nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Conor McGregor thread (MMA Talk Only - Read 1st Post Before Posting)

Axwell

With the recent addition of the Off-topic discussion thread, I am closing the current McGregor thread so that chat going forward can be located in the correct threads. This thread is for MMA related discussion only - any other gossip/showbiz type stories are to be discussed in the off topic thread.

Please make sure to review the updated charter before posting - there have been some amendments made in light of these changes and in posting here you are at all times expected to follow those rules and guidelines.

As before there is a strict rule on no chat to be had here about legal issues or court cases as per the charter - this is a strict no go regardless of where it has or hasn't been posted in the media it is not allowed on boards.ie at all. This is not up for debate and it has been said multiple times now.

Axwell

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

OneLungDavy

fitzparker wrote: »

This is a good thing, got turned off him since the Diaz 2 fight.

Why?

Alf Veedersane

fitzparker wrote: »

This is a good thing, got turned off him since the Diaz 2 fight.

who will be the team?

Anik, DC and one of Feldor/Hardy?

Anik, DC and Felder.

fitzparker

The Nal wrote: »

No, first MCGregor fight hes missed since Conor stepped into the PPV events.

This is a good thing, got turned off him since the Diaz 2 fight.

who will be the team?

Anik, DC and one of Feldor/Hardy?

Mellor

Every Conor McGregor Knockdown in the UFC

bmcc10

Cringy as it is he done it all.

https://youtu.be/5_SPV12lVyw

OneLungDavy

cloudatlas wrote: »

All the trolls in the chat section on the ufc youtube page were gutted that Conor didn't tell Dustin that his Dad smells.

Wow.

Conor displays narcissistic traits he is back because he needs the attention and that's why he's still here.

Not just that. He wants attention forever in highlight reel format.

cloudatlas

All the trolls in the chat section on the ufc youtube page were gutted that Conor didn't tell Dustin that his Dad smells.

Wow.

Conor displays narcissistic traits he is back because he needs the attention and that's why he's still here.

Whelo79

Hopefully he has a fight companion show scheduled for it. I enjoy watching those with the fights.

The Nal

robwen wrote: »

Is Joe Rogan going to be on fight island for the commentary this weekend?

No, first MCGregor fight hes missed since Conor stepped into the PPV events.

Tazzimus

No, he doesn't do travelling to other countries anymore.

robwen

Is Joe Rogan going to be on fight island for the commentary this weekend?

walshb

moneyman wrote: »

Sorry Walshy, couldn't resist! Maybe you've changed :pac:

Stop tempting me..

moneyman

walshb wrote: »

At least we know where you stand...stirring it nicely

Sorry Walshy, couldn't resist! Maybe you've changed :pac:

walshb

moneyman wrote: »

It's been a while since I ventured into the MMA forum on boards, glad to see the usual suspects are all still here winding each other up over nothing!

Just need a subtle dig at Conor from Walshb now and we're all set.

At least we know where you stand...stirring it nicely

ASOT

What times the Mcgregor fight on at lads

:pac:

The White Feather

rusty cole wrote: »

No mcgregor on embedded 2. He is giving others the light id say.

He was in 48 hour quarantine so thats why he wasn't on it

[Deleted User]

No mcgregor on embedded 2. He is giving others the light id say.

martyos121

Not enough talk about the length of his beard, how will we know what his frame of mind is like without someone to analyse the likes of that?

moneyman

MrStuffins wrote: »

I didn't think the Conor McGregor thread could be as bad aa the old days....... I was wrong :pac:

It's been a while since I ventured into the MMA forum on boards, glad to see the usual suspects are all still here winding each other up over nothing!

Just need a subtle dig at Conor from Walshb now and we're all set.

MrStuffins

I didn't think the Conor McGregor thread could be as bad aa the old days....... I was wrong :pac:

MrStuffins

Whelo79 wrote: »

Like has been said already, your original post lacked clarity, and is (and was) easily misconstrued. I don't know why you got so salty about it.

No salt here. Was just explaining myself.

moneyman

I'm not sure what MrStuffins meant, could we dedicate another couple pages to it please?

Whelo79

MrStuffins wrote: »

That's the thing.

Saying Khabib beats everyone at 155 doesn't mean he doesn't get killed by Usman or someone else not currently in the division.

Not sure how many times or ways I need to explain it.

Like has been said already, your original post lacked clarity, and is (and was) easily misconstrued. I don't know why you got so salty about it.

MrStuffins

walshb wrote: »

If Khabib grew some balls and moved up to really challenge himself then he could be very touchable..

That's the thing.

Saying Khabib beats everyone at 155 doesn't mean he doesn't get killed by Usman or someone else not currently in the division.

Not sure how many times or ways I need to explain it.

walshb

If Khabib grew some balls and moved up to really challenge himself then he could be very touchable..

At least Jon Bones Jones finally decided to take the chance...

MrStuffins

Whelo79 wrote: »

Edit: I see your explanation but you can't expect people to interpret 'what you type' to be the same as 'what you mean in your head'.

If I'd typed "Khabib is unbeatable" that would be fine.

Had I typed multiple times "Khabib is not unbeatable" multiple times, which I have, and explained myself in detail, which I have, i'm not sure why it's still being spoken about.

MrStuffins

LollipopJimmy wrote: »

I see you're taking the opportunity to apologise to absolutely nobody.

To be fair it hadn't been articulated well in the first post.

As I said, nobody at 155 right now touches Khabib. He's better than all of them.

This does not make him unbeatable.

At no point did I say he was unbeatable.

He's not unbeatable.

LollipopJimmy

MrStuffins wrote: »

I don't care to be honest.

I originally said:

to which Mellor said

Where one came from the other, only Mellor can tell you.

I've explained myself on the thread. If you can't keep up with it, that's on you.

I see you're taking the opportunity to apologise to absolutely nobody.

To be fair it hadn't been articulated well in the first post.

MrStuffins

Whelo79 wrote: »

Insert confused face here!

I can't believe a person actually typed this out and thinks it makes any sense!

I don't care to be honest.

I originally said:

MrStuffins wrote: »

Correction:

Khabib is miles ahead of the rest of that division. And nobody will trouble him.

Conor might be second, but their fight showed you that it's not close.

to which Mellor said

Mellor wrote: »

You are watching far too long to think anyone is unbeatable.
People though Ronda ws unbeatable at one point. :rolleyes:

Where one came from the other, only Mellor can tell you.

I've explained myself on the thread. If you can't keep up with it, that's on you.

US2

Mellor wrote: »

Two posts ago.

Are you really arguing that the above doesn't imply untouchable?
Or just pointing out it's not the exactly phrase you used, which seems a bit nitpicky.

So, there's nobody to touch the man, nobody will trouble him. But you are NOT implying he is unbeatable.
Honestly, I think that's a contradiction. You obviously don't somehow. Happy to leave it there, as it's going off topic.

10-8