MrStuffins wrote: » Nobody in the division can touch him, this does not mean he is untouchable. It also does not mean he is unbeatable. Give it up man! You tried to claim I said he was unbeatable when I clearly didn't.
rusty cole wrote: » I think you mean he's untouchable by those within the ranks as they are and you are correct. This is the same way Aldo went for many years, until a newbie climbed the ranks and figured him out. Yes I agree with you, that's what it will/would take because nobody in the present class have it for him, best shot though would be a rematch with mcgregor if he blitz's poirier on the assumption that is Conor mcgregor didnt give him his best in there where as Khabib did and it still went to 4 rounds...
MrStuffins wrote: » I'm not the one nitpicking. Nobody in the division can touch him, this does not mean he is untouchable. It also does not mean he is unbeatable. Give it up man! You tried to claim I said he was unbeatable when I clearly didn't. I even went through the trouble of explaining myself in detail in a subsequent post. Now you're nitpicking, but accusing me of it. If it means that much to you to be right in the internet, there's nothing I can do.
Dave0301 wrote: » Nobody in that division can touch him... Is that not the very definition of him being untouchable in the lightweight division Maybe there is a level of nuance and detail that is beyond me here :pac:
MrStuffins wrote: » I'm not the one nitpicking.Nobody in the division can touch him, this does not mean he is untouchable. It also does not mean he is unbeatable. Give it up man! You tried to claim I said he was unbeatable when I clearly didn't. I even went through the trouble of explaining myself in detail in a subsequent post. Now you're nitpicking, but accusing me of it. If it means that much to you to be right in the internet, there's nothing I can do.
Mellor wrote: » Two posts ago. Are you really arguing that the above doesn't imply untouchable?
sonofenoch wrote: » Sounds a bit nasaly in his latest interview ....cold ...covid....**** off with that
MrStuffins wrote: » I never said he was untouchable either.
MrStuffins wrote: » There's nobody in the division to touch the man.
Mellor wrote: » Where do you think I was being condescending. Wasn't my intention. I I thought I was pretty clear that I know you know what your taling about. I wasn't referring to you with the Ronda nonsense. Honestly still don't know not troubled, untouchable, etc isn't the same as unbeatable.
MrStuffins wrote: » You made an incorrect assumption and tried to be condescending with it I've clarified this already.
sonofenoch wrote: » Audacious what what, who doesn't McGregor beat from this list (aside from McGregor ) and an upcoming ? over Poirier who he's already beat Gaejthe Poirier McGregor Al laquinta Barbosa Johnson Horcher RDA Pat Healy Trujillo Tavares Tibau Shalorus I'd leave it to the experts to rate his pre-UFC opponents..................It's a very good record it's consistent but it's as padded as the accusations thrown at McGregor 145 record .........................missed out on a matchup with Ferguson 5 times, 5 fking times
yourdeadwright wrote: » What shot do you reckon McGregor throws first ? Normally he comes out the gate with something wild bar the Khabib fight,
Mellor wrote: » I've no idea what you're getting at now. If he couldn't be troubled by anyone, hoe could any one beat him.
MrStuffins wrote: » A silly assumption, made worse by an attempt to be condescending.
bur wrote: » Conor has two fights at LW in the UFC yet his fanclub have the audacity to question Khabib's record. :pac:
Esse85 wrote: » He seems pretty clear on why he wants to fight Iaquinta. Here's the short clip from his interview with Ariel.https://youtu.be/TudZRPny0pM
Mellor wrote: » I took "nobody will trouble him" to suggest he'll be unbeatable until he retires officially.
spix wrote: » He was just trying to change the subject off the donation to dustins charity and other fighters saying poirier has already lost by taking a donation.
akelly02 wrote: » visibly drunk no he wasnt .
Deleted User wrote: » Yes, he was. There. That was easy.
Deleted User wrote: » Sure he was horsing down whiskey and visibly drunk at the press conference the week before the fight.
Esse85 wrote: » Yes, Mcgregor said so in a recent interview with Ariel.