, we need large battery banks like Australia so excess becomes null and void. Blanket release of Planning Restrictions, boost the EV sector. I could go on, but what do I know
citizen6 wrote: » The figure of 6kW is coming a lot in the consultation doc. Any chance they restrict FiT to installations with less than 6kWp? I'm planning an install of approx 6kWp (with 5kW inverter). I'm wondering if it would be worth going with say 5.8kWp rather than 6.1kWp to avoid being caught out.
buzz11 wrote: » Did I read somewhere that the EU directive is implemented in June...does that mean there will be a FIT scheme of some sort by then?
unkel wrote: » Ireland is always the last in the class. Last to implement the NCT, last to implement water charges. Oh wait.
championc wrote: » you'd need to have some amount of excess to make anything any way worthwhile
holdfast wrote: » Sorry playing the devil advocate there. But the best value is consuming it all.
idc wrote: » The consultation does mention a 30 % limit on feed in to encourage self consumption. Likewise the use of BER is to ensure people spend money improving whole energy use in house ie heating/insulation and not just cover there house with as many panels as possible!!
lightson wrote: » Em I fairly sure it took mine from a c to a b think that’s big enough jump. The impact could be relative to the size of your house etc
phester28 wrote: » Solar does not have a huge impact on your BER. In fact unless you can see the DEAP values (which the assessor wont give you) you dont know what (and to what magnitude), in their opinion is causing you to loose heat per each element of the house.